Alison C. Coogan , Paige A. Blinn , Ethan M. Ritz , Alan Tan , Lilia Lunt , Rachel Akers , Cristina O'Donoghue
{"title":"The impact of demographics and socioeconomic status on the receipt of immunotherapy for stage III melanoma","authors":"Alison C. Coogan , Paige A. Blinn , Ethan M. Ritz , Alan Tan , Lilia Lunt , Rachel Akers , Cristina O'Donoghue","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is limited data examining potential disparities in the receipt of immunotherapy among patients with stage III melanoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort review using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) including adult patients with stage III melanoma between 2004 and 2017. We compared receipt of immunotherapy based on demographic and socioeconomic factors for patients diagnosed 2004–2014 and 2016–2017, before and after FDA approval of immune checkpoint blockade.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>12,099 patients were included. The proportion of stage III patients who received immunotherapy significantly increased over time, from 24.0 % in 2004–2014 to 43.7 % in 2016–2017 (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in patients who receive immunotherapy based on age (p < 0.001), insurance (p < 0.001), facility location (p < 0.001).On multivariable analysis, increased odds of immunotherapy receipt were found in patients with diagnosis in 2016–2017 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.3, 95 % CI 2.9–3.7), younger age (65–80 years aOR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.35–0.52), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 1.5, 95 % CI 1.1–2.1), and private insurance (not insured aOR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.52–0.85).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although narrowing, gaps persist in the receipt of immunotherapy after FDA approval. Understanding disparities in the receipt of immunotherapy will aid in understanding barriers to treatment and ensuring patients have equitable access to advanced care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424001245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is limited data examining potential disparities in the receipt of immunotherapy among patients with stage III melanoma.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort review using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) including adult patients with stage III melanoma between 2004 and 2017. We compared receipt of immunotherapy based on demographic and socioeconomic factors for patients diagnosed 2004–2014 and 2016–2017, before and after FDA approval of immune checkpoint blockade.
Results
12,099 patients were included. The proportion of stage III patients who received immunotherapy significantly increased over time, from 24.0 % in 2004–2014 to 43.7 % in 2016–2017 (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in patients who receive immunotherapy based on age (p < 0.001), insurance (p < 0.001), facility location (p < 0.001).On multivariable analysis, increased odds of immunotherapy receipt were found in patients with diagnosis in 2016–2017 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.3, 95 % CI 2.9–3.7), younger age (65–80 years aOR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.35–0.52), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 1.5, 95 % CI 1.1–2.1), and private insurance (not insured aOR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.52–0.85).
Conclusions
Although narrowing, gaps persist in the receipt of immunotherapy after FDA approval. Understanding disparities in the receipt of immunotherapy will aid in understanding barriers to treatment and ensuring patients have equitable access to advanced care.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.