OUTCOMES OF UNDESIRED RAPE-RELATED PREGNANCIES WITH HYDE-ONLY COMPARED TO FULL MEDICAID COVERAGE OF ABORTIONS: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
KM Schaefer, MI Rodriguez
{"title":"OUTCOMES OF UNDESIRED RAPE-RELATED PREGNANCIES WITH HYDE-ONLY COMPARED TO FULL MEDICAID COVERAGE OF ABORTIONS: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS","authors":"KM Schaefer,&nbsp;MI Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of undesired rape-related pregnancies (RRP) when Medicaid abortion coverage is limited to Hyde restrictions compared to full Medicaid coverage of abortions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a theoretical cohort of 80,000 individuals on Medicaid who have an undesired RRP, with cohort size determined by CDC data. We used TreeAge to model RRP outcomes when abortions are covered only by Medicaid as permitted under the Hyde amendment and compare this to outcomes when abortions are covered by Medicaid under any circumstances over a ten year span. Outcomes include cost to Medicaid, quality-adjusted life-years, Medicaid-covered abortions, out-of-pocket abortions, first trimester abortions, second trimester abortions, and uncomplicated and complicated pregnancies resulting in births. Probabilities, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature. A Medicaid perspective was assumed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our model demonstrated that among RRPs, limiting abortion coverage to Hyde restrictions results in fewer Medicaid-paid abortions, more out-of-pocket abortions, and more pregnancies resulting in births compared to the counterfactual of full Medicaid abortion coverage. In a Hyde-only coverage scenario, there would be 44,228 fewer Medicaid-paid abortions – a 96% decrease relative to Medicaid-paid abortions with full coverage – and 21,577 more out-of-pocket abortions. Full Medicaid coverage of abortion in this population would avert 22,988 pregnancies with cost-savings of $313.6 million.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study suggests that limiting Medicaid coverage of abortions to strictly Hyde Amendment exceptions decreases payment for and access to abortions for rape-related pregnancies, despite these abortions meeting Hyde criteria for federal funding. This demonstrates a failure of Medicaid to pay for 96% of abortions for undesired RRP and comes at a significantly increased cost to Medicaid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of undesired rape-related pregnancies (RRP) when Medicaid abortion coverage is limited to Hyde restrictions compared to full Medicaid coverage of abortions.

Methods

We used a theoretical cohort of 80,000 individuals on Medicaid who have an undesired RRP, with cohort size determined by CDC data. We used TreeAge to model RRP outcomes when abortions are covered only by Medicaid as permitted under the Hyde amendment and compare this to outcomes when abortions are covered by Medicaid under any circumstances over a ten year span. Outcomes include cost to Medicaid, quality-adjusted life-years, Medicaid-covered abortions, out-of-pocket abortions, first trimester abortions, second trimester abortions, and uncomplicated and complicated pregnancies resulting in births. Probabilities, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature. A Medicaid perspective was assumed.

Results

Our model demonstrated that among RRPs, limiting abortion coverage to Hyde restrictions results in fewer Medicaid-paid abortions, more out-of-pocket abortions, and more pregnancies resulting in births compared to the counterfactual of full Medicaid abortion coverage. In a Hyde-only coverage scenario, there would be 44,228 fewer Medicaid-paid abortions – a 96% decrease relative to Medicaid-paid abortions with full coverage – and 21,577 more out-of-pocket abortions. Full Medicaid coverage of abortion in this population would avert 22,988 pregnancies with cost-savings of $313.6 million.

Conclusions

This study suggests that limiting Medicaid coverage of abortions to strictly Hyde Amendment exceptions decreases payment for and access to abortions for rape-related pregnancies, despite these abortions meeting Hyde criteria for federal funding. This demonstrates a failure of Medicaid to pay for 96% of abortions for undesired RRP and comes at a significantly increased cost to Medicaid.
与医疗补助对人工流产的全面覆盖相比,仅使用海德人工流产对与强奸有关的意外怀孕的结果:成本效益分析
目标我们旨在估算当医疗补助计划的人工流产覆盖范围仅限于海德限制时,与医疗补助计划完全覆盖人工流产时,与强奸相关的意外怀孕(RRP)的成本效益和妊娠结果。方法我们使用了一个理论队列,该队列包含 8 万名医疗补助计划中的意外 RRP 患者,队列规模由疾病预防控制中心的数据确定。我们使用 TreeAge 对海德修正案允许的仅由医疗补助计划承保堕胎的 RRP 结果进行建模,并将其与医疗补助计划在任何情况下承保堕胎的十年结果进行比较。结果包括医疗补助计划的成本、质量调整生命年、医疗补助计划承保的人工流产、自费人工流产、前三个月人工流产、后三个月人工流产以及导致分娩的无并发症和并发症妊娠。概率、成本和效用均来自文献。结果我们的模型表明,在 RRPs 中,与完全覆盖 Medicaid 堕胎的反事实相比,将堕胎覆盖范围限制在海德限制范围内会导致更少的 Medicaid 付费堕胎、更多的自费堕胎以及更多的妊娠导致分娩。在仅适用海德方案的情况下,医疗补助计划支付的堕胎费用将减少 44 228 例(与医疗补助计划全面覆盖的堕胎费用相比减少了 96%),自费堕胎费用将增加 21 577 例。这项研究表明,将医疗补助计划的堕胎覆盖范围严格限制在海德修正案的例外情况下,会减少对强奸相关妊娠堕胎的支付和获取,尽管这些堕胎符合联邦资助的海德标准。这表明,医疗补助计划未能支付 96% 的非意愿 RRP 流产,而且医疗补助计划的成本大幅增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信