Pharmacokinetic data of lopinavir/ritonavir in second-line treatment of African children living with HIV

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic data of lopinavir/ritonavir in second-line treatment of African children living with HIV","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>15</b></p><p><b>Pharmacokinetic data of lopinavir/ritonavir in second-line treatment of African children living with HIV</b></p><p>Anne Kamphuis<sup>1</sup>, Hylke Waalewijn<sup>1,2</sup>, Alexander Szucbert<sup>3</sup>, Chishala Chabala<sup>4</sup>, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi<sup>5</sup>, Shafic Makumbi<sup>6</sup>, Joan Nangiya<sup>6</sup>, Vivian Mumbiro<sup>5</sup>, Veronica Mulenga<sup>4</sup>, Victor Mussiime<sup>6</sup>, David Burger<sup>1</sup>, Diana Gibb<sup>3</sup> and Angela Colbers<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Radboud Research Institute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboudumc;</i> <sup>2</sup><i>Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town;</i> <sup>3</sup><i>Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London;</i> <sup>4</sup><i>University Teaching Hospital;</i> <sup>5</sup><i>University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre;</i> <sup>6</sup><i>Joint Clinical Research Centre</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> Children living with HIV require specific strengths and formulations of antiretrovirals. Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is recommended by the WHO for children as preferred bPI for second-line. As paediatric 100/25 mg tablets have inconsistent availability in some countries, using adult 200/50 mg tablets for children could simplify procurement. For children weighing 25–34.9 kg, the daily recommended dose of 600/150 mg could be achieved by dosing two 200/50 mg tablets in the morning and one in the evening, instead of three 100/25 mg tablets twice daily (current WHO-recommendation). In CHAPAS-4 (#ISRCTN22964075), second-line treatment options for children with HIV were investigated. We performed a nested PK substudy to evaluate LPV/r exposure in children with different NRTI backbones.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Children with HIV aged 3–15 years failing NNRTI-based first-line treatment were randomized to four anchor drugs with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or standard-of-care NRTIs (abacavir or zidovudine with lamivudine). Children weighing 14–24.9 kg received 200/50 mg LPV/r twice daily; children weighing 25–34.9 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r in the morning and 200/50 mg in the evening; and children weighing ≥35 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r twice daily. At steady state, PK blood samples were taken at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after LPV/r intake with food. LPV concentrations were measured using a validated HPLC method. Lopinavir AUC<sub>0–12 h</sub>, C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>trough</sub> were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. PK data of children receiving similar dosages were used for comparison. The individual target C<sub>trough</sub> was defined as 1.0 mg/L. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA on log-transformed values with Tukey post hoc analysis to detect differences in LPV PK parameters between weight bands and NRTI backbones.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-one children were included in this substudy. Eleven children were excluded for varied reasons. There were nine children in the 14–19.9 kg weight band, 10 in 20–24.9 kg, 9 in 25–34.9 kg and 12 in ≥35 kg. The overall geometric mean (GM), (CV%) AUC<sub>0-12 h</sub> was 116.15 h*mg/L (37%) and the GM (CV%) C<sub>max</sub> was 12.52 mg/L (32%), which is comparable to the reference AUC<sub>0–12 h</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>. The GM (CV%) C<sub>trough</sub> of 7.71 mg/L (52%) in this sub-study is ∼57% higher than the reference value, and near to the C<sub>trough</sub> associated with dyslipidaemia in adults (8 mg/L), possibly explaining why CHAPAS-4 children on LPV/r showed the least favourable lipid profiles. The C<sub>trough</sub> and the C<sub>max</sub> were significantly higher in children weighing 25–34.9 kg (11.7 and 15.38 mg/L) compared to children in the 14–19.9 kg and ≥35 kg weight-bands (6.19 and 12.52 mg/L; 6.96 and 12.10 mg/L, respectively); <i>p</i>-values ranging from 0.021 to 0.048. These children received a higher milligram per kilogram body weight dose in the morning compared to children in the other weight bands. There was no difference in PK parameters when comparing according to backbone.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This PK sub-study shows that the AUC<sub>0–12 h</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> of LPV after administration of LPV/r with food in children 3–15 years of age weighing ≥14 kg on second-line treatment is comparable to reference data of children. In addition, it shows that the use of the adult LPV/r 200/50 mg tablet could potentially be extended from the currently WHO-recommended 35 kg down to 25 kg. Relatively high C<sub>trough</sub> concentrations may be associated with dyslipidaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 S1","pages":"12-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16294","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

