Generating Topic-Agnostic Conversations With LLMs

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Harshit Sandilya;Naveen Gehlot;Rajesh Kumar;Mahipal Bukya
{"title":"Generating Topic-Agnostic Conversations With LLMs","authors":"Harshit Sandilya;Naveen Gehlot;Rajesh Kumar;Mahipal Bukya","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3473692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conversational systems are important applications of Artificial Intelligence, encompassing a wide variety of implementations, from rule-based systems to complex systems using Natural Language Processing, Deep Neural Networks, and Transformer Architectures. With the growth of these implementations, the quality of conversational data has become a concern. Many attempts have been made to generate such data, focusing primarily on topical conversations. This article presents a generalized framework moving from generating topical conversation towards topic-agnostic conversational data consisting of three Large Language Model instances. Two of these models interact with each other to generate the conversation, while the third one plays the role of a judge to keep the conversation going. The synthetic data created by the proposed method exhibits higher quality and lower toxicity than four of the existing datasets (AmazonQA, Daily Dialog, Open Subtitles, and HUMOD) in terms of six performance measures, namely Toxicity, Severe Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack. Compared to other datasets, the performance analysis of the generated data shows the lowest measures in terms of mean and maximum values. Specifically, the percentages for Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack are 0.27%, 0.04%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.02%, respectively, while the corresponding maximum values are 90.13%, 29.65%, 3.42%, 67.16% and 0.69%. The generated dataset also shows the maximum concentration, with 99.74% of the data in the range of 0-10% toxicity with just a few outliers.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"12 ","pages":"145540-145549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10704625","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10704625/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conversational systems are important applications of Artificial Intelligence, encompassing a wide variety of implementations, from rule-based systems to complex systems using Natural Language Processing, Deep Neural Networks, and Transformer Architectures. With the growth of these implementations, the quality of conversational data has become a concern. Many attempts have been made to generate such data, focusing primarily on topical conversations. This article presents a generalized framework moving from generating topical conversation towards topic-agnostic conversational data consisting of three Large Language Model instances. Two of these models interact with each other to generate the conversation, while the third one plays the role of a judge to keep the conversation going. The synthetic data created by the proposed method exhibits higher quality and lower toxicity than four of the existing datasets (AmazonQA, Daily Dialog, Open Subtitles, and HUMOD) in terms of six performance measures, namely Toxicity, Severe Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack. Compared to other datasets, the performance analysis of the generated data shows the lowest measures in terms of mean and maximum values. Specifically, the percentages for Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack are 0.27%, 0.04%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.02%, respectively, while the corresponding maximum values are 90.13%, 29.65%, 3.42%, 67.16% and 0.69%. The generated dataset also shows the maximum concentration, with 99.74% of the data in the range of 0-10% toxicity with just a few outliers.
用 LLM 生成主题识别对话
会话系统是人工智能的重要应用,包括从基于规则的系统到使用自然语言处理、深度神经网络和变换器架构的复杂系统等多种实现方式。随着这些系统的发展,对话数据的质量已成为一个令人担忧的问题。为了生成这样的数据,人们做了很多尝试,主要集中在话题会话上。本文提出了一个通用框架,从生成主题会话转向生成由三个大型语言模型实例组成的主题明确的会话数据。其中两个模型相互影响以生成对话,而第三个模型则扮演裁判的角色,使对话持续进行。与现有的四个数据集(AmazonQA、每日对话、开放字幕和 HUMOD)相比,在六个性能指标(即毒性、严重毒性、淫秽、威胁、侮辱和身份攻击)方面,拟议方法创建的合成数据表现出更高的质量和更低的毒性。与其他数据集相比,对生成数据的性能分析表明,平均值和最大值的衡量指标最低。具体来说,毒性、淫秽、威胁、侮辱和身份攻击的百分比分别为 0.27%、0.04%、0.02%、0.05% 和 0.02%,而相应的最大值分别为 90.13%、29.65%、3.42%、67.16% 和 0.69%。生成的数据集也显示了最大浓度,99.74% 的数据在 0-10% 的毒性范围内,只有少数异常值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信