Adherence insights from TAF/FTC-based art co-encapsulated with an ingestible sensor among virologically suppressed persons with HIV

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Adherence insights from TAF/FTC-based art co-encapsulated with an ingestible sensor among virologically suppressed persons with HIV","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>12</b></p><p><b>Adherence insights from TAF/FTC-based art co-encapsulated with an ingestible sensor among virologically suppressed persons with HIV</b></p><p>Ryan Coyle<sup>1</sup>, Vincent Mainella<sup>1</sup>, Mary Morrow<sup>1</sup>, Sarah Mann<sup>1</sup>, Stefanie Schwab<sup>1</sup>, Corwin Coppinger<sup>1</sup>, Nicholas Barker<sup>1</sup>, Samuel Ellis<sup>1</sup>, Tony Carnes<sup>2</sup>, Pamela Alpert<sup>2</sup>, Lucas Ellison<sup>1</sup>, Lane Bushman<sup>1</sup>, Kristina Brooks<sup>1</sup>, Samantha MaWhinney<sup>1</sup>, Jose Castillo-Mancilla<sup>1</sup> and Peter Anderson<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus;</i> <sup>2</sup><i>etectRx</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> QUANTI-TAF (NCT04065347) measured adherence for approximately 16 weeks using digital pills with ingestible sensors (ID-Cap System, etectRx) paired with tenofovir diphosphate/emtricitabine triphosphate (TFV-DP/FTC-TP) concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS) among 84 persons with HIV (PWH) receiving daily oral tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for ≥6 months. This analysis focused on digital pill adherence patterns.</p><p><b>Material and methods:</b> We categorized each recorded dose by interval length (&gt;36 h [late/missed]; 36–18 h [on-time]; &lt;18 h [early/stacked]). Chi-squared tests compared the proportion of observed dosing intervals and detected <i>vs</i>. manually entered doses. Kaplan–Meier analysis evaluated digital pill system use from enrolment to end of study, censored at week 16. We used generalized estimating equations with a logit link to calculate the odds ratio (OR [95% CI]) of a missed dose according to day of the week, or between Sunday–Thursday and Friday–Saturday. We summarized HIV-1 RNA, adherence and TFV-DP/FTC-TP in DBS at visits with suppressed HIV-1 RNA (&lt;200 copies/mL) and low (&lt;85%) cumulative (enrolment to visit) digital pill adherence as proportion (%) or median (IQR).</p><p><b>Results:</b> Overall, adherence was 93% (8650 recorded doses/9280 expected). Dosing intervals were mostly on-time (7991 [92%]), with smaller numbers of late/missed doses (356 [4%]) or early/stacked doses (303 [4%]), <i>p</i> &lt; .0001. Significantly more doses were detected (7948 [92%]) than manually entered (702 [8%]), <i>p</i> &lt; .0001. The proportion of participants on-study was 84/84 (100%) at week 4, 81/84 (96%) at week 8, 77/84 (92%) at week 12 and 73/84 (87%) at week 16. Median (IQR) cumulative adherence was 100% (100%–100%) at week 4 and 99% (96%–100%) at week 12 and at week 16. The OR (95% CI) for a missed dose was higher on Friday compared with Monday (1.35 [1.02, 1.79]; <i>p</i> = .04) or Tuesday (1.34 [1.04, 1.73]; <i>p</i> = .03), and on Saturday compared with Sunday (1.39 [1.08, 1.79]; <i>p</i> = .01), Monday (1.58 [1.14, 2.19]; <i>p</i> = .006), Tuesday (1.57 [1.23, 2.02]; <i>p</i> = .0004), Wednesday (1.38 [1.01, 1.88]; <i>p</i> = .04), or Thursday (1.47 [1.11, 1.96]; <i>p</i> = .008). Accordingly, the OR (95% CI) for a missed dose was higher on Friday–Saturday compared with Sunday–Thursday (1.37 [1.15, 1.63]; <i>p</i> = .0005). 335/404 total visits (83%) assessed HIV-1 RNA (all &lt;200 copies/mL) and 247/335 (74%) of these visits also had cumulative adherence results (not measured before enrolment). 19/247 (8%) of these visits showed virologic suppression with low cumulative adherence: HIV-1 RNA was 0, &lt;20 or between 26 and 86 copies/mL at 9/19 (47%), 4/19 (21%) and 6/19 (32%) visits, respectively. Median (IQR) cumulative adherence, TFV-DP in DBS and FTC-TP in DBS at these 19 visits was 79% (70%–82%), 2418 (2039–3444) fmol/punches and 2.79 (2.20–3.94) pmol/punches, respectively.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Digital pill system use remained high for 16 weeks and provided detailed adherence insights among virologically suppressed PWH receiving TAF/FTC-based ART. PWH receiving daily oral ART may stack doses to compensate for late/missed doses; missed doses were more likely to be on Friday–Saturday compared with Sunday–Thursday. Modern ART's potency is highlighted by virologic suppression even with intermittent non-adherence. Future research could leverage digital pill systems for adherence monitoring in clinical trials of novel oral dosing regimens such as long-acting weekly oral ART.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 S1","pages":"10-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

