Performance Analysis of NeQuick-G, IRI-2016, IRI-Plas 2017 and AfriTEC Models over the African Region during the Geomagnetic Storm of March 2015

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Jean de Dieu Nibigira, D. Venkata Ratnam, Kondaveeti Sivakrishna
{"title":"Performance Analysis of NeQuick-G, IRI-2016, IRI-Plas 2017 and AfriTEC Models over the African Region during the Geomagnetic Storm of March 2015","authors":"Jean de Dieu Nibigira,&nbsp;D. Venkata Ratnam,&nbsp;Kondaveeti Sivakrishna","doi":"10.1134/S0016793223600601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the diurnal variations of modelled and observed vertical total electron content (VTEC) over the African region (40° N to +40° S, 25° W to 65° E) obtained from ground-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers. The investigations on ionospheric response during the super geomagnetic storm time (March 17 2015) are crucial, especially over African low latitudes. Hence, the performance of ionospheric models has been evaluated in this paper. The VTEC predictability by regional/global ionospheric models (AfriTEC, IRI-2016, IRI-Plas 2017, GIM-CODE, and Nequick-G) is assessed by using root mean square error (RMSE) method and percentage deviation by comparing the GPS/GNSS-VTEC obtained from 10 IGS (International GNSS Service) stations with the modelled-VTEC values over the African region. The peculiarity in VTEC values is evident during the superstorm’s sudden commencement compared to the pre- and post-storm periods. Northern hemisphere GPS station TEC data showed a twin peak in the daily VTEC patterns. The enhanced VTEC values were observed over all the selected 10 IGS stations on the storm day than on other quiet days. Moreover, during the post-storm days (March 18–20, 2015), these VTEC values decreased more than on quiet days over the IGS stations in the southern hemisphere (MBAR, MAYG, HARB, SBOK). On the other hand, during the post-storm days (March 18–20, 2015), the VTEC values remained high over the geomagnetic northern hemisphere (NOT1, SFER, MAS1, CPVG, NKLG). It is worth mentioning that three northern IGS stations (NOT1, SFER, and MAS1) displayed a VTEC increase record of approximately 75–90% due to the extension of equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) during the geomagnetic storm. In contrast, the other northern stations at the EIA trough region (CPVG, BJCO, NKLG) registered a VTEC increment of 7, 26, and 25%, respectively. Southern IGS stations registered an enhancement in VTEC of about 5%. The VTEC maps from AfriTEC, IRI-2016, and Nequick-G were able to predict the feature of EIA at around 20° N/15° S. The GPS-VTEC values at IGS stations located on the geomagnetic EIA crests (in both northern and southern hemispheres) and in the trough (equatorial stations) are higher than those of the IGS stations situated at mid-latitudes. AfriTEC, a regional model, recorded the lowest RMSE values over all the stations. The prediction results show that the regional model performance is better than the global ionospheric models (IRI-2016 and Nequick-G models), especially over EIA latitudes of the African region.</p>","PeriodicalId":55597,"journal":{"name":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793223600601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the diurnal variations of modelled and observed vertical total electron content (VTEC) over the African region (40° N to +40° S, 25° W to 65° E) obtained from ground-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers. The investigations on ionospheric response during the super geomagnetic storm time (March 17 2015) are crucial, especially over African low latitudes. Hence, the performance of ionospheric models has been evaluated in this paper. The VTEC predictability by regional/global ionospheric models (AfriTEC, IRI-2016, IRI-Plas 2017, GIM-CODE, and Nequick-G) is assessed by using root mean square error (RMSE) method and percentage deviation by comparing the GPS/GNSS-VTEC obtained from 10 IGS (International GNSS Service) stations with the modelled-VTEC values over the African region. The peculiarity in VTEC values is evident during the superstorm’s sudden commencement compared to the pre- and post-storm periods. Northern hemisphere GPS station TEC data showed a twin peak in the daily VTEC patterns. The enhanced VTEC values were observed over all the selected 10 IGS stations on the storm day than on other quiet days. Moreover, during the post-storm days (March 18–20, 2015), these VTEC values decreased more than on quiet days over the IGS stations in the southern hemisphere (MBAR, MAYG, HARB, SBOK). On the other hand, during the post-storm days (March 18–20, 2015), the VTEC values remained high over the geomagnetic northern hemisphere (NOT1, SFER, MAS1, CPVG, NKLG). It is worth mentioning that three northern IGS stations (NOT1, SFER, and MAS1) displayed a VTEC increase record of approximately 75–90% due to the extension of equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) during the geomagnetic storm. In contrast, the other northern stations at the EIA trough region (CPVG, BJCO, NKLG) registered a VTEC increment of 7, 26, and 25%, respectively. Southern IGS stations registered an enhancement in VTEC of about 5%. The VTEC maps from AfriTEC, IRI-2016, and Nequick-G were able to predict the feature of EIA at around 20° N/15° S. The GPS-VTEC values at IGS stations located on the geomagnetic EIA crests (in both northern and southern hemispheres) and in the trough (equatorial stations) are higher than those of the IGS stations situated at mid-latitudes. AfriTEC, a regional model, recorded the lowest RMSE values over all the stations. The prediction results show that the regional model performance is better than the global ionospheric models (IRI-2016 and Nequick-G models), especially over EIA latitudes of the African region.

