Enhancing EEG Signal Classification With a Novel Random Subset Channel Selection Approach: Applications in Taste, Odor, and Motor Imagery Analysis

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Amir Naser;Önder Aydemir
{"title":"Enhancing EEG Signal Classification With a Novel Random Subset Channel Selection Approach: Applications in Taste, Odor, and Motor Imagery Analysis","authors":"Amir Naser;Önder Aydemir","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3473810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses various datasets to evaluate the performance of feature extraction and classification methods for EEG signals. The EEG signals analyzed in this research are based on taste, odor, and motor imagery, employing novel methods to interpret these complex signals accurately. Three datasets were used in this study: taste-based EEG signals from 10 healthy subjects, odor-based EEG signals from 5 subjects, and motor imagery EEG data from 29 subjects. Feature extraction methods such as Hilbert Transform (HT) for taste, Wavelet Packet Decomposition (WPD) for odor, and HT for motor imagery were applied. Sequential forward and backward search methods were compared with a newly proposed Random Subset Channel Selection (RSCS) method to determine the most effective channels. For the taste dataset, using the RSCS method, an average classification accuracy of 82% was achieved with a significant reduction in the number of channels, demonstrating a 37.9% improvement over using all channels. In the odor dataset, the proposed method achieved an average accuracy of 99.28% for open-nose conditions and 97.49% for closed-nose conditions, with an 86.3% improvement in classification accuracy and an 89.09% reduction in computational complexity. The RSCS method achieved an average accuracy of 81.56% for the motor imagery dataset, showing superior performance compared to sequential methods. The proposed RSCS method outperforms traditional sequential methods by improving classification accuracy and reducing computational complexity across different types of EEG datasets. This method holds promise for enhancing BCI system performance, significantly improving the detection and early diagnosis of neurological conditions.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"12 ","pages":"145608-145618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10704658","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10704658/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses various datasets to evaluate the performance of feature extraction and classification methods for EEG signals. The EEG signals analyzed in this research are based on taste, odor, and motor imagery, employing novel methods to interpret these complex signals accurately. Three datasets were used in this study: taste-based EEG signals from 10 healthy subjects, odor-based EEG signals from 5 subjects, and motor imagery EEG data from 29 subjects. Feature extraction methods such as Hilbert Transform (HT) for taste, Wavelet Packet Decomposition (WPD) for odor, and HT for motor imagery were applied. Sequential forward and backward search methods were compared with a newly proposed Random Subset Channel Selection (RSCS) method to determine the most effective channels. For the taste dataset, using the RSCS method, an average classification accuracy of 82% was achieved with a significant reduction in the number of channels, demonstrating a 37.9% improvement over using all channels. In the odor dataset, the proposed method achieved an average accuracy of 99.28% for open-nose conditions and 97.49% for closed-nose conditions, with an 86.3% improvement in classification accuracy and an 89.09% reduction in computational complexity. The RSCS method achieved an average accuracy of 81.56% for the motor imagery dataset, showing superior performance compared to sequential methods. The proposed RSCS method outperforms traditional sequential methods by improving classification accuracy and reducing computational complexity across different types of EEG datasets. This method holds promise for enhancing BCI system performance, significantly improving the detection and early diagnosis of neurological conditions.
利用新型随机子集通道选择方法增强脑电信号分类:味觉、嗅觉和运动意象分析中的应用
本研究利用各种数据集评估脑电信号特征提取和分类方法的性能。本研究分析的脑电信号基于味觉、气味和运动图像,采用了新颖的方法来准确解读这些复杂的信号。本研究使用了三个数据集:10 名健康受试者的味觉脑电信号、5 名受试者的气味脑电信号和 29 名受试者的运动意象脑电图数据。特征提取方法包括味觉的希尔伯特变换(HT)、气味的小波包分解(WPD)和运动图像的 HT。为了确定最有效的通道,将顺序前向搜索和后向搜索方法与新提出的随机子集通道选择(RSCS)方法进行了比较。在味觉数据集中,使用 RSCS 方法,平均分类准确率达到了 82%,通道数量显著减少,比使用所有通道提高了 37.9%。在气味数据集中,所提出的方法在开鼻条件下的平均准确率为 99.28%,在闭鼻条件下的平均准确率为 97.49%,分类准确率提高了 86.3%,计算复杂度降低了 89.09%。RSCS 方法在运动图像数据集上的平均准确率达到了 81.56%,与顺序方法相比表现出更优越的性能。在不同类型的脑电图数据集上,所提出的 RSCS 方法提高了分类准确率,降低了计算复杂度,因此优于传统的序列方法。这种方法有望提高 BCI 系统的性能,显著改善神经系统疾病的检测和早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信