Hao Liu , Xiang-Chong Liu , De-Hui Zhang , Zhen-Ju Zhou , Feng-Bin Han
{"title":"The precipitation mechanisms of scheelite from CO2-rich hydrothermal fluids: Insight from thermodynamic modeling","authors":"Hao Liu , Xiang-Chong Liu , De-Hui Zhang , Zhen-Ju Zhou , Feng-Bin Han","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scheelite and wolframite are two main tungsten-bearing ore minerals in tungsten deposits. Compared to wolframite formed mostly by NaCl–H<sub>2</sub>O fluids, scheelite in many but not all tungsten deposits is associated with CO<sub>2</sub>–bearing hydrothermal fluids, but its precipitation mechanisms from these fluids are poorly understood. The replacement of wolframite by scheelite is common among tungsten deposits where these two tungstates coexist, but how CO<sub>2</sub>, as the pH-buffering agent, affects their replacement remains unclear. To answer these questions, we first tested the pH-buffering effect of CO<sub>2</sub> by comparing available experimental pH values of H<sub>2</sub>O–CO<sub>2</sub>±NaCl solutions at 200–280 °C and the corresponding thermodynamic modeling results. The mean absolute errors between the calculated and experimental pH values are 0.14 log units in H<sub>2</sub>O–CO<sub>2</sub> solutions and 0.13 log units in H<sub>2</sub>O–CO<sub>2</sub>–NaCl solutions, indicating that the calculated acitivities of H<sup>+</sup> in CO<sub>2</sub>-bearing solutions are reliable. Then, the solubilities of scheelite, scheelite-ferberite, and scheelite-hübnerite in NaCl–H<sub>2</sub>O–CO<sub>2</sub> systems were modeled in this study. Our modeling results suggest that scheelite solubility in CO<sub>2</sub>-rich fluids is highly dependent on fluid pressure but is insensitive to fluid temperature. A decrease in fluid pressure from lithostatic to hydrostatic levels at a depth of 3–8 km causes CO<sub>2</sub> escape and pH rise and precipitates over 70 % of tungsten contents in fluids on average. Therefore, CO<sub>2</sub> escape is an efficient mechanism for precipitating scheelite from CO<sub>2</sub>–rich hydrothermal fluids. The independence of scheelite solubility on temperature at high pressures and the slightly retrograde solubility at low pressures allows CO<sub>2</sub>–rich hydrothermal fluids to carry a great amount of tungsten far away from its sources. This may be one of reasons why some scheelite deposits occur at greater distances (>500 m) from the granite or extend along its strike for several kilometers. Similar to the cases in NaCl–H<sub>2</sub>O systems, two mechanisms for scheelite replacing wolframite in CO<sub>2</sub>–rich fluids are identified, a single decrease in fluid pressure or simple cooling plus an increase in the ratios of total Ca contents to total Fe (or Mn) contents in fluids.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292724002920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scheelite and wolframite are two main tungsten-bearing ore minerals in tungsten deposits. Compared to wolframite formed mostly by NaCl–H2O fluids, scheelite in many but not all tungsten deposits is associated with CO2–bearing hydrothermal fluids, but its precipitation mechanisms from these fluids are poorly understood. The replacement of wolframite by scheelite is common among tungsten deposits where these two tungstates coexist, but how CO2, as the pH-buffering agent, affects their replacement remains unclear. To answer these questions, we first tested the pH-buffering effect of CO2 by comparing available experimental pH values of H2O–CO2±NaCl solutions at 200–280 °C and the corresponding thermodynamic modeling results. The mean absolute errors between the calculated and experimental pH values are 0.14 log units in H2O–CO2 solutions and 0.13 log units in H2O–CO2–NaCl solutions, indicating that the calculated acitivities of H+ in CO2-bearing solutions are reliable. Then, the solubilities of scheelite, scheelite-ferberite, and scheelite-hübnerite in NaCl–H2O–CO2 systems were modeled in this study. Our modeling results suggest that scheelite solubility in CO2-rich fluids is highly dependent on fluid pressure but is insensitive to fluid temperature. A decrease in fluid pressure from lithostatic to hydrostatic levels at a depth of 3–8 km causes CO2 escape and pH rise and precipitates over 70 % of tungsten contents in fluids on average. Therefore, CO2 escape is an efficient mechanism for precipitating scheelite from CO2–rich hydrothermal fluids. The independence of scheelite solubility on temperature at high pressures and the slightly retrograde solubility at low pressures allows CO2–rich hydrothermal fluids to carry a great amount of tungsten far away from its sources. This may be one of reasons why some scheelite deposits occur at greater distances (>500 m) from the granite or extend along its strike for several kilometers. Similar to the cases in NaCl–H2O systems, two mechanisms for scheelite replacing wolframite in CO2–rich fluids are identified, a single decrease in fluid pressure or simple cooling plus an increase in the ratios of total Ca contents to total Fe (or Mn) contents in fluids.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application.
Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.