Resisting Post-Political Adaptation to Climate Change: How a Small Community Stood Up to Big Development

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/anti.13091
Michael Mikulewicz
{"title":"Resisting Post-Political Adaptation to Climate Change: How a Small Community Stood Up to Big Development","authors":"Michael Mikulewicz","doi":"10.1111/anti.13091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent critical scholarship has brought attention to local resistance in the spaces of adaptation, with reported instances of local communities rejecting planned adaptation interventions around the world. As adaptation funding is only expected to grow, so should our understanding of this resistance. In this article, I investigate one such dispute where residents of a small village in São Tomé and Príncipe refused to participate in an adaptation project implemented by the national government and the United Nations Development Programme. I ground my analysis in the literature on post-politics and discuss the community's resistance as a Rancièrian “political interruption” of the post-political adaptation configuration in the country. I also investigate the factors that arguably led to local resistance, including the residents’ disillusion with what I term Big Development, and their political subjectivation through a local grassroots initiative. The paper concludes with reflections on countering the post-politics of adaptation as a prerequisite for more democratic and equitable local climate governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.13091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent critical scholarship has brought attention to local resistance in the spaces of adaptation, with reported instances of local communities rejecting planned adaptation interventions around the world. As adaptation funding is only expected to grow, so should our understanding of this resistance. In this article, I investigate one such dispute where residents of a small village in São Tomé and Príncipe refused to participate in an adaptation project implemented by the national government and the United Nations Development Programme. I ground my analysis in the literature on post-politics and discuss the community's resistance as a Rancièrian “political interruption” of the post-political adaptation configuration in the country. I also investigate the factors that arguably led to local resistance, including the residents’ disillusion with what I term Big Development, and their political subjectivation through a local grassroots initiative. The paper concludes with reflections on countering the post-politics of adaptation as a prerequisite for more democratic and equitable local climate governance.

抵制后政治适应气候变化:小社区如何抵御大发展
近期的批判性学术研究使人们开始关注适应空间中的地方阻力,据报道,世界各地都有地方社区拒绝接受计划中的适应干预措施的事例。随着适应资金的增长,我们对这种抵制的理解也应随之增长。在本文中,我调查了圣多美和普林西比一个小村庄的居民拒绝参与由国家政府和联合国开发计划署实施的适应项目的争议。我将我的分析建立在后政治学文献的基础上,并将该社区的抵制行为视为对该国后政治适应配置的一种兰西埃式的 "政治中断"。我还研究了可能导致当地反抗的因素,包括居民对我所说的大发展的失望,以及他们通过当地基层倡议实现的政治主体化。最后,本文对反击适应的后政治学进行了反思,认为这是更民主、更公平的地方气候治理的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信