Mechanism of online public opinion formation in major risk events in China: A qualitative comparative analysis

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Bingqin Han , Shuang Song , Diyi Liu , Jiapei Mo
{"title":"Mechanism of online public opinion formation in major risk events in China: A qualitative comparative analysis","authors":"Bingqin Han ,&nbsp;Shuang Song ,&nbsp;Diyi Liu ,&nbsp;Jiapei Mo","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding societal attitudes toward major risk events after they occur poses a significant challenge for governments. This study employs fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine 88 cases of major risk events in China from 2019 to 2023, categorized into natural disasters, accidents, social security threats, and public health crises. We propose an integrated theoretical framework combining information ecology theory and social mentality theory, aiming to uncover the driving pathways that shape positive and negative online social mentalities during these events. The findings reveal the following insights: (1) Media and government significantly influence online community attitudes during major natural disasters. (2) In major accidents, the social environment predominantly shapes stable aspects of societal mentality, yet media and government also adapt dynamically, influencing online societal attitudes accordingly. (3) Major social security events exhibit a diverse trajectory in online social mentality, underscoring the intricate factors affecting public sentiment. The study emphasizes the role of free agents in generating negative online attitudes. (4) During major public health crises, the scale of the event and media coverage exert considerable influence, with media responsiveness varying with shifts in event magnitude. Furthermore, coordinated ecological factors influence the trajectory of online societal attitude changes. These findings offer valuable insights and strategies for managing public opinion during significant risk events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 1","pages":"Article 103924"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324002838","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding societal attitudes toward major risk events after they occur poses a significant challenge for governments. This study employs fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine 88 cases of major risk events in China from 2019 to 2023, categorized into natural disasters, accidents, social security threats, and public health crises. We propose an integrated theoretical framework combining information ecology theory and social mentality theory, aiming to uncover the driving pathways that shape positive and negative online social mentalities during these events. The findings reveal the following insights: (1) Media and government significantly influence online community attitudes during major natural disasters. (2) In major accidents, the social environment predominantly shapes stable aspects of societal mentality, yet media and government also adapt dynamically, influencing online societal attitudes accordingly. (3) Major social security events exhibit a diverse trajectory in online social mentality, underscoring the intricate factors affecting public sentiment. The study emphasizes the role of free agents in generating negative online attitudes. (4) During major public health crises, the scale of the event and media coverage exert considerable influence, with media responsiveness varying with shifts in event magnitude. Furthermore, coordinated ecological factors influence the trajectory of online societal attitude changes. These findings offer valuable insights and strategies for managing public opinion during significant risk events.
中国重大风险事件中的网络舆情形成机制:定性比较分析
在重大风险事件发生后,了解社会对重大风险事件的态度是政府面临的一项重大挑战。本研究采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,对 2019 年至 2023 年中国重大风险事件的 88 个案例进行研究,分为自然灾害、意外事故、社会安全威胁和公共卫生危机。我们提出了一个结合信息生态理论和社会心态理论的综合理论框架,旨在揭示在这些事件中形成积极和消极网络社会心态的驱动路径。研究结果揭示了以下观点:(1) 在重大自然灾害期间,媒体和政府对网络社区态度有显著影响。(2)在重大事故中,社会环境主要影响社会心态的稳定方面,但媒体和政府也会动态调整,相应地影响网络社会态度。(3) 重大社会安全事件的网络社会心态呈现出多样化的轨迹,凸显了影响公众情绪的错综复杂的因素。研究强调了自由媒介在引发负面网络态度中的作用。(4) 在重大公共卫生危机期间,事件的规模和媒体报道产生了相当大的影响,媒体的反应能力随着事件规模的变化而变化。此外,协调的生态因素也会影响网络社会态度的变化轨迹。这些发现为重大风险事件期间的舆论管理提供了宝贵的见解和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信