Mapping the cell therapy landscape: insights into clinical trials and regulatory advances in China

IF 29.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Xin Du, Xingxian Luo, Lanqiu Liu, Yanlin Cao, Yajuan Zhang, Yi Zhang
{"title":"Mapping the cell therapy landscape: insights into clinical trials and regulatory advances in China","authors":"Xin Du, Xingxian Luo, Lanqiu Liu, Yanlin Cao, Yajuan Zhang, Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13045-024-01616-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, cell therapy research and commercialization have significantly accelerated, especially after the US FDA approved CAR-T therapy. While cell therapy now leads immuno-oncology in clinical trials, challenges such as redundant R&D, target clustering, and unmet clinical need remain. Since 2017, China has established a dual-track regulatory framework, facilitating rapid growth in its cell therapy pipeline, making it the second largest in the world. Despite this progress, China faces similar global challenges. Our study covers 2,794 registered cell therapy clinical trials in China, including 2,045 for immune cell, 683 for stem cell, and 66 for other somatic cell. It compares cell therapy products approved in China, the US, EU, and Japan, analyzes the evolving clinical trials landscape, and highlights the characteristics of investigator-initiated trials (IITs) and industry-sponsored trials (ISTs) in China. Our findings indicate that despite the high disease burden and unmet clinical needs for solid tumors in China, over 38% of trials between 2021 and 2023 focused on hematologic malignancies with established targets like CD19 and BCMA. Over 90% of trials are IITs, which show notable clinical differences from ISTs. We recommend that Chinese regulators establish specific guidelines to promote clinical-value-driven research. Stricter regulatory standards should also be implemented to minimize redundant R&D. Additionally, a value-based reimbursement system for within-class targeted cell therapy products may further reduce duplicated R&D efforts. Given the prevalence of IITs, specifying requirements for IITs could create a new pathway to accelerate product development and better address unmet clinical needs in China.","PeriodicalId":16023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hematology & Oncology","volume":"229 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":29.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01616-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, cell therapy research and commercialization have significantly accelerated, especially after the US FDA approved CAR-T therapy. While cell therapy now leads immuno-oncology in clinical trials, challenges such as redundant R&D, target clustering, and unmet clinical need remain. Since 2017, China has established a dual-track regulatory framework, facilitating rapid growth in its cell therapy pipeline, making it the second largest in the world. Despite this progress, China faces similar global challenges. Our study covers 2,794 registered cell therapy clinical trials in China, including 2,045 for immune cell, 683 for stem cell, and 66 for other somatic cell. It compares cell therapy products approved in China, the US, EU, and Japan, analyzes the evolving clinical trials landscape, and highlights the characteristics of investigator-initiated trials (IITs) and industry-sponsored trials (ISTs) in China. Our findings indicate that despite the high disease burden and unmet clinical needs for solid tumors in China, over 38% of trials between 2021 and 2023 focused on hematologic malignancies with established targets like CD19 and BCMA. Over 90% of trials are IITs, which show notable clinical differences from ISTs. We recommend that Chinese regulators establish specific guidelines to promote clinical-value-driven research. Stricter regulatory standards should also be implemented to minimize redundant R&D. Additionally, a value-based reimbursement system for within-class targeted cell therapy products may further reduce duplicated R&D efforts. Given the prevalence of IITs, specifying requirements for IITs could create a new pathway to accelerate product development and better address unmet clinical needs in China.
绘制细胞疗法图景:洞察中国的临床试验和监管进展
近年来,细胞疗法的研究和商业化进程明显加快,尤其是在美国 FDA 批准 CAR-T 疗法之后。虽然细胞疗法目前在临床试验中领先于免疫肿瘤学,但冗余研发、靶点集群和未满足临床需求等挑战依然存在。自 2017 年以来,中国建立了双轨监管框架,促进了细胞疗法管线的快速增长,使其成为全球第二大细胞疗法管线。尽管取得了这一进展,但中国也面临着类似的全球性挑战。我们的研究涵盖了 2794 项在中国注册的细胞疗法临床试验,其中包括 2045 项免疫细胞临床试验、683 项干细胞临床试验和 66 项其他体细胞临床试验。它比较了中国、美国、欧盟和日本批准的细胞治疗产品,分析了不断变化的临床试验格局,并突出了中国研究者发起的试验(IIT)和行业赞助的试验(IST)的特点。我们的研究结果表明,尽管中国实体瘤的疾病负担较重,临床需求尚未得到满足,但在2021年至2023年期间,超过38%的试验集中于血液系统恶性肿瘤,其靶点已确立,如CD19和BCMA。90%以上的试验是IITs,与ISTs有明显的临床差异。我们建议中国监管机构制定具体指南,促进临床价值驱动型研究。还应实施更严格的监管标准,尽量减少重复研发。此外,对同类靶向细胞治疗产品实行基于价值的报销制度,可进一步减少重复研发工作。考虑到 IIT 的普遍性,明确规定 IIT 的要求可为加快产品开发和更好地满足中国尚未满足的临床需求开辟一条新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hematology & Oncology, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research covering all aspects of hematology and oncology, including reviews and research highlights on "hot topics" by leading experts. Given the close relationship and rapid evolution of hematology and oncology, the journal aims to meet the demand for a dedicated platform for publishing discoveries from both fields. It serves as an international platform for sharing laboratory and clinical findings among laboratory scientists, physician scientists, hematologists, and oncologists in an open-access format. With a rapid turnaround time from submission to publication, the journal facilitates real-time sharing of knowledge and new successes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信