Clinical inertia in onychomycosis treatment: results from the Illuminating Dialogues and Insights in Onychomycosis Management (IDIOM) survey.

Yuichiro Tsunemi, Atsushi Otsuka, Yusuke Nonaka
{"title":"Clinical inertia in onychomycosis treatment: results from the Illuminating Dialogues and Insights in Onychomycosis Management (IDIOM) survey.","authors":"Yuichiro Tsunemi, Atsushi Otsuka, Yusuke Nonaka","doi":"10.1111/1346-8138.17495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail that can serve as a reservoir for tinea infections in other parts of the body and can be transmitted to other individuals. As the disease progresses, it can lead to functional impairment, such as difficulties in walking, and negatively impact the psychosocial aspects of quality of life. Onychomycosis treatment, especially topical, is long-term, and adequate follow-up is essential for cure. However, the realities and issues of patient-physician communication after treatment initiation, including patients' perception of efficacy, treatment satisfaction, and reconsideration of the treatment approach, remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the realities and issues associated with onychomycosis treatment, focusing on topical therapies, through a web-based survey of patients with onychomycosis and dermatologists. The duration of topical treatment was prolonged, with 30.5% of patients undergoing topical therapy for more than 2 years. Of these, 54.5% had not perceived clear efficacy. In addition, 93.7% of all patients with onychomycosis expressed a desire to change their treatment if it was ineffective. However, only 29.9% of patients receiving topical treatment discussed changing their treatment with their physicians, and only 7.3% ultimately changed their treatment. These findings indicate that the review of treatment strategies was insufficient. Furthermore, the satisfaction rate among patients treated with oral medications was higher than that of patients treated with topical medication. Despite dermatologists' awareness of low patient satisfaction with topical treatments, approximately 40% recommended alternative topical therapies when the initial topical treatment was ineffective. These results suggest clinical inertia in the treatment of onychomycosis stemming from a lack of appropriate intensification of treatment. In managing onychomycosis, the patient and dermatologist must share a common understanding of the importance of regular evaluation and the optimization of treatment regimens during treatment and must work side by side toward a cure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94236,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.17495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail that can serve as a reservoir for tinea infections in other parts of the body and can be transmitted to other individuals. As the disease progresses, it can lead to functional impairment, such as difficulties in walking, and negatively impact the psychosocial aspects of quality of life. Onychomycosis treatment, especially topical, is long-term, and adequate follow-up is essential for cure. However, the realities and issues of patient-physician communication after treatment initiation, including patients' perception of efficacy, treatment satisfaction, and reconsideration of the treatment approach, remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the realities and issues associated with onychomycosis treatment, focusing on topical therapies, through a web-based survey of patients with onychomycosis and dermatologists. The duration of topical treatment was prolonged, with 30.5% of patients undergoing topical therapy for more than 2 years. Of these, 54.5% had not perceived clear efficacy. In addition, 93.7% of all patients with onychomycosis expressed a desire to change their treatment if it was ineffective. However, only 29.9% of patients receiving topical treatment discussed changing their treatment with their physicians, and only 7.3% ultimately changed their treatment. These findings indicate that the review of treatment strategies was insufficient. Furthermore, the satisfaction rate among patients treated with oral medications was higher than that of patients treated with topical medication. Despite dermatologists' awareness of low patient satisfaction with topical treatments, approximately 40% recommended alternative topical therapies when the initial topical treatment was ineffective. These results suggest clinical inertia in the treatment of onychomycosis stemming from a lack of appropriate intensification of treatment. In managing onychomycosis, the patient and dermatologist must share a common understanding of the importance of regular evaluation and the optimization of treatment regimens during treatment and must work side by side toward a cure.

甲癣治疗中的临床惰性:甲癣管理中的启发性对话和见解(IDIOM)调查的结果。
甲癣是一种指甲真菌感染,可作为身体其他部位癣菌感染的贮藏库,并可传染给其他人。随着病情的发展,它会导致功能障碍,如行走困难,并对生活质量的社会心理方面产生负面影响。股癣的治疗,尤其是局部治疗,是长期性的,充分的随访对治愈至关重要。然而,治疗开始后医患沟通的现实情况和问题,包括患者对疗效的感知、治疗满意度和对治疗方法的重新考虑,仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在通过一项针对甲癣患者和皮肤科医生的网络调查,研究与甲癣治疗相关的现实情况和问题,重点关注局部疗法。局部治疗的持续时间较长,30.5%的患者接受局部治疗的时间超过 2 年。其中,54.5%的患者认为疗效不明显。此外,在所有甲癣患者中,93.7%的患者表示如果治疗无效,希望更换治疗方法。然而,在接受局部治疗的患者中,只有 29.9% 的患者与医生讨论过改变治疗方法的问题,最终只有 7.3% 的患者改变了治疗方法。这些结果表明,对治疗策略的审查还不够充分。此外,接受口服药物治疗的患者的满意度高于接受局部药物治疗的患者。尽管皮肤科医生意识到患者对局部治疗的满意度较低,但仍有约 40% 的医生在最初的局部治疗无效时推荐了其他局部疗法。这些结果表明,由于缺乏适当的强化治疗,临床上对股癣的治疗存在惰性。在治疗甲癣的过程中,患者和皮肤科医生必须对治疗期间定期评估和优化治疗方案的重要性有共同的认识,并且必须并肩努力,争取治愈甲癣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信