Translation and psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP)

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q1 REHABILITATION

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103202

Aviya Levin , Ruth Goldstein , Jan Hartvigsen , Henrik Hein Lauridsen , Tamar Pincus , Noa Ben Ami

{"title":"Translation and psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP)","authors":"Aviya Levin , Ruth Goldstein , Jan Hartvigsen , Henrik Hein Lauridsen , Tamar Pincus , Noa Ben Ami","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Low back pain (LBP) is a widespread cause of disability worldwide. Self-management is a significant factor impacting an individual's ability to cope with LBP. The Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) assesses the ability of people with LBP to self-manage their illness.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the PEI-BP into Hebrew and evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study with a nested prospective sub‐sample.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The PEI-BP was translated and culturally adapted into Hebrew using recommended guidelines. We included 188 LBP patients. The psychometric properties of the PEI-BP were evaluated according to the COSMIN methodology. For construct validity, the Ronald Morris disability questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-physical activity, the 12-item Short‐Form Health Survey mental health, and the Numerical pain rating scale were included. To assess reliability, a sub-sample of participants (n = 50) completed the PEI-BP again after one week and after six weeks (n = 50) to evaluate responsiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PEI-BP demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.821) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.77). For construct validity, four out of the five hypothesized correlations were confirmed. Responsiveness showed a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve area of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67–0.93); the minimal detectable change was 14.5. A potential significant ceiling but no floor effects were observed (17.5% and 6.4%, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The translation and validation of the PEI-BP suggest that it is a feasible, reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for evaluating 'patient enablement' with LBP in the Hebrew-speaking population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 103202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is a widespread cause of disability worldwide. Self-management is a significant factor impacting an individual's ability to cope with LBP. The Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) assesses the ability of people with LBP to self-manage their illness.

Objective

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the PEI-BP into Hebrew and evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Design

Cross-sectional study with a nested prospective sub‐sample.

Methods

The PEI-BP was translated and culturally adapted into Hebrew using recommended guidelines. We included 188 LBP patients. The psychometric properties of the PEI-BP were evaluated according to the COSMIN methodology. For construct validity, the Ronald Morris disability questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-physical activity, the 12-item Short‐Form Health Survey mental health, and the Numerical pain rating scale were included. To assess reliability, a sub-sample of participants (n = 50) completed the PEI-BP again after one week and after six weeks (n = 50) to evaluate responsiveness.

Results

The PEI-BP demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.821) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.77). For construct validity, four out of the five hypothesized correlations were confirmed. Responsiveness showed a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve area of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67–0.93); the minimal detectable change was 14.5. A potential significant ceiling but no floor effects were observed (17.5% and 6.4%, respectively).

Conclusions

The translation and validation of the PEI-BP suggest that it is a feasible, reliable, valid, and responsive instrument for evaluating 'patient enablement' with LBP in the Hebrew-speaking population.

查看原文本刊更多论文

希伯来语版背痛患者赋能工具（PEI-BP）的翻译和心理测量特性

背景腰背痛（LBP）是导致全球残疾的一个普遍原因。自我管理是影响个人应对腰背痛能力的一个重要因素。背痛患者能力评估工具（PEI-BP）可评估腰背痛患者自我管理疾病的能力。本研究旨在将 PEI-BP 翻译成希伯来语并进行文化调整，同时评估其可靠性、有效性和响应性。我们纳入了 188 名枸杞多糖症患者。根据 COSMIN 方法评估了 PEI-BP 的心理测量特性。为了评估结构效度，我们纳入了罗纳德-莫里斯残疾问卷、简明疾病感知问卷、恐惧-逃避信念问卷-体力活动、12 项短式健康调查心理健康和数字疼痛评分量表。结果 PEI-BP 显示出良好的内部一致性（Cronbach's α = 0.821）和测试-再测可靠性（ICC = 0.77）。在建构效度方面，五项假设相关性中有四项得到了证实。反应性的接收者操作特征曲线面积为 0.81（95% CI 0.67-0.93）；可检测到的最小变化为 14.5。结论 PEI-BP 的翻译和验证表明，它是一种可行、可靠、有效且反应灵敏的工具，可用于评估希伯来语人群中 "患者对腰椎间盘突出症的适应能力"。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

8.70%

发文量

152

审稿时长

48 days

期刊介绍： Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.