{"title":"Generating Topic-Agnostic Conversations With LLMs","authors":"Harshit Sandilya;Naveen Gehlot;Rajesh Kumar;Mahipal Bukya","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3473692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conversational systems are important applications of Artificial Intelligence, encompassing a wide variety of implementations, from rule-based systems to complex systems using Natural Language Processing, Deep Neural Networks, and Transformer Architectures. With the growth of these implementations, the quality of conversational data has become a concern. Many attempts have been made to generate such data, focusing primarily on topical conversations. This article presents a generalized framework moving from generating topical conversation towards topic-agnostic conversational data consisting of three Large Language Model instances. Two of these models interact with each other to generate the conversation, while the third one plays the role of a judge to keep the conversation going. The synthetic data created by the proposed method exhibits higher quality and lower toxicity than four of the existing datasets (AmazonQA, Daily Dialog, Open Subtitles, and HUMOD) in terms of six performance measures, namely Toxicity, Severe Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack. Compared to other datasets, the performance analysis of the generated data shows the lowest measures in terms of mean and maximum values. Specifically, the percentages for Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack are 0.27%, 0.04%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.02%, respectively, while the corresponding maximum values are 90.13%, 29.65%, 3.42%, 67.16% and 0.69%. The generated dataset also shows the maximum concentration, with 99.74% of the data in the range of 0-10% toxicity with just a few outliers.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"12 ","pages":"145540-145549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10704625","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10704625/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Conversational systems are important applications of Artificial Intelligence, encompassing a wide variety of implementations, from rule-based systems to complex systems using Natural Language Processing, Deep Neural Networks, and Transformer Architectures. With the growth of these implementations, the quality of conversational data has become a concern. Many attempts have been made to generate such data, focusing primarily on topical conversations. This article presents a generalized framework moving from generating topical conversation towards topic-agnostic conversational data consisting of three Large Language Model instances. Two of these models interact with each other to generate the conversation, while the third one plays the role of a judge to keep the conversation going. The synthetic data created by the proposed method exhibits higher quality and lower toxicity than four of the existing datasets (AmazonQA, Daily Dialog, Open Subtitles, and HUMOD) in terms of six performance measures, namely Toxicity, Severe Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack. Compared to other datasets, the performance analysis of the generated data shows the lowest measures in terms of mean and maximum values. Specifically, the percentages for Toxicity, Obscene, Threat, Insult, and Identity Attack are 0.27%, 0.04%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.02%, respectively, while the corresponding maximum values are 90.13%, 29.65%, 3.42%, 67.16% and 0.69%. The generated dataset also shows the maximum concentration, with 99.74% of the data in the range of 0-10% toxicity with just a few outliers.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.