Comparison of the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™ laryngeal mask in children undergoing surgery in the supine and prone position – A prospective, non-inferiority clinical trial
Darhae Eum , Ha Yan Kim , Yangjin Kim , Seokyung Shin
{"title":"Comparison of the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™ laryngeal mask in children undergoing surgery in the supine and prone position – A prospective, non-inferiority clinical trial","authors":"Darhae Eum , Ha Yan Kim , Yangjin Kim , Seokyung Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Reports are limited regarding supraglottic airway (SGA) usage in children in the prone position. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™, a 2nd generation SGA, in children undergoing surgery in the prone and supine positions. We hypothesized that oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) in the prone position would not be inferior to that in the supine position.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Single-center, prospective, non-randomized controlled study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Operating room.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>One hundred and twenty-six children, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, aged 2–12 years, undergoing elective surgery for 2 h or less in the supine or prone position.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>After induction of general anesthesia and insertion of the AuraGain, patients were positioned either supine or prone, according to type of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>OLP immediately after surgical positioning was measured as the primary outcome. The anatomical position of the AuraGain was evaluated using a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus LF-DP Tracheal Intubation Fiberscope, Melville, New York, USA). Airway maneuvers performed during placement and maintenance of the AuraGain and airway-related adverse events were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The mean difference in OLP immediately after positioning was 0.048 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95 % confidence interval: −1.521 to 1.616), and the non-inferiority hypothesis was accepted (<em>P</em> < 0.001 for non-inferiority). There was no significant difference in the anatomical position of the SGA and adverse events. Airway maneuvers were significantly more commonly performed during placement in the Prone group compared to the Supine group (51 (81.0 %) vs. 3 (4.8 %), respectively; <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>OLP when using AuraGain in the prone position in children was not inferior to that in the supine position. This suggests that the AuraGain may be an effective option for children undergoing short surgical procedures in the prone position.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111652"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective
Reports are limited regarding supraglottic airway (SGA) usage in children in the prone position. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of the Ambu®AuraGain™, a 2nd generation SGA, in children undergoing surgery in the prone and supine positions. We hypothesized that oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) in the prone position would not be inferior to that in the supine position.
One hundred and twenty-six children, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, aged 2–12 years, undergoing elective surgery for 2 h or less in the supine or prone position.
Interventions
After induction of general anesthesia and insertion of the AuraGain, patients were positioned either supine or prone, according to type of surgery.
Measurements
OLP immediately after surgical positioning was measured as the primary outcome. The anatomical position of the AuraGain was evaluated using a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus LF-DP Tracheal Intubation Fiberscope, Melville, New York, USA). Airway maneuvers performed during placement and maintenance of the AuraGain and airway-related adverse events were recorded.
Main findings
The mean difference in OLP immediately after positioning was 0.048 cmH2O (95 % confidence interval: −1.521 to 1.616), and the non-inferiority hypothesis was accepted (P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). There was no significant difference in the anatomical position of the SGA and adverse events. Airway maneuvers were significantly more commonly performed during placement in the Prone group compared to the Supine group (51 (81.0 %) vs. 3 (4.8 %), respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusion
OLP when using AuraGain in the prone position in children was not inferior to that in the supine position. This suggests that the AuraGain may be an effective option for children undergoing short surgical procedures in the prone position.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.