Acceptability of corporal punishment and use of different parenting practices across high-income countries

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Carolina Gonzalez, Alina Morawska, Daryl J. Higgins, Divna M. Haslam
{"title":"Acceptability of corporal punishment and use of different parenting practices across high-income countries","authors":"Carolina Gonzalez,&nbsp;Alina Morawska,&nbsp;Daryl J. Higgins,&nbsp;Divna M. Haslam","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Worldwide, many children experience corporal punishment. Most research on corporal punishment has focused on parents' attitudes and use of corporal punishment; however, other relevant parenting factors and practices have rarely been examined. This study explored differences among countries with various levels of progress toward a total legal ban of corporal punishment in parents' acceptability of corporal punishment, perception of parenting as a private concern, relationship with their child and parenting practices: consistency, coercive parenting, use of smacking and positive encouragement. Parents (<i>N</i> = 6760) of 2 to 12-year-old children from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hong Kong, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom completed the International Parenting Survey, an online cross-sectional survey. One-way ANOVAs, and MANCOVAs (after controlling for parent age, gender and educational level), indicated significant country differences. Overall, there was no clear link between corporal punishment bans and positive parenting beliefs, practices and behaviours. The two countries where corporal punishment is banned showed different patterns. Parents in Germany showed less acceptability and use of smacking; however, parents in Spain reported the highest use of coercive parenting. Country differences suggest that beyond a legal ban, attention is needed on how to support parents to raise their children in a positive, nurturing environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"59 3","pages":"648-666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.340","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, many children experience corporal punishment. Most research on corporal punishment has focused on parents' attitudes and use of corporal punishment; however, other relevant parenting factors and practices have rarely been examined. This study explored differences among countries with various levels of progress toward a total legal ban of corporal punishment in parents' acceptability of corporal punishment, perception of parenting as a private concern, relationship with their child and parenting practices: consistency, coercive parenting, use of smacking and positive encouragement. Parents (N = 6760) of 2 to 12-year-old children from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Hong Kong, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom completed the International Parenting Survey, an online cross-sectional survey. One-way ANOVAs, and MANCOVAs (after controlling for parent age, gender and educational level), indicated significant country differences. Overall, there was no clear link between corporal punishment bans and positive parenting beliefs, practices and behaviours. The two countries where corporal punishment is banned showed different patterns. Parents in Germany showed less acceptability and use of smacking; however, parents in Spain reported the highest use of coercive parenting. Country differences suggest that beyond a legal ban, attention is needed on how to support parents to raise their children in a positive, nurturing environment.

体罚的可接受性以及高收入国家采用不同育儿方法的情况
在世界范围内,许多儿童都遭受过体罚。有关体罚的研究大多集中于父母对体罚的态度和使用情况,但很少研究其他相关的养育因素和做法。本研究探讨了不同国家在法律全面禁止体罚方面取得的进展,这些国家的家长在体罚的可接受性、将养育子女视为私事的观念、与子女的关系以及养育子女的方法(一致性、强制养育、使用打耳光和积极鼓励)等方面存在的差异。来自澳大利亚、比利时、加拿大、德国、香港、西班牙、瑞士和英国的 2 至 12 岁儿童的家长(6760 人)完成了在线横断面调查 "国际养育调查"。单因素方差分析和 MANCOVA(在控制了父母的年龄、性别和教育水平后)表明,各国之间存在显著差异。总体而言,禁止体罚与积极的育儿观念、做法和行为之间没有明显的联系。禁止体罚的两个国家呈现出不同的模式。德国的家长对抽打孩子的接受度和使用率都较低;然而,西班牙的家长则报告说,他们使用强制性教养方式的比例最高。国家之间的差异表明,除了法律禁止之外,还需要关注如何支持父母在积极的养育环境中抚养子女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信