15

Pharmacokinetic data of lopinavir/ritonavir in second-line treatment of African children living with HIV

Anne Kamphuis1, Hylke Waalewijn1,2, Alexander Szucbert3, Chishala Chabala4, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi5, Shafic Makumbi6, Joan Nangiya6, Vivian Mumbiro5, Veronica Mulenga4, Victor Mussiime6, David Burger1, Diana Gibb3 and Angela Colbers1

1Radboud Research Institute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboudumc; 2Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town; 3Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London; 4University Teaching Hospital; 5University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre; 6Joint Clinical Research Centre

Background: Children living with HIV require specific strengths and formulations of antiretrovirals. Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is recommended by the WHO for children as preferred bPI for second-line. As paediatric 100/25 mg tablets have inconsistent availability in some countries, using adult 200/50 mg tablets for children could simplify procurement. For children weighing 25–34.9 kg, the daily recommended dose of 600/150 mg could be achieved by dosing two 200/50 mg tablets in the morning and one in the evening, instead of three 100/25 mg tablets twice daily (current WHO-recommendation). In CHAPAS-4 (#ISRCTN22964075), second-line treatment options for children with HIV were investigated. We performed a nested PK substudy to evaluate LPV/r exposure in children with different NRTI backbones.

Methods: Children with HIV aged 3–15 years failing NNRTI-based first-line treatment were randomized to four anchor drugs with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or standard-of-care NRTIs (abacavir or zidovudine with lamivudine). Children weighing 14–24.9 kg received 200/50 mg LPV/r twice daily; children weighing 25–34.9 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r in the morning and 200/50 mg in the evening; and children weighing ≥35 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r twice daily. At steady state, PK blood samples were taken at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after LPV/r intake with food. LPV concentrations were measured using a validated HPLC method. Lopinavir AUC0–12 h, Cmax and Ctrough were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. PK data of children receiving similar dosages were used for comparison. The individual target Ctrough was defined as 1.0 mg/L. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA on log-transformed values with Tukey post hoc analysis to detect differences in LPV PK parameters between weight bands and NRTI backbones.

Results: Fifty-one children were included in this substudy. Eleven children were excluded for varied reasons. There were nine children in the 14–19.9 kg weight band, 10 in 20–24.9 kg, 9 in 25–34.9 kg and 12 in ≥35 kg. The overall geometric mean (GM), (CV%) AUC0-12 h was 116.15 h*mg/L (37%) and the GM (CV%) Cmax was 12.52 mg/L (32%), which is comparable to the reference AUC0–12 h and Cmax. The GM (CV%) Ctrough of 7.71 mg/L (52%) in this sub-study is ∼57% higher than the reference value, and near to the Ctrough associated with dyslipidaemia in adults (8 mg/L), possibly explaining why CHAPAS-4 children on LPV/r showed the least favourable lipid profiles. The Ctrough and the Cmax were significantly higher in children weighing 25–34.9 kg (11.7 and 15.38 mg/L) compared to children in the 14–19.9 kg and ≥35 kg weight-bands (6.19 and 12.52 mg/L; 6.96 and 12.10 mg/L, respectively); p-values ranging from 0.021 to 0.048. These children received a higher milligram per kilogram body weight dose in the morning compared to children in the other weight bands. There was no difference in PK parameters when comparing according to backbone.

Conclusions: This PK sub-study shows that the AUC0–12 h and Cmax of LPV after administration of LPV/r with food in children 3–15 years of age weighing ≥14 kg on second-line treatment is comparable to reference data of children. In addition, it shows that the use of the adult LPV/r 200/50 mg tablet could potentially be extended from the currently WHO-recommended 35 kg down to 25 kg. Relatively high Ctrough concentrations may be associated with dyslipidaemia.