12

Adherence insights from TAF/FTC-based art co-encapsulated with an ingestible sensor among virologically suppressed persons with HIV

Ryan Coyle1, Vincent Mainella1, Mary Morrow1, Sarah Mann1, Stefanie Schwab1, Corwin Coppinger1, Nicholas Barker1, Samuel Ellis1, Tony Carnes2, Pamela Alpert2, Lucas Ellison1, Lane Bushman1, Kristina Brooks1, Samantha MaWhinney1, Jose Castillo-Mancilla1 and Peter Anderson1

1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus; 2etectRx

Background: QUANTI-TAF (NCT04065347) measured adherence for approximately 16 weeks using digital pills with ingestible sensors (ID-Cap System, etectRx) paired with tenofovir diphosphate/emtricitabine triphosphate (TFV-DP/FTC-TP) concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS) among 84 persons with HIV (PWH) receiving daily oral tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for ≥6 months. This analysis focused on digital pill adherence patterns.

Material and methods: We categorized each recorded dose by interval length (>36 h [late/missed]; 36–18 h [on-time]; <18 h [early/stacked]). Chi-squared tests compared the proportion of observed dosing intervals and detected vs. manually entered doses. Kaplan–Meier analysis evaluated digital pill system use from enrolment to end of study, censored at week 16. We used generalized estimating equations with a logit link to calculate the odds ratio (OR [95% CI]) of a missed dose according to day of the week, or between Sunday–Thursday and Friday–Saturday. We summarized HIV-1 RNA, adherence and TFV-DP/FTC-TP in DBS at visits with suppressed HIV-1 RNA (<200 copies/mL) and low (<85%) cumulative (enrolment to visit) digital pill adherence as proportion (%) or median (IQR).

Results: Overall, adherence was 93% (8650 recorded doses/9280 expected). Dosing intervals were mostly on-time (7991 [92%]), with smaller numbers of late/missed doses (356 [4%]) or early/stacked doses (303 [4%]), p < .0001. Significantly more doses were detected (7948 [92%]) than manually entered (702 [8%]), p < .0001. The proportion of participants on-study was 84/84 (100%) at week 4, 81/84 (96%) at week 8, 77/84 (92%) at week 12 and 73/84 (87%) at week 16. Median (IQR) cumulative adherence was 100% (100%–100%) at week 4 and 99% (96%–100%) at week 12 and at week 16. The OR (95% CI) for a missed dose was higher on Friday compared with Monday (1.35 [1.02, 1.79]; p = .04) or Tuesday (1.34 [1.04, 1.73]; p = .03), and on Saturday compared with Sunday (1.39 [1.08, 1.79]; p = .01), Monday (1.58 [1.14, 2.19]; p = .006), Tuesday (1.57 [1.23, 2.02]; p = .0004), Wednesday (1.38 [1.01, 1.88]; p = .04), or Thursday (1.47 [1.11, 1.96]; p = .008). Accordingly, the OR (95% CI) for a missed dose was higher on Friday–Saturday compared with Sunday–Thursday (1.37 [1.15, 1.63]; p = .0005). 335/404 total visits (83%) assessed HIV-1 RNA (all <200 copies/mL) and 247/335 (74%) of these visits also had cumulative adherence results (not measured before enrolment). 19/247 (8%) of these visits showed virologic suppression with low cumulative adherence: HIV-1 RNA was 0, <20 or between 26 and 86 copies/mL at 9/19 (47%), 4/19 (21%) and 6/19 (32%) visits, respectively. Median (IQR) cumulative adherence, TFV-DP in DBS and FTC-TP in DBS at these 19 visits was 79% (70%–82%), 2418 (2039–3444) fmol/punches and 2.79 (2.20–3.94) pmol/punches, respectively.

Conclusions: Digital pill system use remained high for 16 weeks and provided detailed adherence insights among virologically suppressed PWH receiving TAF/FTC-based ART. PWH receiving daily oral ART may stack doses to compensate for late/missed doses; missed doses were more likely to be on Friday–Saturday compared with Sunday–Thursday. Modern ART's potency is highlighted by virologic suppression even with intermittent non-adherence. Future research could leverage digital pill systems for adherence monitoring in clinical trials of novel oral dosing regimens such as long-acting weekly oral ART.

