Strategies for implementation of a transmural fall-prevention care pathway for older adults with fall-related injuries at the emergency department.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
W M Charmant, B A M Snoeker, H P J van Hout, E Geleijn, N van der Velde, C Veenhof, P W B Nanayakkara
{"title":"Strategies for implementation of a transmural fall-prevention care pathway for older adults with fall-related injuries at the emergency department.","authors":"W M Charmant, B A M Snoeker, H P J van Hout, E Geleijn, N van der Velde, C Veenhof, P W B Nanayakkara","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01085-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although indicated, referrals for multifactorial fall risk assessments in older adults with fall related injuries presenting at the emergency department (ED) are not standard. The implementation of a transmural fall-prevention care pathway (TFCP) could bridge this gap by guiding patients to multifactorial fall risk assessments and personalised multidomain interventions in primary care. This study aims to develop and evaluate implementation strategies for a TFCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this mixed-methods implementation study, strategies were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change Matching Tool. These were evaluated with patients, involved healthcare professionals, and other stakeholders using the Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the RE-AIM framework in two cycles. Patients of the TFCP consisted of frail community dwelling individuals aged 65 and over presenting at the ED with fall related injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first implementation phase, strategies were focussed on assessing readiness, adaptability, local champions, incentives and education for all involved healthcare professions in the TFCP. Only 34.4% of eligible patients were informed of the TFCP at the ED, 30.6% agreed to a fall risk assessment and 8.3% patients received the fall risk assessment. In the second phase, this improved to 67.1%, 64.6%, and 35.4%, respectively. Strategies in this phase focussed on adaptability, obtaining sustainable financial resources, local champions, assessing readiness, and education. The implementation was facilitated by strategies related to awareness, champion recruitment, educational meetings, adaptability of TFCP elements and evaluations of facilitators and barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study outlined strategies for implementing TFCPs in EDs. Strategies included increasing awareness, utilising local champions, educational initiatives, adaptability of the TFCP, and continuous monitoring of facilitators and barriers. These insights can serve as a blueprint for enhancing fall prevention efforts for older adults in emergency department settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01085-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although indicated, referrals for multifactorial fall risk assessments in older adults with fall related injuries presenting at the emergency department (ED) are not standard. The implementation of a transmural fall-prevention care pathway (TFCP) could bridge this gap by guiding patients to multifactorial fall risk assessments and personalised multidomain interventions in primary care. This study aims to develop and evaluate implementation strategies for a TFCP.

Methods: In this mixed-methods implementation study, strategies were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change Matching Tool. These were evaluated with patients, involved healthcare professionals, and other stakeholders using the Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the RE-AIM framework in two cycles. Patients of the TFCP consisted of frail community dwelling individuals aged 65 and over presenting at the ED with fall related injuries.

Results: During the first implementation phase, strategies were focussed on assessing readiness, adaptability, local champions, incentives and education for all involved healthcare professions in the TFCP. Only 34.4% of eligible patients were informed of the TFCP at the ED, 30.6% agreed to a fall risk assessment and 8.3% patients received the fall risk assessment. In the second phase, this improved to 67.1%, 64.6%, and 35.4%, respectively. Strategies in this phase focussed on adaptability, obtaining sustainable financial resources, local champions, assessing readiness, and education. The implementation was facilitated by strategies related to awareness, champion recruitment, educational meetings, adaptability of TFCP elements and evaluations of facilitators and barriers.

Conclusion: The study outlined strategies for implementing TFCPs in EDs. Strategies included increasing awareness, utilising local champions, educational initiatives, adaptability of the TFCP, and continuous monitoring of facilitators and barriers. These insights can serve as a blueprint for enhancing fall prevention efforts for older adults in emergency department settings.

在急诊科为跌倒受伤的老年人实施跨部门跌倒预防护理路径的策略。
背景:虽然有必要对急诊科(ED)就诊的跌倒受伤老年人进行多因素跌倒风险评估,但转诊并不规范。实施跨领域跌倒预防护理路径(TFCP)可弥合这一差距,引导患者接受多因素跌倒风险评估,并在初级保健中采取个性化的多领域干预措施。本研究旨在制定和评估 TFCP 的实施策略:在这项混合方法实施研究中,使用实施研究专家建议实施变革匹配工具的综合框架来制定策略。在两个周期内,使用 RE-AIM 框架的 "接触、采用、实施和维护 "对患者、相关医疗保健专业人员和其他利益相关者进行了评估。TFCP 的患者包括 65 岁及以上因跌倒受伤而到急诊室就诊的体弱社区居民:在第一实施阶段,策略的重点是评估准备情况、适应性、当地拥护者、激励措施以及对所有参与 TFCP 的医疗保健专业人员的教育。只有 34.4% 的符合条件的患者在急诊室了解了 TFCP,30.6% 的患者同意进行跌倒风险评估,8.3% 的患者接受了跌倒风险评估。在第二阶段,这一比例分别提高到 67.1%、64.6% 和 35.4%。这一阶段的战略重点在于适应性、获得可持续的财政资源、当地支持者、评估准备情况和教育。与提高认识、招募拥护者、教育会议、适应 TFCP 要素以及评估促进因素和障碍有关的战略促进了实施工作:本研究概述了在急诊室实施 TFCP 的策略。这些策略包括提高意识、利用当地倡导者、开展教育活动、调整 TFCP 以及持续监测促进因素和障碍。这些见解可作为在急诊科环境中加强老年人跌倒预防工作的蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信