艾滋病、肝炎和其他抗病毒药物临床药理学国际研讨会摘要。
15洛匹那韦/利托那韦在非洲儿童艾滋病感染者二线治疗中的药代动力学数据Anne Kamphuis1, Hylke Waalewijn1,2, Alexander Szucbert3, Chishala Chabala4, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi5、Shafic Makumbi6, Joan Nangiya6, Vivian Mumbiro5, Veronica Mulenga4, Victor Mussiime6, David Burger1, Diana Gibb3 and Angela Colbers11Radboud Research Institute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboudumc;2 开普敦大学医学系临床药理学部;3 伦敦大学学院医学研究理事会临床试验组;4 大学教学医院;5 津巴布韦大学临床研究中心;6 联合临床研究中心背景:背景:感染艾滋病毒的儿童需要特定强度和配方的抗逆转录病毒药物。洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)是世界卫生组织推荐的儿童二线首选 bPI。由于一些国家 100/25 毫克的儿科药片供应不稳定,使用 200/50 毫克的成人药片可简化儿童用药的采购。对于体重在 25-34.9 公斤的儿童,每天早晚各服用两片 200/50 毫克药片,而不是每天两次服用三片 100/25 毫克药片(目前的世卫组织建议),即可达到 600/150 毫克的推荐剂量。在 CHAPAS-4(#ISRCTN22964075)中,我们研究了艾滋病儿童的二线治疗方案。我们进行了一项巢式 PK 子研究,以评估 LPV/r 在不同 NRTI 骨架儿童中的暴露情况:方法:对NNRTI一线治疗失败的3-15岁艾滋病病毒感染儿童进行了随机分组,将其分为四种锚定药物与恩曲他滨/替诺福韦-阿拉非酰胺或标准护理NRTI(阿巴卡韦或齐多夫定与拉米夫定)。体重为14-24.9公斤的儿童每天两次服用200/50毫克LPV/r;体重为25-34.9公斤的儿童早上服用400/100毫克LPV/r,晚上服用200/50毫克;体重≥35公斤的儿童每天两次服用400/100毫克LPV/r。在稳态时,分别在服药前、服药后1、2、4、6、8和12小时采集PK血样。LPV 浓度采用经过验证的 HPLC 方法进行测量。洛匹那韦 AUC0-12 h、Cmax 和 Ctrough 均采用非室分析法计算。比较采用类似剂量的儿童的 PK 数据。个人目标 Ctrough 定义为 1.0 mg/L。采用对数变换值的方差分析和Tukey事后分析法进行统计分析,以检测体重带和NRTI骨架之间LPV PK参数的差异:结果:51名儿童被纳入该次级研究。有 11 名儿童因各种原因被排除在外。体重在14-19.9公斤的儿童有9名,20-24.9公斤的有10名,25-34.9公斤的有9名,≥35公斤的有12名。总体几何平均(GM)、(CV%)AUC0-12 h 为 116.15 h*mg/L (37%),GM(CV%)Cmax 为 12.52 mg/L (32%),与参考 AUC0-12 h 和 Cmax 相当。本子研究中的 GM (CV%) Ctrough 为 7.71 mg/L (52%),比参考值高出 57%,接近与成人血脂异常相关的 Ctrough (8mg/L),这可能是服用 LPV/r 的 CHAPAS-4 儿童血脂状况最差的原因。与体重在14-19.9公斤和≥35公斤的儿童相比,体重在25-34.9公斤的儿童的Ctrough和Cmax(分别为11.7和15.38毫克/升)明显更高(分别为6.19和12.52毫克/升;6.96和12.10毫克/升);P值在0.021至0.048之间。与其他体重段的儿童相比,这些儿童在上午接受的每公斤体重毫克剂量更高。根据骨干进行比较,PK参数没有差异:这项PK子研究表明,在接受二线治疗的3-15岁体重≥14公斤的儿童中,与食物一起服用LPV/r后,LPV的AUC0-12 h和Cmax与儿童的参考数据相当。此外,它还表明,成人 LPV/r 200/50 毫克片剂的使用范围有可能从目前世卫组织推荐的 35 公斤降至 25 公斤。相对较高的 Ctrough 浓度可能与血脂异常有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信