Machine Learning in Network Intrusion Detection: A Cross-Dataset Generalization Study

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Marco Cantone;Claudio Marrocco;Alessandro Bria
{"title":"Machine Learning in Network Intrusion Detection: A Cross-Dataset Generalization Study","authors":"Marco Cantone;Claudio Marrocco;Alessandro Bria","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3472907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) are a fundamental tool in cybersecurity. Their ability to generalize across diverse networks is a critical factor in their effectiveness and a prerequisite for real-world applications. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis on the generalization of machine-learning-based NIDS through an extensive experimentation in a cross-dataset framework. We employ four machine learning classifiers and utilize four datasets acquired from different networks: CIC-IDS-2017, CSE-CIC-IDS2018, LycoS-IDS2017, and LycoS-Unicas-IDS2018. Notably, the last dataset is a novel contribution, where we apply corrections based on LycoS-IDS2017 to the well-known CSE-CIC-IDS2018 dataset. The results show nearly perfect classification performance when the models are trained and tested on the same dataset. However, when training and testing the models in a cross-dataset fashion, the classification accuracy is largely commensurate with random chance except for a few combinations of attacks and datasets. We employ data visualization techniques in order to provide valuable insights on the patterns in the data. Our analysis unveils the presence of anomalies in the data that directly hinder the classifiers capability to generalize the learned knowledge to new scenarios. This study enhances our comprehension of the generalization capabilities of machine-learning-based NIDS, highlighting the significance of acknowledging data heterogeneity.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"12 ","pages":"144489-144508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10704637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10704637/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) are a fundamental tool in cybersecurity. Their ability to generalize across diverse networks is a critical factor in their effectiveness and a prerequisite for real-world applications. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis on the generalization of machine-learning-based NIDS through an extensive experimentation in a cross-dataset framework. We employ four machine learning classifiers and utilize four datasets acquired from different networks: CIC-IDS-2017, CSE-CIC-IDS2018, LycoS-IDS2017, and LycoS-Unicas-IDS2018. Notably, the last dataset is a novel contribution, where we apply corrections based on LycoS-IDS2017 to the well-known CSE-CIC-IDS2018 dataset. The results show nearly perfect classification performance when the models are trained and tested on the same dataset. However, when training and testing the models in a cross-dataset fashion, the classification accuracy is largely commensurate with random chance except for a few combinations of attacks and datasets. We employ data visualization techniques in order to provide valuable insights on the patterns in the data. Our analysis unveils the presence of anomalies in the data that directly hinder the classifiers capability to generalize the learned knowledge to new scenarios. This study enhances our comprehension of the generalization capabilities of machine-learning-based NIDS, highlighting the significance of acknowledging data heterogeneity.
网络入侵检测中的机器学习:跨数据集泛化研究
网络入侵检测系统(NIDS)是网络安全的基本工具。它们在不同网络中的泛化能力是其有效性的关键因素,也是实际应用的先决条件。在本研究中,我们通过跨数据集框架的广泛实验,对基于机器学习的 NIDS 的泛化能力进行了全面分析。我们采用了四种机器学习分类器,并利用从不同网络获取的四个数据集:CIC-IDS-2017、CSE-CIC-IDS2018、LycoS-IDS2017 和 LycoS-Unicas-IDS2018。值得注意的是,最后一个数据集是一个新贡献,我们将基于 LycoS-IDS2017 的修正应用于著名的 CSE-CIC-IDS2018 数据集。结果表明,当模型在同一个数据集上进行训练和测试时,分类性能近乎完美。然而,当以跨数据集的方式训练和测试模型时,除了少数几种攻击和数据集组合外,分类准确率在很大程度上与随机概率相当。我们采用了数据可视化技术,以便为数据中的模式提供有价值的见解。我们的分析揭示了数据中存在的异常现象,这些异常现象直接阻碍了分类器将所学知识推广到新场景的能力。这项研究增强了我们对基于机器学习的 NIDS 的泛化能力的理解,强调了承认数据异质性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信