Stronger association of intact angiotensinogen with mortality than lactate or renin in critical illness: post-hoc analysis from the VICTAS trial

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mark C. Chappell, Christopher L. Schaich, Laurence W. Busse, Greg S. Martin, Jonathan E. Sevransky, Jeremiah K. Hinson, Ashish K. Khanna
{"title":"Stronger association of intact angiotensinogen with mortality than lactate or renin in critical illness: post-hoc analysis from the VICTAS trial","authors":"Mark C. Chappell, Christopher L. Schaich, Laurence W. Busse, Greg S. Martin, Jonathan E. Sevransky, Jeremiah K. Hinson, Ashish K. Khanna","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05120-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis and septic shock remain global healthcare problems associated with high mortality rates despite best therapy efforts. Circulating biomarkers may identify those patients at risk for poor outcomes, however, current biomarkers, most prominently lactate, are non-specific and have an inconsistent impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin- system (RAS) is an early event in sepsis patients and elevated levels of circulating renin are more predictive of worse outcomes than lactate. The precursor protein Angiotensinogen is another key component of the circulating RAS; it is the only known substrate for renin and the ultimate source of the vasopressor Angiotensin II (Ang II). We postulate that lower Angiotensinogen concentrations may reflect a dysfunctional RAS characterized by high renin concentrations but attenuated Ang II generation, which is disproportionate to the high renin response and may compromise adequate support of blood pressure and tissue perfusion in septic patients. The current study compared the association between serum Angiotensinogen with mortality to that of lactate and renin in the VICTAS cohort of sepsis patients at baseline (day 0) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan–Meier curve analyses. Serum concentration of Angiotensinogen was more strongly associated with 30-day mortality than either the serum concentrations of renin or lactate in sepsis patients. Moreover, the clinical assessment of Angiotensinogen may have distinct advantages over the typical measures of renin. The assessment of intact Angiotensinogen may potentially facilitate more precise therapeutic approaches (including exogenous angiotensin II) to restore a dysfunctional RAS and improve patient outcomes. Additional prospective validation studies are clearly required for this biomarker in the future.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05120-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock remain global healthcare problems associated with high mortality rates despite best therapy efforts. Circulating biomarkers may identify those patients at risk for poor outcomes, however, current biomarkers, most prominently lactate, are non-specific and have an inconsistent impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin- system (RAS) is an early event in sepsis patients and elevated levels of circulating renin are more predictive of worse outcomes than lactate. The precursor protein Angiotensinogen is another key component of the circulating RAS; it is the only known substrate for renin and the ultimate source of the vasopressor Angiotensin II (Ang II). We postulate that lower Angiotensinogen concentrations may reflect a dysfunctional RAS characterized by high renin concentrations but attenuated Ang II generation, which is disproportionate to the high renin response and may compromise adequate support of blood pressure and tissue perfusion in septic patients. The current study compared the association between serum Angiotensinogen with mortality to that of lactate and renin in the VICTAS cohort of sepsis patients at baseline (day 0) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan–Meier curve analyses. Serum concentration of Angiotensinogen was more strongly associated with 30-day mortality than either the serum concentrations of renin or lactate in sepsis patients. Moreover, the clinical assessment of Angiotensinogen may have distinct advantages over the typical measures of renin. The assessment of intact Angiotensinogen may potentially facilitate more precise therapeutic approaches (including exogenous angiotensin II) to restore a dysfunctional RAS and improve patient outcomes. Additional prospective validation studies are clearly required for this biomarker in the future.
在危重病人中,完整血管紧张素原与死亡率的关系比乳酸或肾素更密切:VICTAS 试验的事后分析
脓毒症和脓毒性休克仍然是全球性的医疗保健问题,尽管已采取了最佳治疗措施,但死亡率仍然很高。然而,目前的生物标志物(最主要的是乳酸)并不具有特异性,对预后和/或疾病管理的影响也不一致。肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)的激活是败血症患者的早期症状,循环中肾素水平的升高比乳酸盐更能预测不良预后。前体蛋白血管紧张素原是循环 RAS 的另一个关键组成部分;它是肾素的唯一已知底物,也是血管紧张素 II(Ang II)的最终来源。我们推测,血管紧张素原浓度较低可能反映了肾素浓度较高但血管紧张素 II 生成减弱的 RAS 功能失调,这与高肾素反应不成比例,可能会影响脓毒症患者血压和组织灌注的充分支持。本研究通过接收器操作特征(ROC)和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析,比较了 VICTAS 组群脓毒症患者在基线(第 0 天)时血清血管紧张素原与死亡率之间的关系,以及乳酸盐和肾素与死亡率之间的关系。在脓毒症患者中,血清血管紧张素原浓度与 30 天死亡率的关系比肾素或乳酸盐浓度的关系更密切。此外,与肾素的典型测量方法相比,血管紧张素原的临床评估可能具有独特的优势。评估完整的血管紧张素原可能有助于采用更精确的治疗方法(包括外源性血管紧张素 II)来恢复功能失调的 RAS 并改善患者的预后。未来显然还需要对这一生物标志物进行更多的前瞻性验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信