Semaglutide shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes with any forms of heart failure

Iskandar Idris DM
{"title":"Semaglutide shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes with any forms of heart failure","authors":"Iskandar Idris DM","doi":"10.1002/doi2.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous studies have shown the efficacy and effectiveness of semaglutide to help to reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE) such as heart attacks and strokes for people with obesity or who were overweight and had cardiovascular disease.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Whether the benefit persists specifically in patients with heart failure at baseline is unclear. This is important since a diagnosis of heart failure is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p>A new study published in <i>The Lancet</i>, have now found similar cardiovascular benefits for a subgroup of study participants who were determined to have heart failure at the start of the trial.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>The study investigated data from 4286 people—out of a total of 17 605 from the landmark Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes (SELECT) trial who were randomly assigned either semaglutide or a placebo. Patients were followed up over an average of more than 3 years.</p><p>Their analysis found that semaglutide was associated with a 28% reduction in major adverse cardiac events (12.3% in the placebo group compared to 9.1% in the semaglutide group). Among people with pre-existing heart failure, there was a 24% reduction in cardiovascular disease-related deaths and a 19% reduction in deaths of any cause. In addition, the study found the clinical benefit of semaglutide was observed irrespective of type of heart failure (i.e., heart failure with sreduced and preserved ejection fraction). It was also found to be independent of age, sex, baseline BMI, and clinical status. Serious adverse events were reported more frequently in the placebo group than in the semaglutide group. Treatment was discontinued more often in the semaglutide group, primarily driven by the well recognized gastrointestinal disorders (14.7% vs. 9.0% in the heart failure groups; and 17.2% vs. 7.9% in non-heart failure groups).</p><p>This study therefore extends the observation from the previously published SELECT which showed benefits of semaglutide for people with cardiovascular disease who had obesity or were overweight. This new study reports that among similar patient group with obesity or overweight, people with heart failure did as well as people without heart failure in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular related death or any cause of mortality. This is important as there were some uncertainties regarding the safety of Liraglutide, another Glucagon like peptide-1 analogue in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>So where does evidence from this study sit in our current strategy to manage heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes? It is important to note that Semaglutide is not licenced for the management of heart failure. Conversely, evidence based from the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor suggest clear benefit for patients with heart failure, irrespective of disease status or whether heart failure is associated with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. In addition, the exact mechanism for the benefits of Semaglutide to improve cardiovascular benefits in people with heart failure remains unclear. Nonetheless, the observation that semaglutide reduced all cause mortality in all heart failure groups suggest some pleotropic effects of Semaglutide to improve heart failure outcome, including by reducing adiposity, which is an important risk factor for heart failure progression. A noted limitation with this study is that the majority of study participants were male and a high proportion were white, which limits the ability to generalize treatment outcome.</p><p>While this study support the use of semaglutide on top of usual care to reduce risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, further study is first required to evaluate the effects of semaglutide on heart failure-related outcomes. These data is available for the SGLT2 inhibitors. As SELECT was not a dedicated heart failure trial, the study results cannot be extrapolated to patients with heart failure in general. Until then, SGLT2 inhibitor should remain the first treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes with heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":100370,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now","volume":"2 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/doi2.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/doi2.70004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have shown the efficacy and effectiveness of semaglutide to help to reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE) such as heart attacks and strokes for people with obesity or who were overweight and had cardiovascular disease.1 Whether the benefit persists specifically in patients with heart failure at baseline is unclear. This is important since a diagnosis of heart failure is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

A new study published in The Lancet, have now found similar cardiovascular benefits for a subgroup of study participants who were determined to have heart failure at the start of the trial.2

The study investigated data from 4286 people—out of a total of 17 605 from the landmark Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes (SELECT) trial who were randomly assigned either semaglutide or a placebo. Patients were followed up over an average of more than 3 years.

Their analysis found that semaglutide was associated with a 28% reduction in major adverse cardiac events (12.3% in the placebo group compared to 9.1% in the semaglutide group). Among people with pre-existing heart failure, there was a 24% reduction in cardiovascular disease-related deaths and a 19% reduction in deaths of any cause. In addition, the study found the clinical benefit of semaglutide was observed irrespective of type of heart failure (i.e., heart failure with sreduced and preserved ejection fraction). It was also found to be independent of age, sex, baseline BMI, and clinical status. Serious adverse events were reported more frequently in the placebo group than in the semaglutide group. Treatment was discontinued more often in the semaglutide group, primarily driven by the well recognized gastrointestinal disorders (14.7% vs. 9.0% in the heart failure groups; and 17.2% vs. 7.9% in non-heart failure groups).

