Response to induction chemotherapy modifies the effect of conventional prognostic factors in high-risk neuroblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group

Elizabeth Sokol , Brian LaBarre , Navin Pinto , Susan Kreissman , M. Meaghan Granger , Julie R. Park , Rochelle Bagatell , Arlene Naranjo , Steven G. DuBois
{"title":"Response to induction chemotherapy modifies the effect of conventional prognostic factors in high-risk neuroblastoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group","authors":"Elizabeth Sokol ,&nbsp;Brian LaBarre ,&nbsp;Navin Pinto ,&nbsp;Susan Kreissman ,&nbsp;M. Meaghan Granger ,&nbsp;Julie R. Park ,&nbsp;Rochelle Bagatell ,&nbsp;Arlene Naranjo ,&nbsp;Steven G. DuBois","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Response to induction chemotherapy has been shown to predict outcome in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB), with those achieving a complete response (CR) having superior outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated whether conventional prognostic factors remain prognostic in subsets of patients defined by response to induction. 1244 Patients from four COG high-risk trials were included. End-induction response was coded as CR, partial response (PR) or better, less than PR without progressive disease (PD), and PD. Cox regression models were performed to calculate event-free and overall survival (EFS, OS) hazard ratios, including interaction terms between induction response and prognostic factors including sex, age, stage, primary tumor location, LDH, ferritin, ploidy, <em>MYCN</em> status, <em>ALK</em> status, histology, MKI, grade, and study era.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among patients who achieved a CR after induction, INSS stage 4 disease and trial era were the only factors that remained significantly associated with inferior OS. For those who achieved less than a PR, adrenal primary site, <em>MYCN</em> amplification, and 1p LOH were associated with inferior outcomes. Multivariable models showed that end-induction response remained prognostic of EFS and OS even after controlling for other factors. Multiple significant statistical interactions were observed between end-induction response and other prognostic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The impact of conventional prognostic factors is not static in patients with HR-NB. Instead, response to induction chemotherapy modifies the effect of conventional prognostic factors. These data can help to further refine prognosis for patients with variable responses to induction and help to identify candidates who might benefit from treatment other than standard post-induction therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Response to induction chemotherapy has been shown to predict outcome in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB), with those achieving a complete response (CR) having superior outcomes.

Methods

We evaluated whether conventional prognostic factors remain prognostic in subsets of patients defined by response to induction. 1244 Patients from four COG high-risk trials were included. End-induction response was coded as CR, partial response (PR) or better, less than PR without progressive disease (PD), and PD. Cox regression models were performed to calculate event-free and overall survival (EFS, OS) hazard ratios, including interaction terms between induction response and prognostic factors including sex, age, stage, primary tumor location, LDH, ferritin, ploidy, MYCN status, ALK status, histology, MKI, grade, and study era.

Results

Among patients who achieved a CR after induction, INSS stage 4 disease and trial era were the only factors that remained significantly associated with inferior OS. For those who achieved less than a PR, adrenal primary site, MYCN amplification, and 1p LOH were associated with inferior outcomes. Multivariable models showed that end-induction response remained prognostic of EFS and OS even after controlling for other factors. Multiple significant statistical interactions were observed between end-induction response and other prognostic factors.

Conclusion

The impact of conventional prognostic factors is not static in patients with HR-NB. Instead, response to induction chemotherapy modifies the effect of conventional prognostic factors. These data can help to further refine prognosis for patients with variable responses to induction and help to identify candidates who might benefit from treatment other than standard post-induction therapy.
对诱导化疗的反应可改变传统预后因素对高危神经母细胞瘤的影响:儿童肿瘤学小组的报告
背景诱导化疗反应已被证明可预测高危神经母细胞瘤(HR-NB)患者的预后,其中获得完全反应(CR)的患者预后更佳。我们纳入了来自四项COG高风险试验的1244名患者。诱导末期反应分为CR、部分反应(PR)或更好、小于PR但无进展性疾病(PD)和PD。采用Cox回归模型计算无事件生存率和总生存率(EFS、OS)危险比,包括诱导反应与性别、年龄、分期、原发肿瘤位置、LDH、铁蛋白、倍体、MYCN状态、ALK状态、组织学、MKI、分级和研究年代等预后因素之间的交互项。在获得PR以下的患者中,肾上腺原发部位、MYCN扩增和1p LOH与不良预后相关。多变量模型显示,即使在控制了其他因素后,诱导末期反应仍是EFS和OS的预后因素。结论 常规预后因素对HR-NB患者的影响并非一成不变。相反,诱导化疗反应会改变传统预后因素的影响。这些数据有助于进一步完善对诱导化疗反应不一的患者的预后,并帮助确定可能从诱导化疗后标准治疗以外的治疗中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信