Experiences of clinical nurses with medication interruption: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Qing Wang, Xiaotong Ding, Mingyue Zhu, Hongli Chen, Yanli Yang, Yanhong Wang, Zixuan Gan, Yuetfoon Chung, Zheng Li
{"title":"Experiences of clinical nurses with medication interruption: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.","authors":"Qing Wang, Xiaotong Ding, Mingyue Zhu, Hongli Chen, Yanli Yang, Yanhong Wang, Zixuan Gan, Yuetfoon Chung, Zheng Li","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Managing medication interruptions is considered one of the biggest dilemmas for nurses in clinical settings. To improve medication safety, it was imperative to conduct a systematic review to get a deeper understanding of nurses' experiences with medication interruptions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis aimed to explore clinical nurses' experiences of interruption during medication in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2024. The search strategy included four groups of keywords: (1) qualitative research, (2) nurses, (3) medication interruption, and (4) experience. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta-ethnography was utilized to synthesize the findings of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles published between 2012 and 2023 were included; the number of participants varied from 5 to 40, aged 20-68 years, and the majority were female. Four synthesized findings were identified as follows: (1) an inevitable part of the routine, (2) a decision-making process, (3) working in a minefield, and (4) coping with interruption.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Nurses embraced interruptions as an inherent component of clinical care. Previous experience and nursing culture, encompassing personal and professional aspects, significantly influence nurses' attitudes toward medication interruptions. It is crucial to incorporate the distinctive work experiences of nurses into techniques aimed at efficiently handling interruptions in future research. The registration number in PROSPERO is CRD42023470276.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Managing medication interruptions is considered one of the biggest dilemmas for nurses in clinical settings. To improve medication safety, it was imperative to conduct a systematic review to get a deeper understanding of nurses' experiences with medication interruptions.

Aims: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis aimed to explore clinical nurses' experiences of interruption during medication in hospitals.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2024. The search strategy included four groups of keywords: (1) qualitative research, (2) nurses, (3) medication interruption, and (4) experience. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta-ethnography was utilized to synthesize the findings of the included studies.

Results: Nine articles published between 2012 and 2023 were included; the number of participants varied from 5 to 40, aged 20-68 years, and the majority were female. Four synthesized findings were identified as follows: (1) an inevitable part of the routine, (2) a decision-making process, (3) working in a minefield, and (4) coping with interruption.

Linking evidence to action: Nurses embraced interruptions as an inherent component of clinical care. Previous experience and nursing culture, encompassing personal and professional aspects, significantly influence nurses' attitudes toward medication interruptions. It is crucial to incorporate the distinctive work experiences of nurses into techniques aimed at efficiently handling interruptions in future research. The registration number in PROSPERO is CRD42023470276.

临床护士在中断用药方面的经验:系统回顾与定性元综合。
背景:管理用药中断被认为是临床环境中护士面临的最大难题之一。为了提高用药安全,当务之急是进行系统性综述,以深入了解护士在用药中断方面的经验。目的:通过系统性综述和定性荟萃,旨在探讨临床护士在医院用药中断方面的经验:从开始到 2024 年 1 月,在 PubMed、CINAHL、Ovid Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统检索。检索策略包括四组关键词:(1) 定性研究;(2) 护士;(3) 用药中断;(4) 经验。批判性评价技能计划用于评估研究质量。采用元人类学方法对纳入研究的结果进行综合:共纳入了 9 篇发表于 2012 年至 2023 年的文章;参与者人数从 5 人到 40 人不等,年龄在 20-68 岁之间,大多数为女性。综合研究结果发现以下四点:(将证据与行动联系起来:护士将中断视为临床护理的固有组成部分。以往的经验和护理文化(包括个人和专业方面)对护士对待用药中断的态度有很大影响。在未来的研究中,将护士独特的工作经验纳入旨在有效处理中断的技术中至关重要。PROSPERO 注册号为 CRD42023470276。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信