艾滋病、肝炎和其他抗病毒药物临床药理学国际研讨会摘要。
Nicholas Barker1、Samuel Ellis1、Tony Carnes2、Pamela Alpert2、Lucas Ellison1、Lane Bushman1、Kristina Brooks1、Samantha MaWhinney1、Jose Castillo-Mancilla1 和 Peter Anderson11科罗拉多大学安舒茨医学园区;2etectRx背景:QUANTI-TAF(NCT04065347)使用带有可摄取传感器的数字药丸(ID-Cap 系统)测量了约 16 周的依从性、etectRx)与干血斑(DBS)中的二磷酸替诺福韦/三磷酸恩曲他滨(TFV-DP/FTC-TP)浓度配对,测量了 84 名每天口服替诺福韦-阿拉芬酰胺/恩曲他滨(TAF/FTC)抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)≥6 个月的 HIV 感染者(PWH)的依从性。本分析主要关注数字药片的依从性模式:我们将每次记录的服药时间按间隔长度分类(36 小时[迟到/错过];36-18 小时[准时];18 小时[提前/叠加])。卡普兰-梅耶分析评估了观察到的用药间隔比例,以及检测到的剂量与手动输入的剂量之间的关系。卡普兰-梅耶分析评估了数字药丸系统从注册到研究结束的使用情况,并在第16周进行了删减。我们使用带有对数链接的广义估计方程,根据一周中的不同日期,或周日至周四和周五至周六,计算漏服剂量的几率比(OR [95% CI])。我们以比例(%)或中位数(IQR)的形式总结了HIV-1 RNA、依从性和TFV-DP/FTC-TP在HIV-1 RNA抑制(200拷贝/毫升)和数字药片依从性较低(85%)的DBS就诊中的情况:总体而言,服药依从性为 93%(8650 次记录服药/9280 次预期服药)。服药间隔大多准时(7991 次[92%]),晚服/漏服(356 次[4%])或早服/叠加服(303 次[4%])的情况较少,P <.0001。检测到的剂量(7948 [92%])明显多于手动输入的剂量(702 [8%]),p < .0001。第 4 周时,参与研究者的比例为 84/84 (100%),第 8 周时为 81/84 (96%),第 12 周时为 77/84 (92%),第 16 周时为 73/84 (87%)。第 4 周的累计依从性中位数(IQR)为 100%(100%-100%),第 12 周和第 16 周为 99%(96%-100%)。与周一(1.35 [1.02, 1.79];p = .04)或周二(1.34 [1.04, 1.73];p = .03)相比,周五漏服的 OR 值(95% CI)更高;与周日相比,周六漏服的 OR 值(1.39 [1.08, 1.79]; p = .01)、周一(1.58 [1.14, 2.19]; p = .006)、周二(1.57 [1.23, 2.02]; p = .0004)、周三(1.38 [1.01, 1.88]; p = .04)或周四(1.47 [1.11, 1.96]; p = .008)。因此,与周日至周四相比,周五至周六漏服剂量的 OR 值(95% CI)更高(1.37 [1.15, 1.63];p = .0005)。共有 335/404 人次(83%)评估了 HIV-1 RNA(均为 <200拷贝/毫升),其中 247/335 人次(74%)还获得了累积依从性结果(入组前未测定)。其中 19 次/247 人(8%)显示病毒学抑制,但累积依从性较低:在 9/19 次(47%)、4/19 次(21%)和 6/19 次(32%)就诊时,HIV-1 RNA 分别为 0、20 或 26 至 86 copies/mL。在这19次就诊中,DBS中TFV-DP和DBS中FTC-TP的累积依从性中位数(IQR)分别为79%(70%-82%)、2418(2039-3444)fmol/粒和2.79(2.20-3.94)pmol/粒:数字药丸系统的使用率在16周内保持较高水平,为接受TAF/FTC抗逆转录病毒疗法的病毒复制受到抑制的艾滋病患者提供了详细的依从性信息。接受每日口服抗逆转录病毒疗法的艾滋病感染者可能会叠加剂量,以弥补晚服/漏服的剂量;与周日至周四相比,漏服剂量更可能发生在周五至周六。现代抗逆转录病毒疗法的功效突出表现在即使间歇性不坚持治疗也能抑制病毒。未来的研究可以利用数字药丸系统对新型口服给药方案(如长效每周口服抗逆转录病毒疗法)的临床试验进行依从性监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信