Pharmacist review of discharge antibiotics for urinary tract infections in the emergency department

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sarah Temi Sofeso Pharm.D., Emily Plasencia Pharm.D., Ana A. Safri Pharm.D., MBA, Cedric S. White Pharm.D., Natalija Mead Farrell Pharm.D., Jessica L. Corio Pharm.D., Danielle Kebadjian Lindale Pharm.D., Madeline Palmer M.D., Bryan J. Gendron Pharm.D.
{"title":"Pharmacist review of discharge antibiotics for urinary tract infections in the emergency department","authors":"Sarah Temi Sofeso Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Emily Plasencia Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ana A. Safri Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Cedric S. White Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Natalija Mead Farrell Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Jessica L. Corio Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Danielle Kebadjian Lindale Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Madeline Palmer M.D.,&nbsp;Bryan J. Gendron Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.2009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists provide high-quality patient care in a fast-paced environment by optimizing pharmacotherapy regimens and reducing medication errors. Current literature demonstrates higher rates of medication errors with antibiotics compared with other medication classes. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to reduce medication errors by 25% from baseline for antibiotic discharge prescriptions for urinary tract infections (UTIs). This QI initiative utilized the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement to implement a UTI stewardship intervention and prospective pharmacist review of discharge prescriptions. Patients discharged from the adult ED with an electronic prescription for UTI treatment with select antibiotics were included. The primary outcome metric was the percent of medication errors, defined as a composite of appropriate antibiotic agent, dose, frequency, and treatment duration based on our local treatment algorithm. The balancing metric was time spent per order reviewed. Data over time were assessed using statistical process control charts. A total of 534 antibiotic prescriptions were reviewed from January 9, 2022 to May 31, 2023. The most common indication was cystitis (70%), followed by pyelonephritis (17.4%) and asymptomatic bacteriuria (12.5%). Composite error rate decreased from 64.2% to 5%. Duration of therapy was the most common baseline error and was reduced from 45.3% to 11.6%. Errors in agent, dose and frequency decreased from 19.7% to 3.5%, 10.3% to 0.8% and from 5.7% to 0%, respectively. The aim of this QI initiative was achieved through a series of interventions, including prospective review of discharge antibiotics for UTIs by EM pharmacists, which reduced medication errors. This project demonstrates EM pharmacists have a positive impact in optimization of antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of UTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists provide high-quality patient care in a fast-paced environment by optimizing pharmacotherapy regimens and reducing medication errors. Current literature demonstrates higher rates of medication errors with antibiotics compared with other medication classes. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to reduce medication errors by 25% from baseline for antibiotic discharge prescriptions for urinary tract infections (UTIs). This QI initiative utilized the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement to implement a UTI stewardship intervention and prospective pharmacist review of discharge prescriptions. Patients discharged from the adult ED with an electronic prescription for UTI treatment with select antibiotics were included. The primary outcome metric was the percent of medication errors, defined as a composite of appropriate antibiotic agent, dose, frequency, and treatment duration based on our local treatment algorithm. The balancing metric was time spent per order reviewed. Data over time were assessed using statistical process control charts. A total of 534 antibiotic prescriptions were reviewed from January 9, 2022 to May 31, 2023. The most common indication was cystitis (70%), followed by pyelonephritis (17.4%) and asymptomatic bacteriuria (12.5%). Composite error rate decreased from 64.2% to 5%. Duration of therapy was the most common baseline error and was reduced from 45.3% to 11.6%. Errors in agent, dose and frequency decreased from 19.7% to 3.5%, 10.3% to 0.8% and from 5.7% to 0%, respectively. The aim of this QI initiative was achieved through a series of interventions, including prospective review of discharge antibiotics for UTIs by EM pharmacists, which reduced medication errors. This project demonstrates EM pharmacists have a positive impact in optimization of antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of UTIs.

药剂师对急诊科尿路感染出院抗生素的审查
急诊医学(EM)药剂师通过优化药物治疗方案和减少用药错误,在快节奏的环境中为患者提供高质量的护理。现有文献表明,与其他药物类别相比,抗生素的用药错误率较高。本质量改进(QI)项目旨在将尿路感染(UTI)抗生素出院处方的用药错误率从基线降低 25%。该 QI 项目采用了美国医疗保健改进研究所的改进模式,实施了尿路感染管理干预措施,并由药剂师对出院处方进行前瞻性审核。从成人急诊室出院并持有使用特定抗生素治疗UTI的电子处方的患者被纳入其中。主要结果指标是用药错误的百分比,根据我们当地的治疗算法,定义为适当抗生素药剂、剂量、频率和治疗时间的综合。平衡指标是审查每张订单所花费的时间。使用统计过程控制图对一段时间内的数据进行评估。从 2022 年 1 月 9 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日,共审核了 534 份抗生素处方。最常见的适应症是膀胱炎(70%),其次是肾盂肾炎(17.4%)和无症状菌尿(12.5%)。综合错误率从 64.2% 降至 5%。治疗时间是最常见的基线错误,从 45.3% 降至 11.6%。药剂、剂量和频率错误分别从 19.7% 降至 3.5%、10.3% 降至 0.8%、5.7% 降至 0%。通过一系列干预措施,包括由急诊科药剂师对尿毒症出院抗生素进行前瞻性审查,减少了用药错误,从而实现了这一 QI 计划的目标。该项目证明了急诊科药剂师在优化治疗尿毒症的抗菌药物疗法方面的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信