Mechanical behaviors and internal pressure bearing capacity of nuclear containment using UHPC and ECC: From numerical simulation, machine learning prediction to fragility analysis

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Di Yao , Ge Gao , Qingyu Yang , Feng Fan , Jiachuan Yan
{"title":"Mechanical behaviors and internal pressure bearing capacity of nuclear containment using UHPC and ECC: From numerical simulation, machine learning prediction to fragility analysis","authors":"Di Yao ,&nbsp;Ge Gao ,&nbsp;Qingyu Yang ,&nbsp;Feng Fan ,&nbsp;Jiachuan Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) and Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) for containment structures subjected to internal pressure. It presents finite element models for these structures using UHPC, ECC, and conventional C60 concrete, validated through existing experimental data. The research compares the failure modes and mechanical behaviors of structures built from these materials. Findings show that UHPC and ECC have similar capacities for bearing internal pressure and demonstrate reduced deformation. Both materials notably diminish deformation, curtail cracking, and boost bearing capacity by approximately 30.6% compared to C60. To further analyze these properties, thirty parameter sets for C60 were created using the Latin hypercube sampling method and incorporated into the validated models to evaluate internal pressure capacity. Additionally, the study employed three machine learning algorithms (Bayesian networks, decision trees, and random forests) to predict bearing capacities effectively. With an additional thirty parameter sets, the random forest method emerged as the most precise. Parameter sets for UHPC and ECC were similarly generated and used to develop prediction models for the internal pressure capacities. In a broader scope, one hundred parameter sets across all three materials were analyzed using the random forest method. The maximum likelihood method assessed the fragility of these containment structures, providing statistical forecasts of the capacities to withstand internal pressures. This comprehensive analysis supports the application of UHPC and ECC in practical engineering contexts for containment structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"429 ","pages":"Article 113617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549324007179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) and Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) for containment structures subjected to internal pressure. It presents finite element models for these structures using UHPC, ECC, and conventional C60 concrete, validated through existing experimental data. The research compares the failure modes and mechanical behaviors of structures built from these materials. Findings show that UHPC and ECC have similar capacities for bearing internal pressure and demonstrate reduced deformation. Both materials notably diminish deformation, curtail cracking, and boost bearing capacity by approximately 30.6% compared to C60. To further analyze these properties, thirty parameter sets for C60 were created using the Latin hypercube sampling method and incorporated into the validated models to evaluate internal pressure capacity. Additionally, the study employed three machine learning algorithms (Bayesian networks, decision trees, and random forests) to predict bearing capacities effectively. With an additional thirty parameter sets, the random forest method emerged as the most precise. Parameter sets for UHPC and ECC were similarly generated and used to develop prediction models for the internal pressure capacities. In a broader scope, one hundred parameter sets across all three materials were analyzed using the random forest method. The maximum likelihood method assessed the fragility of these containment structures, providing statistical forecasts of the capacities to withstand internal pressures. This comprehensive analysis supports the application of UHPC and ECC in practical engineering contexts for containment structures.
使用 UHPC 和 ECC 的核安全壳的力学行为和内部承压能力:从数值模拟、机器学习预测到脆性分析
本文探讨了超高性能混凝土 (UHPC) 和工程水泥基复合材料 (ECC) 在承受内部压力的安全壳结构中的应用。论文介绍了使用 UHPC、ECC 和传统 C60 混凝土的这些结构的有限元模型,并通过现有实验数据进行了验证。研究比较了使用这些材料建造的结构的失效模式和机械性能。研究结果表明,UHPC 和 ECC 具有类似的承受内部压力的能力,并能减少变形。与 C60 相比,这两种材料都能显著减少变形、减少开裂,并将承载能力提高约 30.6%。为了进一步分析这些特性,研究人员使用拉丁超立方取样法为 C60 创建了 30 个参数集,并将其纳入验证模型以评估内压能力。此外,研究还采用了三种机器学习算法(贝叶斯网络、决策树和随机森林)来有效预测承载能力。在增加了 30 个参数集后,随机森林方法成为最精确的方法。同样,UHPC 和 ECC 的参数集也被生成并用于开发内部承压能力预测模型。在更大范围内,使用随机森林法分析了所有三种材料的 100 个参数集。最大似然法评估了这些安全壳结构的脆弱性,提供了承受内部压力能力的统计预测。这项综合分析支持了超高性能混凝土和 ECC 在安全壳结构实际工程中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信