Validation of an eDNA-based workflow for monitoring inter- and intra-specific CytB haplotype diversity of alpine amphibians

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1002/edn3.573
Lucia Zanovello, Filipa M. S. Martins, Matteo Girardi, Stefano Casari, Giulio Galla, Pedro Beja, Paolo Pedrini, Giorgio Bertorelle, Heidi C. Hauffe
{"title":"Validation of an eDNA-based workflow for monitoring inter- and intra-specific CytB haplotype diversity of alpine amphibians","authors":"Lucia Zanovello,&nbsp;Filipa M. S. Martins,&nbsp;Matteo Girardi,&nbsp;Stefano Casari,&nbsp;Giulio Galla,&nbsp;Pedro Beja,&nbsp;Paolo Pedrini,&nbsp;Giorgio Bertorelle,&nbsp;Heidi C. Hauffe","doi":"10.1002/edn3.573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a promising tool for monitoring wild animal populations and, more recently, their genetic variability. In this study, we used the mitochondrial Cytochrome B gene to develop and apply new eDNA metabarcoding assays targeting amphibian families and genera in order to estimate both inter- and intraspecific genetic diversity. We designed and tested seven new primer pairs (a) in silico against an amphibian reference database based on the target genera; (b) in vitro on tissue samples of the target species; and (c) in situ on water samples from 38 wetlands in the Province of Trento (Italy). Overall, most target species were amplified successfully, although some markers also amplified non-target amphibian species. In addition, to complete the workflow, we compared the performance of three different bioinformatic pipelines (namely, MICCA with VSEARCH, and OBITools using ecotag or metabinkit), in retrieving reads and exact sequence variants from the metabarcoding datasets. Overall, the MICCA based pipeline retrieved more reads, but less putative haplotypes of amphibians. After comparing these sequences with previously known haplotypes from tissue-based studies, when the aim is to both decrease the probability of detecting false haplotypes and retrieve the highest number of reads, we suggest using MICCA+VSEARCH, unless a direct comparison with tissue-based genetic data is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.573","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a promising tool for monitoring wild animal populations and, more recently, their genetic variability. In this study, we used the mitochondrial Cytochrome B gene to develop and apply new eDNA metabarcoding assays targeting amphibian families and genera in order to estimate both inter- and intraspecific genetic diversity. We designed and tested seven new primer pairs (a) in silico against an amphibian reference database based on the target genera; (b) in vitro on tissue samples of the target species; and (c) in situ on water samples from 38 wetlands in the Province of Trento (Italy). Overall, most target species were amplified successfully, although some markers also amplified non-target amphibian species. In addition, to complete the workflow, we compared the performance of three different bioinformatic pipelines (namely, MICCA with VSEARCH, and OBITools using ecotag or metabinkit), in retrieving reads and exact sequence variants from the metabarcoding datasets. Overall, the MICCA based pipeline retrieved more reads, but less putative haplotypes of amphibians. After comparing these sequences with previously known haplotypes from tissue-based studies, when the aim is to both decrease the probability of detecting false haplotypes and retrieve the highest number of reads, we suggest using MICCA+VSEARCH, unless a direct comparison with tissue-based genetic data is possible.

Abstract Image

验证基于 eDNA 的工作流程,监测高山两栖动物特异性 CytB 单倍型之间和内部的多样性
环境 DNA(eDNA)分析是监测野生动物种群,以及最近监测其遗传变异的一种很有前途的工具。在这项研究中,我们利用线粒体细胞色素 B 基因开发并应用了针对两栖动物科和属的新型 eDNA 代谢编码检测方法,以评估种间和种内遗传多样性。我们设计并测试了七对新引物:(a) 与基于目标属的两栖动物参考数据库进行硅学分析;(b) 对目标物种的组织样本进行体外分析;(c) 对特伦托省(意大利)38 处湿地的水样进行原位分析。总体而言,大多数目标物种都能成功扩增,但有些标记也能扩增出非目标两栖动物物种。此外,为了完善工作流程,我们还比较了三种不同生物信息学管道(即使用 VSEARCH 的 MICCA 和使用 ecotag 或 metabinkit 的 OBITools)在从元条码数据集中检索读数和精确序列变异方面的性能。总体而言,基于 MICCA 的管道检索到的读数较多,但两栖动物的推定单倍型较少。在将这些序列与之前基于组织的研究中已知的单倍型进行比较后,如果既要降低检测到错误单倍型的概率,又要检索到最多的读数,我们建议使用 MICCA+VSEARCH,除非可以直接与基于组织的遗传数据进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信