Interaction between fluticasone furoate and umeclidinium in passively sensitized isolated human airways

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Maria Gabriella Matera , Luigino Calzetta , Barbara Rinaldi , Carmela Belardo , Francesco Facciolo , Filippo Tommaso Gallina , Clive P. Page , Mario Cazzola , Paola Rogliani
{"title":"Interaction between fluticasone furoate and umeclidinium in passively sensitized isolated human airways","authors":"Maria Gabriella Matera ,&nbsp;Luigino Calzetta ,&nbsp;Barbara Rinaldi ,&nbsp;Carmela Belardo ,&nbsp;Francesco Facciolo ,&nbsp;Filippo Tommaso Gallina ,&nbsp;Clive P. Page ,&nbsp;Mario Cazzola ,&nbsp;Paola Rogliani","doi":"10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asthma management often includes inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), with additional controllers like long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) for severe cases. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the pharmacological interaction between various concentrations of fluticasone furoate (FF) and umeclidinium (UME) in isolated human airways to determine the nature of their interaction, whether synergistic or additive. Medium bronchi and small airways obtained from patients undergoing lobectomy were passively sensitized to mimic asthmatic conditions. The effects of FF and UME, alone and in combination, on airway relaxation were evaluated using histamine-induced contraction and electrical field stimulation. Pharmacological interactions were analyzed using the Bliss Independence theory. Results indicated that FF induced a partial, concentration-dependent relaxation of sensitized airways, while UME induced a larger relaxation in medium bronchi but a weaker effect in small airways. The combination of FF and UME resulted in significantly greater relaxation than either drug alone, demonstrating synergism at high concentrations in medium bronchi but only additive effects in small airways. This study suggests that higher doses of FF might be necessary in a fixed dose combination to achieve optimal synergistic bronchodilation with UME. Future research should focus on clinical trials to confirm these findings and explore the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions, potentially improving personalized asthma therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20799,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094553924000476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asthma management often includes inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), with additional controllers like long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) for severe cases. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the pharmacological interaction between various concentrations of fluticasone furoate (FF) and umeclidinium (UME) in isolated human airways to determine the nature of their interaction, whether synergistic or additive. Medium bronchi and small airways obtained from patients undergoing lobectomy were passively sensitized to mimic asthmatic conditions. The effects of FF and UME, alone and in combination, on airway relaxation were evaluated using histamine-induced contraction and electrical field stimulation. Pharmacological interactions were analyzed using the Bliss Independence theory. Results indicated that FF induced a partial, concentration-dependent relaxation of sensitized airways, while UME induced a larger relaxation in medium bronchi but a weaker effect in small airways. The combination of FF and UME resulted in significantly greater relaxation than either drug alone, demonstrating synergism at high concentrations in medium bronchi but only additive effects in small airways. This study suggests that higher doses of FF might be necessary in a fixed dose combination to achieve optimal synergistic bronchodilation with UME. Future research should focus on clinical trials to confirm these findings and explore the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions, potentially improving personalized asthma therapy.
糠酸氟替卡松和乌甲素在被动致敏的离体人呼吸道中的相互作用。
哮喘治疗通常包括吸入式皮质类固醇(ICS),严重病例还需使用长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)等其他控制药物。本研究的主要目的是调查不同浓度的糠酸氟替卡松(FF)和乌甲素(UME)在离体人体气道中的药理作用,以确定它们之间的作用性质,是协同作用还是相加作用。从肺叶切除术患者身上获取的中支气管和小气道被动致敏,以模拟哮喘病情。使用组胺诱导的收缩和电场刺激评估了 FF 和 UME 单独或联合使用对气道松弛的影响。使用布利斯独立理论分析了药理作用。结果表明,FF 可诱导敏化气道产生部分浓度依赖性松弛,而 UME 可诱导中支气管产生较大的松弛,但对小气道的作用较弱。FF 和 UME 联合使用所产生的松弛效果明显大于单独使用其中一种药物所产生的效果,这表明在中支气管中使用高浓度药物时会产生协同作用,但在小气道中仅会产生相加作用。这项研究表明,在固定剂量的联合用药中,可能需要更高的 FF 剂量,才能与 UME 达到最佳的协同支气管舒张效果。未来的研究应侧重于临床试验,以证实这些发现并探索这些相互作用的分子机制,从而改进个性化的哮喘治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (formerly Pulmonary Pharmacology) is concerned with lung pharmacology from molecular to clinical aspects. The subject matter encompasses the major diseases of the lung including asthma, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary circulation, ARDS, carcinoma, bronchitis, emphysema and drug delivery. Laboratory and clinical research on man and animals will be considered including studies related to chemotherapy of cancer, tuberculosis and infection. In addition to original research papers the journal will include review articles and book reviews. Research Areas Include: • All major diseases of the lung • Physiology • Pathology • Drug delivery • Metabolism • Pulmonary Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信