Advancing interactive evidence maps: Visualising service commissioning options alongside research

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1002/cesm.70003

Helen Burchett, Claire Stansfield, Wendy Macdowall, Michelle Richardson, Samantha Dick, Kelly Dickson, Preethy D'Souza, Claire Khouja, Irene Kwan, Gary Raine, Amanda Sowden, Katy Sutcliffe, James Thomas

{"title":"Advancing interactive evidence maps: Visualising service commissioning options alongside research","authors":"Helen Burchett, Claire Stansfield, Wendy Macdowall, Michelle Richardson, Samantha Dick, Kelly Dickson, Preethy D'Souza, Claire Khouja, Irene Kwan, Gary Raine, Amanda Sowden, Katy Sutcliffe, James Thomas","doi":"10.1002/cesm.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Interactive evidence maps typically visualise characteristics of research evidence, and gaps in evidence, in a particular field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims, Materials & Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here we present an example of an evidence map on digital drug and alcohol interventions in which the research evidence is supplemented with information about interventions in use (or available for use) in England. We used systematic review methods to identify systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness and an online survey to identify interventions in England.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen reviews and 40 interventions were included in the online map.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion & Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>To our knowledge, this is the first map to juxtapose research and practice in this way. By extending evidence maps to include data on service provision, it becomes easier to see whether research and practice are aligned and where gaps in either evidence or practice (or both) exist.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100286,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","volume":"2 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.70003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Interactive evidence maps typically visualise characteristics of research evidence, and gaps in evidence, in a particular field.

Aims, Materials & Methods

Here we present an example of an evidence map on digital drug and alcohol interventions in which the research evidence is supplemented with information about interventions in use (or available for use) in England. We used systematic review methods to identify systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness and an online survey to identify interventions in England.

Results

Eighteen reviews and 40 interventions were included in the online map.

Discussion & Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first map to juxtapose research and practice in this way. By extending evidence maps to include data on service provision, it becomes easier to see whether research and practice are aligned and where gaps in either evidence or practice (or both) exist.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

推进互动式证据地图：可视化服务调试选项与研究

背景交互式证据地图通常可视化特定领域的研究证据特征和证据缺口。目的、材料和方法在此，我们以数字药物和酒精干预措施为例，介绍了一个证据地图，其中的研究证据还补充了有关英格兰正在使用（或可使用）的干预措施的信息。我们采用系统性回顾方法来确定干预效果的系统性回顾，并通过在线调查来确定英格兰的干预措施。结果 18 篇综述和 40 项干预措施被纳入在线地图。讨论 & 结论据我们所知，这是第一份以这种方式将研究与实践并列的地图。通过将证据地图扩展到包括服务提供数据，可以更容易地了解研究与实践是否一致，以及证据或实践（或两者）中存在的差距。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods

自引率

0.00%

发文量