Automated System for Analysis of OCT Retina Images Development and Testing

IF 0.5 4区 数学 Q3 MATHEMATICS
L. E. Aksenova, K. D. Aksenov, E. V. Kozina, V. V. Myasnikova
{"title":"Automated System for Analysis of OCT Retina Images Development and Testing","authors":"L. E. Aksenova,&nbsp;K. D. Aksenov,&nbsp;E. V. Kozina,&nbsp;V. V. Myasnikova","doi":"10.1134/S1064562423701545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) is a form of AMD that is responsible for most cases of severe vision loss. Anti-VEGF therapy, which is the gold standard for the treatment of this pathology, is accompanied by OCT monitoring. However, this process is hampered by the lack of methods for accurately quantifying OCT images. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the accuracy of the automated calculation of the quantitative characteristics of PED, SRF, and IRF biomarkers. A neural network with U-NET architecture was trained on a manually annotated dataset that included 385 OCT images. The dice coefficient measured on the validation dataset was 0.9, 0.72, and 0.69 for PED, SRF, and IRF. The results of the quantitative calculation of these biomarkers did not statistically differ from the measurements of an ophthalmologist. Comparison of groups with respect to the anatomical outcome of therapy showed that PED height, extent, and square are different for groups with adherence and non-adherence PED; and PED height, PED square, and IRF square are different for groups with nonadherence and tear PED. Thus, the algorithm for the quantitative calculation of biomarkers provides more information for assessing the results of therapy, which can improve the outcomes of treatment in patients with n-AMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":531,"journal":{"name":"Doklady Mathematics","volume":"108 2 supplement","pages":"S310 - S316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Doklady Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1064562423701545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) is a form of AMD that is responsible for most cases of severe vision loss. Anti-VEGF therapy, which is the gold standard for the treatment of this pathology, is accompanied by OCT monitoring. However, this process is hampered by the lack of methods for accurately quantifying OCT images. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the accuracy of the automated calculation of the quantitative characteristics of PED, SRF, and IRF biomarkers. A neural network with U-NET architecture was trained on a manually annotated dataset that included 385 OCT images. The dice coefficient measured on the validation dataset was 0.9, 0.72, and 0.69 for PED, SRF, and IRF. The results of the quantitative calculation of these biomarkers did not statistically differ from the measurements of an ophthalmologist. Comparison of groups with respect to the anatomical outcome of therapy showed that PED height, extent, and square are different for groups with adherence and non-adherence PED; and PED height, PED square, and IRF square are different for groups with nonadherence and tear PED. Thus, the algorithm for the quantitative calculation of biomarkers provides more information for assessing the results of therapy, which can improve the outcomes of treatment in patients with n-AMD.

Abstract Image

开发和测试 OCT 视网膜图像自动分析系统
新生血管性老年黄斑变性(n-AMD)是老年黄斑变性的一种形式,是大多数严重视力丧失病例的罪魁祸首。抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)疗法是治疗这种病变的金标准,同时还需要进行 OCT 监测。然而,由于缺乏准确量化 OCT 图像的方法,这一过程受到了阻碍。本研究旨在开发和评估 PED、SRF 和 IRF 生物标记物定量特征自动计算的准确性。采用 U-NET 架构的神经网络在人工标注的数据集上进行了训练,该数据集包括 385 幅 OCT 图像。在验证数据集上测得的 PED、SRF 和 IRF 骰子系数分别为 0.9、0.72 和 0.69。这些生物标志物的定量计算结果与眼科医生的测量结果没有统计学差异。对各组治疗的解剖结果进行比较后发现,PED 高度、范围和平方在坚持和不坚持 PED 的组别中是不同的;PED 高度、PED 平方和 IRF 平方在不坚持和流泪 PED 的组别中是不同的。因此,生物标志物定量计算算法可为评估治疗效果提供更多信息,从而改善 n-AMD 患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Doklady Mathematics
Doklady Mathematics 数学-数学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Doklady Mathematics is a journal of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences. It contains English translations of papers published in Doklady Akademii Nauk (Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences), which was founded in 1933 and is published 36 times a year. Doklady Mathematics includes the materials from the following areas: mathematics, mathematical physics, computer science, control theory, and computers. It publishes brief scientific reports on previously unpublished significant new research in mathematics and its applications. The main contributors to the journal are Members of the RAS, Corresponding Members of the RAS, and scientists from the former Soviet Union and other foreign countries. Among the contributors are the outstanding Russian mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信