Machine learning prediction of unexpected readmission or death after discharge from intensive care: A retrospective cohort study

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Thomas Tschoellitsch MD , Alexander Maletzky PhD , Philipp Moser PhD , Philipp Seidl MSc , Carl Böck PhD , Tina Tomic Mahečić MD , Stefan Thumfart PhD , Michael Giretzlehner PhD , Sepp Hochreiter PhD , Jens Meier MD
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of unexpected readmission or death after discharge from intensive care: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Thomas Tschoellitsch MD ,&nbsp;Alexander Maletzky PhD ,&nbsp;Philipp Moser PhD ,&nbsp;Philipp Seidl MSc ,&nbsp;Carl Böck PhD ,&nbsp;Tina Tomic Mahečić MD ,&nbsp;Stefan Thumfart PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Giretzlehner PhD ,&nbsp;Sepp Hochreiter PhD ,&nbsp;Jens Meier MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intensive care units (ICUs) harbor the sickest patients with the utmost needs of medical care. Discharge from ICU needs to consider the reason for admission and stability after ICU care. Organ dysfunction or instability after ICU discharge constitute potentially life-threatening situations for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single center, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted at ICUs at the Kepler University Hospital in Linz, Austria. Patients aged 18 years and above admitted to the study center's ICUs between 2010 and 01-01 and 2019-10-31 were included in the study. Patients transferred to another ICU, discharged to a different hospital or home, or that died during their ICU stay were excluded. We used machine learning (ML) models to predict unplanned ICU readmission or death using an internal dataset or MIMIC-IV as training data and compared the models with the Stability and Workload Index for Transfer (SWIFT) score. Further, we evaluated the influence of features on the models using Shapley Additive Explanations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best ML models achieved an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.721 ± 0.029 and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.990 ± 0.002. The most important features were heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and arterial blood pressure. Performance of the SWIFT score was worse than the ML models (best AUC-ROC 0.618 ± 0.011).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ML models were able to identify patients that will not need unplanned ICU readmission and will not die within 48 h after discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111654"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intensive care units (ICUs) harbor the sickest patients with the utmost needs of medical care. Discharge from ICU needs to consider the reason for admission and stability after ICU care. Organ dysfunction or instability after ICU discharge constitute potentially life-threatening situations for patients.

Methods

This is a single center, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted at ICUs at the Kepler University Hospital in Linz, Austria. Patients aged 18 years and above admitted to the study center's ICUs between 2010 and 01-01 and 2019-10-31 were included in the study. Patients transferred to another ICU, discharged to a different hospital or home, or that died during their ICU stay were excluded. We used machine learning (ML) models to predict unplanned ICU readmission or death using an internal dataset or MIMIC-IV as training data and compared the models with the Stability and Workload Index for Transfer (SWIFT) score. Further, we evaluated the influence of features on the models using Shapley Additive Explanations.

Results

The best ML models achieved an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.721 ± 0.029 and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.990 ± 0.002. The most important features were heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and arterial blood pressure. Performance of the SWIFT score was worse than the ML models (best AUC-ROC 0.618 ± 0.011).

Conclusions

ML models were able to identify patients that will not need unplanned ICU readmission and will not die within 48 h after discharge.
重症监护出院后意外再入院或死亡的机器学习预测:回顾性队列研究
背景重症监护病房(ICU)收治的都是最需要医疗护理的病人。从重症监护室出院需要考虑入院原因和重症监护室护理后的稳定性。ICU出院后器官功能障碍或不稳定可能会危及患者的生命。方法这是一项在奥地利林茨开普勒大学医院 ICU 进行的单中心、观察性、回顾性队列研究。研究对象包括2010年1月1日至2019年10月31日期间入住研究中心重症监护室的18岁及以上患者。不包括转入其他重症监护室、出院到其他医院或家中的患者,也不包括在重症监护室住院期间死亡的患者。我们使用内部数据集或 MIMIC-IV 作为训练数据,使用机器学习(ML)模型预测非计划 ICU 再入院或死亡,并将模型与转院稳定性和工作量指数(SWIFT)评分进行比较。结果最佳 ML 模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积 (AUC-ROC) 为 0.721 ± 0.029,负预测值 (NPV) 为 0.990 ± 0.002。最重要的特征是心率、外周血氧饱和度和动脉血压。SWIFT评分的性能比ML模型差(最佳AUC-ROC为0.618 ± 0.011)。结论ML模型能够识别不需要非计划ICU再入院且不会在出院后48小时内死亡的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信