Unraveling stochastic fundamental diagrams with empirical knowledge: Modeling, limitations, and future directions

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yuan-Zheng Lei, Yaobang Gong, Xianfeng Terry Yang
{"title":"Unraveling stochastic fundamental diagrams with empirical knowledge: Modeling, limitations, and future directions","authors":"Yuan-Zheng Lei,&nbsp;Yaobang Gong,&nbsp;Xianfeng Terry Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traffic flow modeling relies heavily on fundamental diagrams. However, deterministic fundamental diagrams, such as single or multi-regime models, cannot capture the underlying uncertainty in traffic flow. To address this limitation, this study proposes a non-parametric Gaussian process model to formulate the stochastic fundamental diagram. Unlike parametric models, the non-parametric approach is insensitive to parameters, flexible, and widely applicable. The computational complexity and high memory requirements of Gaussian process regression are also mitigated by introducing sparse Gaussian process regression. This study also examines the impact of incorporating empirical knowledge into the prior of the stochastic fundamental diagram model and assesses whether such knowledge can enhance the model’s robustness and accuracy. By using several well-known single-regime fundamental diagram models as priors and testing the model’s performance with different sampling methods on real-world data, this study finds that empirical knowledge benefits the model only when small inducing samples are used with a relatively clean and large dataset. In other cases, a purely data-driven approach is sufficient to estimate and describe the density–speed relationship pattern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traffic flow modeling relies heavily on fundamental diagrams. However, deterministic fundamental diagrams, such as single or multi-regime models, cannot capture the underlying uncertainty in traffic flow. To address this limitation, this study proposes a non-parametric Gaussian process model to formulate the stochastic fundamental diagram. Unlike parametric models, the non-parametric approach is insensitive to parameters, flexible, and widely applicable. The computational complexity and high memory requirements of Gaussian process regression are also mitigated by introducing sparse Gaussian process regression. This study also examines the impact of incorporating empirical knowledge into the prior of the stochastic fundamental diagram model and assesses whether such knowledge can enhance the model’s robustness and accuracy. By using several well-known single-regime fundamental diagram models as priors and testing the model’s performance with different sampling methods on real-world data, this study finds that empirical knowledge benefits the model only when small inducing samples are used with a relatively clean and large dataset. In other cases, a purely data-driven approach is sufficient to estimate and describe the density–speed relationship pattern.
用经验知识揭示随机基本图:建模、局限性和未来方向
交通流建模在很大程度上依赖于基本图。然而,确定性基本图(如单一或多制度模型)无法捕捉交通流中潜在的不确定性。针对这一局限性,本研究提出了一种非参数高斯过程模型来制定随机基本图。与参数模型不同,非参数方法对参数不敏感,具有灵活性和广泛适用性。通过引入稀疏高斯过程回归,高斯过程回归的计算复杂性和高内存要求也得到了缓解。本研究还探讨了将经验知识纳入随机基本图模型先验的影响,并评估了这些知识是否能增强模型的稳健性和准确性。通过使用几个著名的单周期基本图模型作为先验,并在真实世界的数据上使用不同的抽样方法测试模型的性能,本研究发现,只有在使用相对干净和大型数据集的小诱导样本时,经验知识才会对模型有利。在其他情况下,纯粹的数据驱动方法足以估计和描述密度-速度关系模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信