Three-month outcomes and cost-effectiveness of interferon gamma-1b in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of the PREV-HAP trial.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Marwan Bouras, Philippe Tessier, Cécile Poulain, Solène Schirr-Bonnans, Antoine Roquilly
{"title":"Three-month outcomes and cost-effectiveness of interferon gamma-1b in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of the PREV-HAP trial.","authors":"Marwan Bouras, Philippe Tessier, Cécile Poulain, Solène Schirr-Bonnans, Antoine Roquilly","doi":"10.1186/s40560-024-00753-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interferon gamma‑1b has been proposed to treat critical illness-induced immunosuppression. We aimed to determine the effects on 90-day outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of interferon gamma‑1b compared to placebo in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was embedded in the \"PREV-HAP trial\", a multicenter, placebo‑controlled, randomized trial, which randomly assigned critically ill adults under mechanical ventilation to receive interferon gamma or placebo. The CEA compared interferon-gamma with placebo using a collective perspective at a 90-day time horizon. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed in terms of adjusted cost per adjusted Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) gained. QALYs were estimated from the responses of patients and proxy respondents to the health-related quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-3L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 109 patients in the PREV-HAP trial were included in the CEA. At day 90, all-cause mortality rates were 23.6% in the interferon group and 25% in the placebo group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.88 (0.40 -1.93) p = 0.67). The difference in the mean adjusted costs per patient at 90 days was €-1.638 (95%CI €-17.534 to €11.968) in favor of interferon gamma-1b. The mean difference in adjusted QALYs between interferon gamma-1b and the placebo group was + 0.019 (95%CI -0.005 to 0.043). The probability that interferon gamma-1b was cost-effective ranged from 0.60 to 0.71 for a willingness to pay a QALY between €20k and €150k for the base case analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early administration of interferon gamma might be cost-effective in critically ill patients supporting the realization of other studies on this treatment. However, the generalization of the findings should be considered cautiously, given the small sample size due to the premature end of PREV-HAP. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04793568, Registration date: 2021-02-24.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"12 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11468134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00753-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interferon gamma‑1b has been proposed to treat critical illness-induced immunosuppression. We aimed to determine the effects on 90-day outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of interferon gamma‑1b compared to placebo in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was embedded in the "PREV-HAP trial", a multicenter, placebo‑controlled, randomized trial, which randomly assigned critically ill adults under mechanical ventilation to receive interferon gamma or placebo. The CEA compared interferon-gamma with placebo using a collective perspective at a 90-day time horizon. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed in terms of adjusted cost per adjusted Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) gained. QALYs were estimated from the responses of patients and proxy respondents to the health-related quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-3L.

Results: The 109 patients in the PREV-HAP trial were included in the CEA. At day 90, all-cause mortality rates were 23.6% in the interferon group and 25% in the placebo group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.88 (0.40 -1.93) p = 0.67). The difference in the mean adjusted costs per patient at 90 days was €-1.638 (95%CI €-17.534 to €11.968) in favor of interferon gamma-1b. The mean difference in adjusted QALYs between interferon gamma-1b and the placebo group was + 0.019 (95%CI -0.005 to 0.043). The probability that interferon gamma-1b was cost-effective ranged from 0.60 to 0.71 for a willingness to pay a QALY between €20k and €150k for the base case analysis.

Conclusion: Early administration of interferon gamma might be cost-effective in critically ill patients supporting the realization of other studies on this treatment. However, the generalization of the findings should be considered cautiously, given the small sample size due to the premature end of PREV-HAP. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04793568, Registration date: 2021-02-24.

重症患者使用γ-1b干扰素三个月的疗效和成本效益:PREV-HAP试验的二次分析。
背景:有人建议用γ-1b干扰素治疗危重病人引起的免疫抑制。我们旨在确定干扰素 gamma-1b 与安慰剂相比对机械通气危重症患者 90 天预后的影响以及成本效益:PREV-HAP试验 "是一项多中心、安慰剂对照随机试验,随机分配接受机械通气的成人重症患者接受γ干扰素或安慰剂治疗。CEA 以 90 天为时间跨度,从集体角度对干扰素-γ 和安慰剂进行了比较。主要结果是增量成本效益比 (ICER),以每获得 1 个调整后质量调整生命年 (QALY) 的调整后成本表示。QALYs根据患者和代理受访者对健康相关生活质量问卷EQ-5D-3L的回答进行估算:PREV-HAP试验的109名患者被纳入CEA。第 90 天时,干扰素组的全因死亡率为 23.6%,安慰剂组为 25%(比值比 (OR) = 0.88 (0.40 -1.93) p = 0.67)。每名患者 90 天的平均调整成本差异为 1.638 欧元(95%CI 为 17.534 欧元至 11.968 欧元),干扰素 gamma-1b 更优。干扰素γ-1b组与安慰剂组的调整后QALYs平均差异为+ 0.019(95%CI为-0.005至0.043)。在基础病例分析中,如果QALY的支付意愿在2万欧元至15万欧元之间,则干扰素γ-1b具有成本效益的概率为0.60至0.71:结论:对重症患者而言,早期使用γ干扰素可能具有成本效益,这与其他有关该疗法的研究结果相吻合。然而,由于PREV-HAP过早结束,样本量较小,因此应谨慎考虑研究结果的推广。试验注册 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04793568,注册日期:2021-02-24。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信