Optimization and intra-assay validation of a multiparametric flow cytometric test for monitoring circulating TREGs.

4区 生物学 Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Methods in cell biology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1016/bs.mcb.2024.06.005
Iole Macchia, Floriana Iacobone, Francesca Urbani
{"title":"Optimization and intra-assay validation of a multiparametric flow cytometric test for monitoring circulating TREGs.","authors":"Iole Macchia, Floriana Iacobone, Francesca Urbani","doi":"10.1016/bs.mcb.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) represents an essential tool for immune monitoring, and validation of MFC panels is a fundamental prerequisite in routine laboratory settings as well as for translational and clinical research purposes. Regulatory T cells (TREGs) constitute a subset of CD4+ effector T cells that modulate the immune response in numerous settings, including autoimmune disease, allergy, microbial infection, tumor immunity, transplantation, and more. These cells comprise a small fraction of total CD4+ T cells in human peripheral blood and mouse spleen. In oncology, TREG cells are highly relevant, as they are involved in the suppression of the anti-tumor response in many types of cancer, to the extent that the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for clinical use in humans was a monoclonal antibody directed against CTLA-4, a molecule functionally associated with TREGs. Due to all these factors, robust assays are mandatory to accurately determine TREG cell frequency and function. Here, we describe the validation of an 8-color flow-cytometry protocol for TREG detection and analysis in a real-world laboratory scenario. The entire process includes the workflow plan and the standard operating procedure resembling each phase, from the panel design to the staining, acquisition, and analysis steps. Validation is planned to be performed in replicates on fresh whole blood samples derived from multiple healthy subjects. The analytical validity of the TREG cell assay is ensured by testing the intra-assay accuracy. The detailed procedure for the entire process is accompanied by important troubleshooting suggestions and other useful tips.</p>","PeriodicalId":18437,"journal":{"name":"Methods in cell biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in cell biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcb.2024.06.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) represents an essential tool for immune monitoring, and validation of MFC panels is a fundamental prerequisite in routine laboratory settings as well as for translational and clinical research purposes. Regulatory T cells (TREGs) constitute a subset of CD4+ effector T cells that modulate the immune response in numerous settings, including autoimmune disease, allergy, microbial infection, tumor immunity, transplantation, and more. These cells comprise a small fraction of total CD4+ T cells in human peripheral blood and mouse spleen. In oncology, TREG cells are highly relevant, as they are involved in the suppression of the anti-tumor response in many types of cancer, to the extent that the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for clinical use in humans was a monoclonal antibody directed against CTLA-4, a molecule functionally associated with TREGs. Due to all these factors, robust assays are mandatory to accurately determine TREG cell frequency and function. Here, we describe the validation of an 8-color flow-cytometry protocol for TREG detection and analysis in a real-world laboratory scenario. The entire process includes the workflow plan and the standard operating procedure resembling each phase, from the panel design to the staining, acquisition, and analysis steps. Validation is planned to be performed in replicates on fresh whole blood samples derived from multiple healthy subjects. The analytical validity of the TREG cell assay is ensured by testing the intra-assay accuracy. The detailed procedure for the entire process is accompanied by important troubleshooting suggestions and other useful tips.

用于监测循环 TREGs 的多参数流式细胞检测法的优化和测定内验证。
多参数流式细胞术(MFC)是免疫监测的重要工具,而 MFC 面板的验证是常规实验室设置以及转化和临床研究的基本前提。调节性 T 细胞(TREGs)是 CD4+ 效应 T 细胞的一个亚群,在自身免疫性疾病、过敏、微生物感染、肿瘤免疫、移植等多种情况下调节免疫反应。这些细胞只占人体外周血和小鼠脾脏中 CD4+ T 细胞总数的一小部分。在肿瘤学中,TREG 细胞具有高度相关性,因为它们参与抑制多种类型癌症的抗肿瘤反应,以至于第一个被批准用于人类临床的免疫检查点抑制剂就是针对 CTLA-4 的单克隆抗体,而 CTLA-4 是一种在功能上与 TREG 相关的分子。由于所有这些因素,要准确测定 TREG 细胞的频率和功能,必须采用可靠的检测方法。在此,我们介绍了在实际实验室场景中用于 TREG 检测和分析的 8 色流式细胞仪方案的验证。整个过程包括从面板设计到染色、采集和分析步骤的每个阶段的工作流程计划和标准操作程序。计划在多个健康受试者的新鲜全血样本上进行重复验证。TREG 细胞检测的分析有效性是通过测试检测内部的准确性来保证的。整个过程的详细步骤附有重要的故障排除建议和其他有用提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in cell biology
Methods in cell biology 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over fifty years, Methods in Cell Biology has helped researchers answer the question "What method should I use to study this cell biology problem?" Edited by leaders in the field, each thematic volume provides proven, state-of-art techniques, along with relevant historical background and theory, to aid researchers in efficient design and effective implementation of experimental methodologies. Over its many years of publication, Methods in Cell Biology has built up a deep library of biological methods to study model developmental organisms, organelles and cell systems, as well as comprehensive coverage of microscopy and other analytical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信