This study therefore extends the observation from the previously published SELECT which showed benefits of semaglutide for people with cardiovascular disease who had obesity or were overweight. This new study reports that among similar patient group with obesity or overweight, people with heart failure did as well as people without heart failure in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular related death or any cause of mortality. This is important as there were some uncertainties regarding the safety of Liraglutide, another Glucagon like peptide-1 analogue in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.3

So where does evidence from this study sit in our current strategy to manage heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes? It is important to note that Semaglutide is not licenced for the management of heart failure. Conversely, evidence based from the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor suggest clear benefit for patients with heart failure, irrespective of disease status or whether heart failure is associated with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. In addition, the exact mechanism for the benefits of Semaglutide to improve cardiovascular benefits in people with heart failure remains unclear. Nonetheless, the observation that semaglutide reduced all cause mortality in all heart failure groups suggest some pleotropic effects of Semaglutide to improve heart failure outcome, including by reducing adiposity, which is an important risk factor for heart failure progression. A noted limitation with this study is that the majority of study participants were male and a high proportion were white, which limits the ability to generalize treatment outcome.

While this study support the use of semaglutide on top of usual care to reduce risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, further study is first required to evaluate the effects of semaglutide on heart failure-related outcomes. These data is available for the SGLT2 inhibitors. As SELECT was not a dedicated heart failure trial, the study results cannot be extrapolated to patients with heart failure in general. Until then, SGLT2 inhibitor should remain the first treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes with heart failure.

塞马鲁肽可改善任何形式心力衰竭的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管预后
以往的研究表明,对于肥胖或超重并患有心血管疾病的人来说,塞马鲁肽有助于减少心脏病发作和中风等重大心脏不良事件(MACE)的疗效和有效性1。2 该研究调查了具有里程碑意义的塞马鲁肽和心血管结果(SELECT)试验中总共 17 605 人中的 4286 人的数据,这些人被随机分配到塞马鲁肽或安慰剂中。他们的分析发现,塞马鲁肽可使重大心脏不良事件减少28%(安慰剂组为12.3%,塞马鲁肽组为9.1%)。在原有心衰患者中,心血管疾病相关死亡人数减少了24%,任何原因导致的死亡人数减少了19%。此外,研究还发现,无论心衰类型如何(即射血分数减低和射血分数保留的心衰),都能观察到塞马鲁肽的临床益处。研究还发现,这种临床获益与年龄、性别、基线体重指数和临床状态无关。据报告,安慰剂组发生严重不良事件的频率高于塞马鲁肽组。因此,这项研究扩展了之前发表的 SELECT 的观察结果,SELECT 显示塞马鲁肽对肥胖或超重的心血管疾病患者有益。这项新研究报告称,在肥胖或超重的类似患者群体中,心衰患者在减少主要不良心血管事件、心血管相关死亡或任何原因的死亡率方面的表现与非心衰患者一样好。这一点非常重要,因为另一种胰高血糖素样肽-1 类似物利拉鲁肽在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中的安全性还存在一些不确定性。3 那么,这项研究的证据在我们目前管理 2 型糖尿病患者心力衰竭的策略中处于什么位置呢?值得注意的是,塞马鲁肽并未获得治疗心力衰竭的许可。相反,基于钠葡萄糖协同转运体 2 抑制剂的证据表明,无论疾病状况如何,也无论心衰是否伴有射血分数保留或降低,心衰患者都能明显受益。此外,塞马鲁肽改善心衰患者心血管获益的确切机制仍不清楚。不过,观察到赛马鲁肽降低了所有心衰组的全因死亡率,这表明赛马鲁肽具有改善心衰预后的某些多向效应,包括通过减少肥胖,而肥胖是心衰进展的一个重要风险因素。虽然这项研究支持在常规治疗的基础上使用塞马鲁肽来降低主要不良心血管事件的风险,但首先需要进一步的研究来评估塞马鲁肽对心衰相关结果的影响。这些数据适用于 SGLT2 抑制剂。由于 SELECT 并非一项专门针对心衰的试验,因此研究结果不能推广到一般心衰患者身上。在此之前,SGLT2 抑制剂仍应是 2 型糖尿病合并心衰患者的首选治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信