{"title":"Pharmacokinetic data of lopinavir/ritonavir in second-line treatment of African children living with HIV","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>15</b></p><p><b>Pharmacokinetic data of lopinavir/ritonavir in second-line treatment of African children living with HIV</b></p><p>Anne Kamphuis<sup>1</sup>, Hylke Waalewijn<sup>1,2</sup>, Alexander Szucbert<sup>3</sup>, Chishala Chabala<sup>4</sup>, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi<sup>5</sup>, Shafic Makumbi<sup>6</sup>, Joan Nangiya<sup>6</sup>, Vivian Mumbiro<sup>5</sup>, Veronica Mulenga<sup>4</sup>, Victor Mussiime<sup>6</sup>, David Burger<sup>1</sup>, Diana Gibb<sup>3</sup> and Angela Colbers<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Radboud Research Institute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboudumc;</i> <sup>2</sup><i>Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town;</i> <sup>3</sup><i>Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London;</i> <sup>4</sup><i>University Teaching Hospital;</i> <sup>5</sup><i>University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre;</i> <sup>6</sup><i>Joint Clinical Research Centre</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> Children living with HIV require specific strengths and formulations of antiretrovirals. Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is recommended by the WHO for children as preferred bPI for second-line. As paediatric 100/25 mg tablets have inconsistent availability in some countries, using adult 200/50 mg tablets for children could simplify procurement. For children weighing 25–34.9 kg, the daily recommended dose of 600/150 mg could be achieved by dosing two 200/50 mg tablets in the morning and one in the evening, instead of three 100/25 mg tablets twice daily (current WHO-recommendation). In CHAPAS-4 (#ISRCTN22964075), second-line treatment options for children with HIV were investigated. We performed a nested PK substudy to evaluate LPV/r exposure in children with different NRTI backbones.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Children with HIV aged 3–15 years failing NNRTI-based first-line treatment were randomized to four anchor drugs with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or standard-of-care NRTIs (abacavir or zidovudine with lamivudine). Children weighing 14–24.9 kg received 200/50 mg LPV/r twice daily; children weighing 25–34.9 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r in the morning and 200/50 mg in the evening; and children weighing ≥35 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r twice daily. At steady state, PK blood samples were taken at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after LPV/r intake with food. LPV concentrations were measured using a validated HPLC method. Lopinavir AUC<sub>0–12 h</sub>, C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>trough</sub> were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. PK data of children receiving similar dosages were used for comparison. The individual target C<sub>trough</sub> was defined as 1.0 mg/L. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA on log-transformed values with Tukey post hoc analysis to detect differences in LPV PK parameters between weight bands and NRTI backbones.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-one children were included in this substudy. Eleven children were excluded for varied reasons. There were nine children in the 14–19.9 kg weight band, 10 in 20–24.9 kg, 9 in 25–34.9 kg and 12 in ≥35 kg. The overall geometric mean (GM), (CV%) AUC<sub>0-12 h</sub> was 116.15 h*mg/L (37%) and the GM (CV%) C<sub>max</sub> was 12.52 mg/L (32%), which is comparable to the reference AUC<sub>0–12 h</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>. The GM (CV%) C<sub>trough</sub> of 7.71 mg/L (52%) in this sub-study is ∼57% higher than the reference value, and near to the C<sub>trough</sub> associated with dyslipidaemia in adults (8 mg/L), possibly explaining why CHAPAS-4 children on LPV/r showed the least favourable lipid profiles. The C<sub>trough</sub> and the C<sub>max</sub> were significantly higher in children weighing 25–34.9 kg (11.7 and 15.38 mg/L) compared to children in the 14–19.9 kg and ≥35 kg weight-bands (6.19 and 12.52 mg/L; 6.96 and 12.10 mg/L, respectively); <i>p</i>-values ranging from 0.021 to 0.048. These children received a higher milligram per kilogram body weight dose in the morning compared to children in the other weight bands. There was no difference in PK parameters when comparing according to backbone.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This PK sub-study shows that the AUC<sub>0–12 h</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> of LPV after administration of LPV/r with food in children 3–15 years of age weighing ≥14 kg on second-line treatment is comparable to reference data of children. In addition, it shows that the use of the adult LPV/r 200/50 mg tablet could potentially be extended from the currently WHO-recommended 35 kg down to 25 kg. Relatively high C<sub>trough</sub> concentrations may be associated with dyslipidaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 S1","pages":"12-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16294","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
