Response: “Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of the implementation of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Mozambique: a modelling study”: resource reductions are not equal to cost savings
{"title":"Response: “Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of the implementation of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Mozambique: a modelling study”: resource reductions are not equal to cost savings","authors":"Dorlim Moiana Uetela, Marita Zimmermann, Ruanne Barnabas, Kenneth Sherr","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the comments made in the letter “Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Models for HIV Treatment in Mozambique: a Modelling Study”: Resource reductions are not equal to cost savings [<span>1</span>].</p><p>First, we appreciate the authors’ recognition of the challenging work that we have done to generate evidence of the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment in Mozambique.</p><p>Second, we agree with the authors that the savings mentioned in our work are not monetary, but opportunity costs, mainly due to the reduction in the use of healthcare provider time. This reduction could theoretically allow providers to see more clients and/or provide higher-quality care. The authors state that they have never encountered a healthcare system in sub-Saharan Africa that is either able or willing to reduce its total complement of healthcare workers in response to the advent of DSD models, and no mechanism or pathway exists for DSD models to “save money.” We agree that these responses are unlikely. Rather, the reduction of provider time represents time that could be used to increase care for other clients or health areas, improving the health of the population overall without increasing costs. Our study focused on describing the opportunity costs saved through DSD model implementation. While investigating specifically how those savings could be used to advance health was beyond the scope of our work, we appreciate the discussion of implications and application of our work.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p><p>DMU drafted the response. MZ, RB and KS reviewed the draft. All authors from the original article approved the final letter.</p>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dear Editor,
We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the comments made in the letter “Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Models for HIV Treatment in Mozambique: a Modelling Study”: Resource reductions are not equal to cost savings [1].
First, we appreciate the authors’ recognition of the challenging work that we have done to generate evidence of the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment in Mozambique.
Second, we agree with the authors that the savings mentioned in our work are not monetary, but opportunity costs, mainly due to the reduction in the use of healthcare provider time. This reduction could theoretically allow providers to see more clients and/or provide higher-quality care. The authors state that they have never encountered a healthcare system in sub-Saharan Africa that is either able or willing to reduce its total complement of healthcare workers in response to the advent of DSD models, and no mechanism or pathway exists for DSD models to “save money.” We agree that these responses are unlikely. Rather, the reduction of provider time represents time that could be used to increase care for other clients or health areas, improving the health of the population overall without increasing costs. Our study focused on describing the opportunity costs saved through DSD model implementation. While investigating specifically how those savings could be used to advance health was beyond the scope of our work, we appreciate the discussion of implications and application of our work.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
DMU drafted the response. MZ, RB and KS reviewed the draft. All authors from the original article approved the final letter.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
