ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT FOR PLACENTA ACCRETA SPECTRUM PRIOR TO SECOND TRIMESTER DILATION AND EVACUATION

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
M Coley, K Meadows, M Hou, M Chen
{"title":"ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT FOR PLACENTA ACCRETA SPECTRUM PRIOR TO SECOND TRIMESTER DILATION AND EVACUATION","authors":"M Coley,&nbsp;K Meadows,&nbsp;M Hou,&nbsp;M Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Ultrasound (US) markers for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) are often undetectable until late second trimester, increasing the risk of complications during dilation and evacuation. We assessed the prevalence of these markers and their predictive value for complications in patients with prior cesarean delivery (CD) undergoing dilation and evacuation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included patients with prior CD who underwent dilation and evacuation between 14 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks’ gestation from 05/2020-12/2021. We abstracted obstetric history, placental US findings, and perioperative data from electronic records. We compared complications between those with and without PAS-associated US markers defined by the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Bleeding complications were defined as ≥2 uterotonics use, blood transfusion, intrauterine balloon placement, uterine artery embolization, and hysterectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 770 patients undergoing dilation and evacuation, 209(27%) had one or more prior CDs. On US, 24(11%) patients had lacunae, 20(10%) had placenta previa, 12(6%) had abnormal flow, 7(3%) had bridging vessels, and 6(3%) had an abnormal uteroplacental interface. Based on these markers, 16(8%) were considered moderate risk for PAS. Complications occurred in 25(12%) patients, most commonly use of ≥2 uterotonics (10, 40%), blood transfusion (6, 24%), and intrauterine balloon placement (5, 20%). Patients with pre-procedure US indicating moderate risk for PAS were not more likely to have complications compared to those considered low risk [4(25%) vs 18 (9%); p=0.07].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>US assessment for PAS did not predict higher bleeding complications during dilation and evacuation. Enhanced early second-trimester PAS risk characterization is necessary for improved perioperative readiness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Ultrasound (US) markers for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) are often undetectable until late second trimester, increasing the risk of complications during dilation and evacuation. We assessed the prevalence of these markers and their predictive value for complications in patients with prior cesarean delivery (CD) undergoing dilation and evacuation.

Methods

We included patients with prior CD who underwent dilation and evacuation between 14 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks’ gestation from 05/2020-12/2021. We abstracted obstetric history, placental US findings, and perioperative data from electronic records. We compared complications between those with and without PAS-associated US markers defined by the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Bleeding complications were defined as ≥2 uterotonics use, blood transfusion, intrauterine balloon placement, uterine artery embolization, and hysterectomy.

Results

Of 770 patients undergoing dilation and evacuation, 209(27%) had one or more prior CDs. On US, 24(11%) patients had lacunae, 20(10%) had placenta previa, 12(6%) had abnormal flow, 7(3%) had bridging vessels, and 6(3%) had an abnormal uteroplacental interface. Based on these markers, 16(8%) were considered moderate risk for PAS. Complications occurred in 25(12%) patients, most commonly use of ≥2 uterotonics (10, 40%), blood transfusion (6, 24%), and intrauterine balloon placement (5, 20%). Patients with pre-procedure US indicating moderate risk for PAS were not more likely to have complications compared to those considered low risk [4(25%) vs 18 (9%); p=0.07].

Conclusions

US assessment for PAS did not predict higher bleeding complications during dilation and evacuation. Enhanced early second-trimester PAS risk characterization is necessary for improved perioperative readiness.
在第二产程扩张和排空前对胎盘重置频谱进行超声波评估
目的胎盘早剥谱(PAS)的超声(US)标记物通常在妊娠后期才能检测到,这增加了扩张和排空过程中出现并发症的风险。我们评估了这些标记物的流行率及其对接受扩张和排空术的既往剖宫产(CD)患者并发症的预测价值。方法我们纳入了 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在孕 14 0/7 周至 23 6/7 周之间接受扩张和排空术的既往 CD 患者。我们从电子记录中摘录了产科病史、胎盘 US 检查结果和围手术期数据。我们比较了有和没有母胎医学会定义的 PAS 相关 US 标记的并发症。出血并发症的定义是使用子宫收缩剂≥2次、输血、宫内球囊置入、子宫动脉栓塞和子宫切除术。在超声检查中,24(11%)名患者出现裂孔,20(10%)名患者出现前置胎盘,12(6%)名患者血流异常,7(3%)名患者出现桥接血管,6(3%)名患者出现异常子宫胎盘界面。根据这些指标,16 例(8%)被认为是 PAS 的中度风险患者。25(12%)名患者发生了并发症,最常见的并发症是使用≥2次子宫收缩剂(10,40%)、输血(6,24%)和宫腔内球囊置入(5,20%)。与低风险患者相比,术前 US 显示有中度 PAS 风险的患者出现并发症的几率并不高 [4(25%) vs 18(9%); p=0.07]。为了改善围手术期的准备情况,有必要加强第二胎早期PAS风险鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信