Abstract Image

2015 年 3 月地磁风暴期间非洲地区上空的 NeQuick-G、IRI-2016、IRI-Plas 2017 和 AfriTEC 模式的性能分析
本文研究了从地基全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)接收器获得的非洲地区(北纬40°至南纬+40°,西经25°至东经65°)上空模拟和观测到的垂直电子总含量(VTEC)的日变化。对超级地磁暴期间(2015 年 3 月 17 日)电离层响应的调查至关重要,尤其是在非洲低纬度地区。因此,本文对电离层模型的性能进行了评估。使用均方根误差(RMSE)方法和百分比偏差评估了区域/全球电离层模型(AfriTEC、IRI-2016、IRI-Plas 2017、GIM-CODE 和 Nequick-G)的 VTEC 预测能力,比较了从 10 个 IGS(国际全球导航卫星系统服务机构)站点获得的 GPS/GNSS-VTEC,以及非洲地区的模型 VTEC 值。与风暴前和风暴后相比,超级风暴突然开始时的 VTEC 值的特殊性非常明显。北半球全球定位系统站的 TEC 数据显示出每日 VTEC 模式的双峰现象。在风暴日,所有选定的 10 个 IGS 站的 VTEC 值都比其他平静日要高。此外,在暴风雨后的日子里(2015 年 3 月 18-20 日),南半球 IGS 站(MBAR、MAYG、HARB、SBOK)的 VTEC 值比平日下降得更多。另一方面,在暴风雨后的日子里(2015 年 3 月 18-20 日),北半球地磁台站(NOT1、SFER、MAS1、CPVG、NKLG)的 VTEC 值仍然很高。值得一提的是,由于地磁暴期间赤道电离异常(EIA)的扩展,三个北部 IGS 站(NOT1、SFER 和 MAS1)显示了约 75-90% 的 VTEC 增加记录。相比之下,位于 EIA 谷底区域的其他北部站点(CPVG、BJCO 和 NKLG)的 VTEC 分别增加了 7%、26%和 25%。南部 IGS 站的 VTEC 增量约为 5%。AfriTEC、IRI-2016和Nequick-G的VTEC图能够预测北纬20°/南纬15°附近的EIA特征。位于地磁EIA波峰(南北半球)和波谷(赤道站)的IGS站的GPS-VTEC值高于位于中纬度的IGS站。AfriTEC 是一个区域模式,在所有台站中记录的均方根误差值最低。预测结果表明,区域模式的性能优于全球电离层模式(IRI-2016 和 Nequick-G 模式),特别是在非洲区域的东亚纬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is a bimonthly periodical that covers the fields of interplanetary space; geoeffective solar events; the magnetosphere; the ionosphere; the upper and middle atmosphere; the action of solar variability and activity on atmospheric parameters and climate; the main magnetic field and its secular variations, excursion, and inversion; and other related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信