Enhancing group decision-making: Maximum consensus aggregation for fuzzy cross-efficiency under hesitant fuzzy linguistic information

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Hui-Hui Song , Ying-Ming Wang , Luis Martínez
{"title":"Enhancing group decision-making: Maximum consensus aggregation for fuzzy cross-efficiency under hesitant fuzzy linguistic information","authors":"Hui-Hui Song ,&nbsp;Ying-Ming Wang ,&nbsp;Luis Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Group decision-making (GDM) is essential as it recognizes the inherent complexity of many decision scenarios, which frequently require the collective wisdom and knowledge of multiple decision-makers (DMs) to be effectively resolved. The proposed method aims to develop fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency models tailored to address GDM challenges, wherein attribute values are provided by DMs using hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs). For this purpose, we initially transform HFLTSs into their corresponding fuzzy envelopes, defined as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs). This conversion strategy effectively minimizes the loss in assessments based on HFLTSs while retaining the inherent ambiguity of the original information. Building upon this foundation, we develop fuzzy cross-efficiency models by leveraging the <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>-level sets of fuzzy envelopes. These models are designed to handle fuzzy input and output variables under various <span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>-level sets, which are capable of considering all possible attribute values for each alternative. Following this, we implement a maximum consensus model using fuzzy cross-efficiency to assign weights to DMs. These weights facilitate the aggregation of individual fuzzy cross-efficiency intervals obtained from DMs’ assessments into collective ones, which serve to rank alternatives. Finally, we showcase the effectiveness and superiority of our proposal through numerical validation and comparative analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 110622"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007447","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Group decision-making (GDM) is essential as it recognizes the inherent complexity of many decision scenarios, which frequently require the collective wisdom and knowledge of multiple decision-makers (DMs) to be effectively resolved. The proposed method aims to develop fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency models tailored to address GDM challenges, wherein attribute values are provided by DMs using hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs). For this purpose, we initially transform HFLTSs into their corresponding fuzzy envelopes, defined as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs). This conversion strategy effectively minimizes the loss in assessments based on HFLTSs while retaining the inherent ambiguity of the original information. Building upon this foundation, we develop fuzzy cross-efficiency models by leveraging the α-level sets of fuzzy envelopes. These models are designed to handle fuzzy input and output variables under various α-level sets, which are capable of considering all possible attribute values for each alternative. Following this, we implement a maximum consensus model using fuzzy cross-efficiency to assign weights to DMs. These weights facilitate the aggregation of individual fuzzy cross-efficiency intervals obtained from DMs’ assessments into collective ones, which serve to rank alternatives. Finally, we showcase the effectiveness and superiority of our proposal through numerical validation and comparative analysis.
加强群体决策:犹豫模糊语言信息下模糊交叉效率的最大共识聚合
群体决策(GDM)是非常重要的,因为它认识到了许多决策情景的内在复杂性,这些情景往往需要多个决策者(DMs)的集体智慧和知识才能有效解决。所提出的方法旨在开发模糊数据包络分析(DEA)交叉效率模型,以解决 GDM 面临的挑战,其中的属性值由 DM 使用犹豫模糊语言术语集(HFLTS)提供。为此,我们首先将 HFLTS 转换为相应的模糊包络,定义为梯形模糊数 (TrFN)。这种转换策略有效地减少了基于 HFLTS 的评估损失,同时保留了原始信息固有的模糊性。在此基础上,我们利用模糊包络的 α 级集开发了模糊交叉效率模型。这些模型旨在处理各种 α 级集合下的模糊输入和输出变量,能够考虑每个备选方案的所有可能属性值。随后,我们利用模糊交叉效率实施最大共识模型,为 DM 分配权重。这些权重有助于将从 DM 评估中获得的单个模糊交叉效率区间汇总为集体区间,从而对备选方案进行排序。最后,我们通过数值验证和比较分析,展示了我们建议的有效性和优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信