Modeling and benchmarking XRF analysis using MCNP for applications in accident tolerant fuel and cladding

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
James Cahill, Victoria Davis, Caleb King, Lilith Miller, Tristan Norrgard, Carlos E. Castano, Reza Mohammadi, Jessika Rojas, Braden Goddard
{"title":"Modeling and benchmarking XRF analysis using MCNP for applications in accident tolerant fuel and cladding","authors":"James Cahill,&nbsp;Victoria Davis,&nbsp;Caleb King,&nbsp;Lilith Miller,&nbsp;Tristan Norrgard,&nbsp;Carlos E. Castano,&nbsp;Reza Mohammadi,&nbsp;Jessika Rojas,&nbsp;Braden Goddard","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is an interest in using nondestructive testing (NDT) methods for the preliminary investigation of accident-tolerant fuel cladding materials, such as chromium (Cr) coated Zircaloy-4 (Zr4). One promising application is X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. Computational methods, such as Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport (MCNP) 6.2, can be used to expand algorithms based on XRF measurements, however, it has been demonstrated that MCNP is more sensitive to modeling imperfections at lower energies (<span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow></math></span> 80 keV). In this work, several MCNP models were developed to evaluate the XRF measurements given by a Niton XL-5 device to minimize deviations at low energies. The final model was benchmarked to an experimental XRF measurement of Cr-coated Zr4 taken by the XL-5. The percent error in the resulting XRF peak intensities was within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 4.92% for the K<sub>α1</sub> peaks and within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 16.0% for the K<sub>β1</sub>. The discrepancies in the magnitude of these errors are largely due to the K<sub>β1</sub> peaks having far fewer counts in the spectra that were compared. Nonetheless, these results demonstrate the potential for MCNP 6.2 to accurately predict low-energy X-ray interactions such as XRF. The deviations observed were similar to those seen in the 0.1–1 MeV range in prior works, despite only being in the <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo></mrow></math></span> 5–30 keV range themselves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105487"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an interest in using nondestructive testing (NDT) methods for the preliminary investigation of accident-tolerant fuel cladding materials, such as chromium (Cr) coated Zircaloy-4 (Zr4). One promising application is X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. Computational methods, such as Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport (MCNP) 6.2, can be used to expand algorithms based on XRF measurements, however, it has been demonstrated that MCNP is more sensitive to modeling imperfections at lower energies ( 80 keV). In this work, several MCNP models were developed to evaluate the XRF measurements given by a Niton XL-5 device to minimize deviations at low energies. The final model was benchmarked to an experimental XRF measurement of Cr-coated Zr4 taken by the XL-5. The percent error in the resulting XRF peak intensities was within ± 4.92% for the Kα1 peaks and within ± 16.0% for the Kβ1. The discrepancies in the magnitude of these errors are largely due to the Kβ1 peaks having far fewer counts in the spectra that were compared. Nonetheless, these results demonstrate the potential for MCNP 6.2 to accurately predict low-energy X-ray interactions such as XRF. The deviations observed were similar to those seen in the 0.1–1 MeV range in prior works, despite only being in the 5–30 keV range themselves.
利用 MCNP 对 XRF 分析进行建模和基准测试,以应用于耐事故燃料和包壳
人们对使用无损检测(NDT)方法来初步调查耐事故燃料包壳材料(如铬(Cr)涂层锆合金-4(Zr4))很感兴趣。X 射线荧光 (XRF) 分析是一项很有前景的应用。Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport (MCNP) 6.2 等计算方法可用于扩展基于 XRF 测量的算法,然而,事实证明 MCNP 在较低能量(≤ 80 keV)时对建模缺陷更为敏感。在这项工作中,开发了多个 MCNP 模型来评估由 Niton XL-5 设备提供的 XRF 测量结果,以尽量减少低能量时的偏差。最终模型以 XL-5 对镀有铬的 Zr4 进行的 XRF 实验测量为基准。得出的 XRF 峰强度百分比误差,Kα1 峰在± 4.92% 以内,Kβ1 峰在± 16.0% 以内。这些误差幅度上的差异主要是由于在比较的光谱中,Kβ1 峰的计数要少得多。尽管如此,这些结果还是证明了 MCNP 6.2 在准确预测低能 X 射线相互作用(如 XRF)方面的潜力。所观察到的偏差与之前研究中 0.1-1 MeV 范围内的偏差相似,尽管其本身仅在∼ 5-30 keV 范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信