{"title":"Potential risk and efficiency analysis of decision-making dilemmas in connected dual-vehicle interactions at uncontrolled intersections","authors":"Miaomiao Yang, Qiong Bao, Yongjun Shen, Qikai Qu, Rui Zhang, Tianyuan Han, Huansong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In dual-vehicle interactive scenarios, drivers often encounter decision-making dilemmas, even with connected information, thus posing significant risk challenges to traffic operations. This study explored the impact of such dilemmas on decision-making and traffic operations for drivers involved in straight-going (SG) and left-turning (LT) vehicles at uncontrolled intersections. Employing driving simulation technology, a decision-making experiment incorporating preemptive (P) and yielding (Y) strategies was conducted with 72 S G and 72 L T drivers under connected information provision. By analyzing joint decisions (P-P, Y-P, and Y-Y) made by drivers on both sides, we investigated implications for traffic operational safety and efficiency. Furthermore, recognizing the diversity in individual characteristics and time pressure, we developed a random parameters multinomial logit model to examine the relationship between potential traffic operational performance (both safety and efficiency) and various contributing factors. Moreover, we calculated the marginal effects of these contributing factors. By assessing the probability change of Y-P joint decisions balancing safety and efficiency, we identified reference values for each contributing factor that promote effective interactive operations. The findings suggest that: (1) Regarding interactive dilemmas conditions, Conditions where the SG vehicle had higher speed and farther distance than the LT vehicle were more likely to result in heterogeneous Y-P joint decisions, in which one driver chooses to yield and the other party passes quickly, thereby improving traffic performance. (2) Time pressure increased the likelihood of heterogeneous Y-P joint decisions but also increased P-P joint decisions. (3) heterogeneous individual attributes did not always lead to higher heterogeneous decisions. Overall, this study provides insights into factors influencing joint decisions and traffic operational performance under connected information provision, considering individual heterogeneity and time pressure, aiming to the advancement of more efficient and safer vehicle-connected transportation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102734"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002823","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In dual-vehicle interactive scenarios, drivers often encounter decision-making dilemmas, even with connected information, thus posing significant risk challenges to traffic operations. This study explored the impact of such dilemmas on decision-making and traffic operations for drivers involved in straight-going (SG) and left-turning (LT) vehicles at uncontrolled intersections. Employing driving simulation technology, a decision-making experiment incorporating preemptive (P) and yielding (Y) strategies was conducted with 72 S G and 72 L T drivers under connected information provision. By analyzing joint decisions (P-P, Y-P, and Y-Y) made by drivers on both sides, we investigated implications for traffic operational safety and efficiency. Furthermore, recognizing the diversity in individual characteristics and time pressure, we developed a random parameters multinomial logit model to examine the relationship between potential traffic operational performance (both safety and efficiency) and various contributing factors. Moreover, we calculated the marginal effects of these contributing factors. By assessing the probability change of Y-P joint decisions balancing safety and efficiency, we identified reference values for each contributing factor that promote effective interactive operations. The findings suggest that: (1) Regarding interactive dilemmas conditions, Conditions where the SG vehicle had higher speed and farther distance than the LT vehicle were more likely to result in heterogeneous Y-P joint decisions, in which one driver chooses to yield and the other party passes quickly, thereby improving traffic performance. (2) Time pressure increased the likelihood of heterogeneous Y-P joint decisions but also increased P-P joint decisions. (3) heterogeneous individual attributes did not always lead to higher heterogeneous decisions. Overall, this study provides insights into factors influencing joint decisions and traffic operational performance under connected information provision, considering individual heterogeneity and time pressure, aiming to the advancement of more efficient and safer vehicle-connected transportation systems.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.