Using Environmental DNA to Detect and Identify Sweetpotato Whitefly Bemisia argentifolii and Twospotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae in Greenhouse-Grown Tomato Plants

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Jonathan Lee-Rodriguez, Christopher M. Ranger, Ashley Leach, Andrew Michel, Michael E. Reding, Luis Canas
{"title":"Using Environmental DNA to Detect and Identify Sweetpotato Whitefly Bemisia argentifolii and Twospotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae in Greenhouse-Grown Tomato Plants","authors":"Jonathan Lee-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Christopher M. Ranger,&nbsp;Ashley Leach,&nbsp;Andrew Michel,&nbsp;Michael E. Reding,&nbsp;Luis Canas","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) consists of genetic material shed by living organisms, including those that are deceased, offering a unique opportunity to detect and identify terrestrial insect pests without requiring visual identification. The sweetpotato whitefly, <i>Bemisia argentifolii</i>, and the twospotted spider mite, <i>Tetranychus urticae</i>, are notorious for causing crop losses through virus transmission and direct feeding. Our study aimed to: (1) assess the effectiveness of <i>B. argentifolii</i> literature-based PCR primers compared to newly developed primers for eDNA amplification, (2) evaluate the sensitivity of conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting eDNA of <i>B. argentifolii</i> and <i>T. urticae</i>, (3) establish a rapid eDNA processing methodology using the LGC Biosearch Technologies QuickExtract DNA extraction kit and the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit, and (4) test the specificity of the developed primers against non-target species. <i>B. argentifolii</i> and <i>T. urticae</i> were confined to tomato leaves (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>) using clip cages for 24 h, after which eDNA was collected from leaf surfaces using a water spray method, filtered, and processed for DNA amplification. While literature-based primers showed sufficient sensitivity, their specificity for eDNA applications was inadequate, prompting the design of novel PCR primers for both pest species. Positive eDNA detection was achieved with both amplification methods, with qPCR proving more reliable than cPCR due to the latter's inconsistent performance with positive control samples. We also introduced a rapid eDNA processing approach using the QuickExtract DNA extraction kit, contrasting it with the more conventional Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit. We believe that our findings are the first step toward the practical use of eDNA as a highly sensitive, early detection technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) consists of genetic material shed by living organisms, including those that are deceased, offering a unique opportunity to detect and identify terrestrial insect pests without requiring visual identification. The sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii, and the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, are notorious for causing crop losses through virus transmission and direct feeding. Our study aimed to: (1) assess the effectiveness of B. argentifolii literature-based PCR primers compared to newly developed primers for eDNA amplification, (2) evaluate the sensitivity of conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting eDNA of B. argentifolii and T. urticae, (3) establish a rapid eDNA processing methodology using the LGC Biosearch Technologies QuickExtract DNA extraction kit and the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit, and (4) test the specificity of the developed primers against non-target species. B. argentifolii and T. urticae were confined to tomato leaves (Solanum lycopersicum) using clip cages for 24 h, after which eDNA was collected from leaf surfaces using a water spray method, filtered, and processed for DNA amplification. While literature-based primers showed sufficient sensitivity, their specificity for eDNA applications was inadequate, prompting the design of novel PCR primers for both pest species. Positive eDNA detection was achieved with both amplification methods, with qPCR proving more reliable than cPCR due to the latter's inconsistent performance with positive control samples. We also introduced a rapid eDNA processing approach using the QuickExtract DNA extraction kit, contrasting it with the more conventional Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit. We believe that our findings are the first step toward the practical use of eDNA as a highly sensitive, early detection technique.

Abstract Image

利用环境 DNA 检测和识别温室番茄植株中的甘薯粉虱 Bemisia argentifolii 和双斑蛛螨 Tetranychus urticae
环境 DNA(eDNA)由生物体(包括已死亡的生物体)脱落的遗传物质组成,为检测和识别陆生害虫提供了一个独特的机会,而无需肉眼识别。甘薯粉虱(Bemisia argentifolii)和双斑蜘蛛螨(Tetranychus urticae)因传播病毒和直接取食造成作物损失而臭名昭著。我们的研究旨在(1) 与新开发的引物相比,评估基于文献的 B. argentifolii PCR 引物对 eDNA 扩增的有效性;(2) 评估传统 PCR(cPCR)和实时定量 PCR(qPCR)检测 B. argentifolii 和 T. argentifolii eDNA 的灵敏度。 (3) 使用 LGC Biosearch Technologies QuickExtract DNA 提取试剂盒和 Qiagen DNeasy 血液与组织试剂盒建立快速 eDNA 处理方法,以及 (4) 测试开发的引物对非目标物种的特异性。使用夹子笼将 B. argentifolii 和 T. urticae 限制在番茄叶片(Solanum lycopersicum)上 24 小时,然后用水喷雾法从叶片表面收集 eDNA,过滤后进行 DNA 扩增处理。虽然基于文献的引物显示出足够的灵敏度,但它们对 eDNA 应用的特异性不足,这促使我们设计出针对这两种害虫的新型 PCR 引物。两种扩增方法都能检测到阳性 eDNA,qPCR 比 cPCR 更可靠,因为后者在阳性对照样本中的表现不一致。我们还介绍了使用 QuickExtract DNA 提取试剂盒快速处理 eDNA 的方法,并将其与更传统的 Qiagen DNeasy 血液和组织试剂盒进行了对比。我们相信,我们的研究结果是将 eDNA 作为一种高灵敏度早期检测技术投入实际应用的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信