Main lessons learnt from 40 years of R&D on iodine source term prediction: Identification of the main parameters governing iodine volatility in PHEBUS FP tests

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Loïc Bosland, Karine Chevalier-Jabet
{"title":"Main lessons learnt from 40 years of R&D on iodine source term prediction: Identification of the main parameters governing iodine volatility in PHEBUS FP tests","authors":"Loïc Bosland,&nbsp;Karine Chevalier-Jabet","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Iodine chemistry and phenomenology in the containment has been studied for several decades. The main phenomena leading to the formation of volatile iodine have been identified step by step and their kinetics has been modeled and capitalized over the years in ASTEC-SOPHAEROS IRSN Severe Accident (S.A) code. Recently, the uncertainties for each phenomenon have been quantified and uncertainty propagation calculations have been performed on PHEBUS FPT-0/1/2/3 tests within the objective to identify which phenomena govern iodine volatility. The main highlights from PHEBUS studies are that (1) the sump reactions do not contribute to iodine volatility and (2) the gaseous phase chemical reactions are the main contributor to iodine volatility and (3) only a few gaseous reactions govern iodine volatility in PHEBUS containment. Another objective was to narrow the estimated range of %I<sub>2_RCS</sub> (gaseous iodine fraction coming from the RCS). The results show that, considering 43 uncertain parameters, the iodine volatility plume is compatible with the experimental data whatever 2% &lt; %I<sub>2_RCS</sub> &lt; 50% that mostly govern iodine volatility in the first days. It also indicates that, as soon as the FP release from the core is stopped and whatever 2% &lt; %I<sub>2_RCS</sub> &lt; 50%, the influence of %I<sub>2_RCS</sub> decreases over time so that the main processes leading to iodine volatility are slowly switched from %I<sub>2_RCS</sub> (short term) to other gaseous phenomena (long term). The influence of %I<sub>2_RCS</sub> on iodine volatility is thus important in the short term but becomes less and less significant in the long term (after several days). A more complete analysis is necessary for reactor applications to identify if the same conclusions can be drawn.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 105473"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Iodine chemistry and phenomenology in the containment has been studied for several decades. The main phenomena leading to the formation of volatile iodine have been identified step by step and their kinetics has been modeled and capitalized over the years in ASTEC-SOPHAEROS IRSN Severe Accident (S.A) code. Recently, the uncertainties for each phenomenon have been quantified and uncertainty propagation calculations have been performed on PHEBUS FPT-0/1/2/3 tests within the objective to identify which phenomena govern iodine volatility. The main highlights from PHEBUS studies are that (1) the sump reactions do not contribute to iodine volatility and (2) the gaseous phase chemical reactions are the main contributor to iodine volatility and (3) only a few gaseous reactions govern iodine volatility in PHEBUS containment. Another objective was to narrow the estimated range of %I2_RCS (gaseous iodine fraction coming from the RCS). The results show that, considering 43 uncertain parameters, the iodine volatility plume is compatible with the experimental data whatever 2% < %I2_RCS < 50% that mostly govern iodine volatility in the first days. It also indicates that, as soon as the FP release from the core is stopped and whatever 2% < %I2_RCS < 50%, the influence of %I2_RCS decreases over time so that the main processes leading to iodine volatility are slowly switched from %I2_RCS (short term) to other gaseous phenomena (long term). The influence of %I2_RCS on iodine volatility is thus important in the short term but becomes less and less significant in the long term (after several days). A more complete analysis is necessary for reactor applications to identify if the same conclusions can be drawn.
从 40 年的碘源期预测研发中汲取的主要经验教训:确定 PHEBUS FP 试验中影响碘挥发的主要参数
对安全壳中碘的化学性质和现象的研究已有几十年的历史。多年来,ASTEC-SOPHAEROS IRSN 严重事故(S.A)代码逐步确定了导致形成挥发性碘的主要现象,并对其动力学进行了建模和资本化。最近,对每种现象的不确定性进行了量化,并对 PHEBUS FPT-0/1/2/3 试验进行了不确定性传播计算,目的是确定哪些现象会影响碘的挥发性。PHEBUS 研究的主要亮点是:(1) 底盘反应不会导致碘挥发;(2) 气相化学反应是导致碘挥发的主要因素;(3) PHEBUS 容器中只有少数气相反应会导致碘挥发。另一个目标是缩小 %I2_RCS(来自 RCS 的气态碘部分)的估计范围。结果表明,考虑到 43 个不确定参数,碘挥发羽流与实验数据相符,无论 2%<%I2_RCS<50%,这些参数在最初几天主要控制碘挥发。这也表明,一旦堆芯中的FP释放停止,无论2%< %I2_RCS<50%是多少,%I2_RCS的影响都会随着时间的推移而减小,这样导致碘挥发的主要过程就会慢慢地从%I2_RCS(短期)转向其他气体现象(长期)。因此,%I2_RCS 对碘挥发的影响在短期内很重要,但在长期内(几天后)则越来越小。有必要对反应器应用进行更全面的分析,以确定是否可以得出相同的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信