Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Adaptations to Systematically Varying Resistance Exercises.

Witalo Kassiano, Bruna Costa, Gabriel Kunevaliki, João Pedro Nunes, Pâmela Castro-E-Souza, Jainara de Paula Felipe, Ian Tricoli, Alan Luiz, Valmor Tricoli, Edilson S Cyrino
{"title":"Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Adaptations to Systematically Varying Resistance Exercises.","authors":"Witalo Kassiano, Bruna Costa, Gabriel Kunevaliki, João Pedro Nunes, Pâmela Castro-E-Souza, Jainara de Paula Felipe, Ian Tricoli, Alan Luiz, Valmor Tricoli, Edilson S Cyrino","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2024.2409961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the effects of varied and constant resistance exercises on muscular adaptations in young women. Seventy young women (21.8 ± 3.4 yrs, 62.0 ± 12.3 kg, 162.3 ± 5.7 cm) were randomly divided into two groups: constant resistance exercises (CON-RE, <i>n</i> = 38) or varied resistance exercises (VAR-RE, <i>n</i> = 32). The resistance training (RT) was performed thrice a week over 10 weeks. CON-RE performed a 45º leg press and stiff-leg deadlift in every training session, while VAR-RE performed 45º leg press and stiff-leg deadlift in the first training session of the week, hack squat and prone leg curl in the second, and Smith machine squat and seated-leg curl in the third. Both groups performed two sets of 10-15 repetitions maximum per resistance exercise. We measured the muscle thickness of the thigh's anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects by ultrasonography at different muscle sites (proximo-distal). Muscular strength was analyzed from the one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests in the 45° leg press and leg extension (non-trained exercise). The muscle thickness increased similarly in both groups for all muscles and sites (CON-RE: +7.8-17.7% vs. VAR-RE: +7.5-19.3%, <i>p</i> > .05). The 1RM increased similarly in both groups (CON-RE: +24.4-32.1% vs. VAR-RE: +29.0-30.1%, <i>p</i> > .05). Both RT routines resulted in virtually similar muscular strength gains and hypertrophy. Therefore, both strategies should be considered for the improvement of strength and muscle growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2409961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the effects of varied and constant resistance exercises on muscular adaptations in young women. Seventy young women (21.8 ± 3.4 yrs, 62.0 ± 12.3 kg, 162.3 ± 5.7 cm) were randomly divided into two groups: constant resistance exercises (CON-RE, n = 38) or varied resistance exercises (VAR-RE, n = 32). The resistance training (RT) was performed thrice a week over 10 weeks. CON-RE performed a 45º leg press and stiff-leg deadlift in every training session, while VAR-RE performed 45º leg press and stiff-leg deadlift in the first training session of the week, hack squat and prone leg curl in the second, and Smith machine squat and seated-leg curl in the third. Both groups performed two sets of 10-15 repetitions maximum per resistance exercise. We measured the muscle thickness of the thigh's anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects by ultrasonography at different muscle sites (proximo-distal). Muscular strength was analyzed from the one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests in the 45° leg press and leg extension (non-trained exercise). The muscle thickness increased similarly in both groups for all muscles and sites (CON-RE: +7.8-17.7% vs. VAR-RE: +7.5-19.3%, p > .05). The 1RM increased similarly in both groups (CON-RE: +24.4-32.1% vs. VAR-RE: +29.0-30.1%, p > .05). Both RT routines resulted in virtually similar muscular strength gains and hypertrophy. Therefore, both strategies should be considered for the improvement of strength and muscle growth.

肌肉肥大和力量对系统变化阻力运动的适应。
我们比较了不同阻力练习和恒定阻力练习对年轻女性肌肉适应性的影响。我们将 70 名年轻女性(21.8 ± 3.4 岁,62.0 ± 12.3 千克,162.3 ± 5.7 厘米)随机分为两组:恒定阻力训练组(CON-RE,38 人)或变化阻力训练组(VAR-RE,32 人)。阻力训练(RT)每周进行三次,持续 10 周。CON-RE组在每次训练中都进行45º压腿和硬腿举重训练,而VAR-RE组在一周的第一次训练中进行45º压腿和硬腿举重训练,在第二次训练中进行hack深蹲和俯卧腿卷曲训练,在第三次训练中进行史密斯机深蹲和坐姿腿卷曲训练。每组阻力训练均进行两组,每组最多重复 10-15 次。我们在不同的肌肉部位(近端-远端)通过超声波测量了大腿前侧、外侧和后侧的肌肉厚度。肌肉力量是通过 45°压腿和伸腿(非训练)的单次最大重量(1RM)测试进行分析的。两组所有肌肉和部位的肌肉厚度增长相似(CON-RE:+7.8-17.7% vs. VAR-RE:+7.5-19.3%,P > .05)。两组的 1RM 增幅相似(CON-RE:+24.4-32.1% vs. VAR-RE:+29.0-30.1%,P > .05)。两种实时训练方法所带来的肌肉力量增长和肥大几乎相似。因此,在提高力量和肌肉增长方面,两种策略都应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信