Effect of low-dose norepinephrine combined with goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in lung surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Yang Gao MD , Dong Ji MD , Qi Fang MD , Yamei Li MD, Keyan Wang MD, Jia Liu MD, Lei Wang MD, Erwei Gu MD, Lei Zhang MD, PhD, Lijian Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Effect of low-dose norepinephrine combined with goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative pulmonary complications in lung surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yang Gao MD , Dong Ji MD , Qi Fang MD , Yamei Li MD, Keyan Wang MD, Jia Liu MD, Lei Wang MD, Erwei Gu MD, Lei Zhang MD, PhD, Lijian Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), the predominant complications following lung surgery, are closely associated with intraoperative fluid therapy. This study investigates whether continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduced the risk of PPCs after lung surgery relative to either GDFT alone or standard fluid treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A prospective, randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>The study included 184 patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic lung resection surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patients were randomized into three groups based on different fluid treatment regimens: Group C received standard fluid treatment, Group G received GDFT, and Group N received continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with GDFT.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs, including respiratory infection, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural empyema, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism and bronchopleural fistula, during the postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic variables and arterial blood gases. Additional recorded parameters included other postoperative complications such as bleeding, postoperative re-intubation, re-hospitalization within 30 days, and the length of hospital stay.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>Group N showed a significantly lower PPCs incidence during hospitalization compared to Group C (11.5 % vs 27.9 %; odds ratio, 2.98; 95 % confidence interval, 1.17–8.31; <em>P</em> = 0.023). No significant difference in PPCs was found between Group N and Group G (11.5 % vs 14.5 %; odds ratio, 1.31; 95 % confidence interval, 0.46–3.91; <em>P</em> = 0.616). Additionally, there were no significant differences among the three groups in the components of PPCs. Group N showed higher mean arterial pressure and stroke volume index intraoperatively compared to Group C.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with GDFT reduced PPCs incidence in elective lung surgery patients compared with standard fluid management, but showed no difference compared to GDFT alone.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>ChiCTR2200064081.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111645"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), the predominant complications following lung surgery, are closely associated with intraoperative fluid therapy. This study investigates whether continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduced the risk of PPCs after lung surgery relative to either GDFT alone or standard fluid treatment.
Design
A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Setting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China.
Patients
The study included 184 patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic lung resection surgery.
Interventions
Patients were randomized into three groups based on different fluid treatment regimens: Group C received standard fluid treatment, Group G received GDFT, and Group N received continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with GDFT.
Measurements
The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs, including respiratory infection, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural empyema, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism and bronchopleural fistula, during the postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic variables and arterial blood gases. Additional recorded parameters included other postoperative complications such as bleeding, postoperative re-intubation, re-hospitalization within 30 days, and the length of hospital stay.
Main results
Group N showed a significantly lower PPCs incidence during hospitalization compared to Group C (11.5 % vs 27.9 %; odds ratio, 2.98; 95 % confidence interval, 1.17–8.31; P = 0.023). No significant difference in PPCs was found between Group N and Group G (11.5 % vs 14.5 %; odds ratio, 1.31; 95 % confidence interval, 0.46–3.91; P = 0.616). Additionally, there were no significant differences among the three groups in the components of PPCs. Group N showed higher mean arterial pressure and stroke volume index intraoperatively compared to Group C.
Conclusions
Continuous low-dose norepinephrine infusion combined with GDFT reduced PPCs incidence in elective lung surgery patients compared with standard fluid management, but showed no difference compared to GDFT alone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.