Role of Heart Rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, and Respiratory Rate Score in Predicting Outcomes of Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients.

Q3 Medicine
Raghuveer Singh, Bidyalakshmee Devi Yumnam, Govind Singh Rajawat, Ambika Sharma
{"title":"Role of Heart Rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, and Respiratory Rate Score in Predicting Outcomes of Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients.","authors":"Raghuveer Singh, Bidyalakshmee Devi Yumnam, Govind Singh Rajawat, Ambika Sharma","doi":"10.59556/japi.72.0666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), early detection of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure is a promising technique for decreasing mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, and respiratory rate (HACOR) score in predicting NIV outcome in COPD-associated respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on 100 COPD patients with acute respiratory failure who were initiated on NIV. HACOR score was calculated at the start of NIV and after 1-2, 12, and 24 hours. NIV failure was defined as progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or death. NIV success was defined as liberation from NIV prior to hospital day seven and not meeting criteria for failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 100 patients with COPD and respiratory failure were enrolled. Their mean age was 65.34 years [standard deviation (SD) 8.19]. Male patients were predominant (<i>n</i> = 81). Eighty-nine percent of patients were smokers, and the remaining had exposure to biomass fuel. At the initiation of NIV, the median HACOR score was 3 (interquartile: 2, 4). In 13% of patients, there was NIV failure. There were 17 (17%) patients whose HACOR score at initiation was ≥5. In patients with a HACOR score ≥5, the NIV failure rate was 76.4% and mortality was 41.1%. The area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of NIV failure by HACOR score at initiation was 0.980 (<i>p</i>-value < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HACOR score had high sensitivity as well as specificity at initiation in the prediction of NIV failure. A higher HACOR score predicts a high chance of NIV failure. Obtaining the HACOR score at the bedside makes it convenient for assessing the efficacy of NIV in patients with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"72 10","pages":"50-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), early detection of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure is a promising technique for decreasing mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, and respiratory rate (HACOR) score in predicting NIV outcome in COPD-associated respiratory failure.

Methodology: A prospective observational study was conducted on 100 COPD patients with acute respiratory failure who were initiated on NIV. HACOR score was calculated at the start of NIV and after 1-2, 12, and 24 hours. NIV failure was defined as progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or death. NIV success was defined as liberation from NIV prior to hospital day seven and not meeting criteria for failure.

Results: In this study, 100 patients with COPD and respiratory failure were enrolled. Their mean age was 65.34 years [standard deviation (SD) 8.19]. Male patients were predominant (n = 81). Eighty-nine percent of patients were smokers, and the remaining had exposure to biomass fuel. At the initiation of NIV, the median HACOR score was 3 (interquartile: 2, 4). In 13% of patients, there was NIV failure. There were 17 (17%) patients whose HACOR score at initiation was ≥5. In patients with a HACOR score ≥5, the NIV failure rate was 76.4% and mortality was 41.1%. The area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of NIV failure by HACOR score at initiation was 0.980 (p-value < 0.05).

Conclusion: The HACOR score had high sensitivity as well as specificity at initiation in the prediction of NIV failure. A higher HACOR score predicts a high chance of NIV failure. Obtaining the HACOR score at the bedside makes it convenient for assessing the efficacy of NIV in patients with COPD.

心率、酸中毒、意识、氧合作用和呼吸频率评分在预测慢性阻塞性肺病患者无创通气疗效中的作用
背景:在慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者中,早期发现无创通气(NIV)失败是降低死亡率的一项有前途的技术。本研究旨在评估心率、酸中毒、意识、氧饱和度和呼吸频率(HACOR)评分在预测 COPD 相关呼吸衰竭患者无创通气结果方面的效果:对 100 名急性呼吸衰竭的 COPD 患者进行了前瞻性观察研究,这些患者开始使用 NIV。在开始使用 NIV 时以及 1-2、12 和 24 小时后计算 HACOR 分数。NIV 失败的定义是进展为侵入性机械通气或死亡。NIV 成功的定义是在住院第七天之前脱离 NIV,且未达到失败标准:本研究共招募了 100 名患有慢性阻塞性肺病和呼吸衰竭的患者。他们的平均年龄为 65.34 岁[标准差(SD)为 8.19]。男性患者居多(81 人)。89% 的患者为吸烟者,其余患者接触过生物质燃料。开始使用 NIV 时,HACOR 评分的中位数为 3(四分位间:2,4)。13%的患者出现了 NIV 失败。有 17 名(17%)患者在开始使用呼吸机时的 HACOR 评分≥5 分。在 HACOR 评分≥5 的患者中,NIV 失败率为 76.4%,死亡率为 41.1%。通过开始时的HACOR评分预测NIV失败的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.980(P值<0.05):结论:HACOR 评分在开始预测 NIV 失败时具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。HACOR 评分越高,预测 NIV 失败的几率越高。在床边获得 HACOR 评分便于评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者的 NIV 疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信