15
Pharmacokinetic data of lopinavir/ritonavir in second-line treatment of African children living with HIV
Anne Kamphuis1, Hylke Waalewijn1,2, Alexander Szucbert3, Chishala Chabala4, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi5, Shafic Makumbi6, Joan Nangiya6, Vivian Mumbiro5, Veronica Mulenga4, Victor Mussiime6, David Burger1, Diana Gibb3 and Angela Colbers1
1Radboud Research Institute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboudumc;2Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town;3Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London;4University Teaching Hospital;5University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre;6Joint Clinical Research Centre
Background: Children living with HIV require specific strengths and formulations of antiretrovirals. Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is recommended by the WHO for children as preferred bPI for second-line. As paediatric 100/25 mg tablets have inconsistent availability in some countries, using adult 200/50 mg tablets for children could simplify procurement. For children weighing 25–34.9 kg, the daily recommended dose of 600/150 mg could be achieved by dosing two 200/50 mg tablets in the morning and one in the evening, instead of three 100/25 mg tablets twice daily (current WHO-recommendation). In CHAPAS-4 (#ISRCTN22964075), second-line treatment options for children with HIV were investigated. We performed a nested PK substudy to evaluate LPV/r exposure in children with different NRTI backbones.
Methods: Children with HIV aged 3–15 years failing NNRTI-based first-line treatment were randomized to four anchor drugs with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or standard-of-care NRTIs (abacavir or zidovudine with lamivudine). Children weighing 14–24.9 kg received 200/50 mg LPV/r twice daily; children weighing 25–34.9 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r in the morning and 200/50 mg in the evening; and children weighing ≥35 kg received 400/100 mg LPV/r twice daily. At steady state, PK blood samples were taken at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after LPV/r intake with food. LPV concentrations were measured using a validated HPLC method. Lopinavir AUC0–12 h, Cmax and Ctrough were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. PK data of children receiving similar dosages were used for comparison. The individual target Ctrough was defined as 1.0 mg/L. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA on log-transformed values with Tukey post hoc analysis to detect differences in LPV PK parameters between weight bands and NRTI backbones.
Results: Fifty-one children were included in this substudy. Eleven children were excluded for varied reasons. There were nine children in the 14–19.9 kg weight band, 10 in 20–24.9 kg, 9 in 25–34.9 kg and 12 in ≥35 kg. The overall geometric mean (GM), (CV%) AUC0-12 h was 116.15 h*mg/L (37%) and the GM (CV%) Cmax was 12.52 mg/L (32%), which is comparable to the reference AUC0–12 h and Cmax. The GM (CV%) Ctrough of 7.71 mg/L (52%) in this sub-study is ∼57% higher than the reference value, and near to the Ctrough associated with dyslipidaemia in adults (8 mg/L), possibly explaining why CHAPAS-4 children on LPV/r showed the least favourable lipid profiles. The Ctrough and the Cmax were significantly higher in children weighing 25–34.9 kg (11.7 and 15.38 mg/L) compared to children in the 14–19.9 kg and ≥35 kg weight-bands (6.19 and 12.52 mg/L; 6.96 and 12.10 mg/L, respectively); p-values ranging from 0.021 to 0.048. These children received a higher milligram per kilogram body weight dose in the morning compared to children in the other weight bands. There was no difference in PK parameters when comparing according to backbone.
Conclusions: This PK sub-study shows that the AUC0–12 h and Cmax of LPV after administration of LPV/r with food in children 3–15 years of age weighing ≥14 kg on second-line treatment is comparable to reference data of children. In addition, it shows that the use of the adult LPV/r 200/50 mg tablet could potentially be extended from the currently WHO-recommended 35 kg down to 25 kg. Relatively high Ctrough concentrations may be associated with dyslipidaemia.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.