Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas): a multicentre observational study evaluating pre-utilisation loss of nitrous oxide
Megan A.F. Thomas , Christopher J. Ward , Matthew E. Sinnott , Thomas W. Davies , Jan M. Wong , Joanna K.L. Wong , Gudrun Kunst , Sibtain Anwar
{"title":"Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas): a multicentre observational study evaluating pre-utilisation loss of nitrous oxide","authors":"Megan A.F. Thomas , Christopher J. Ward , Matthew E. Sinnott , Thomas W. Davies , Jan M. Wong , Joanna K.L. Wong , Gudrun Kunst , Sibtain Anwar","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes significantly to the healthcare sector's carbon footprint. Pre-utilisation losses of N<sub>2</sub>O are up to 95%. Decommissioning manifolds can reduce these losses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hospitals in our Greater London research network with at least one active N<sub>2</sub>O manifold were included in the Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas) study. N<sub>2</sub>O utilisation data were collected continuously over 5 days and extrapolated over a year, in addition to collecting procurement records from the preceding financial year. The primary outcome was the discrepancy between clinically utilised N<sub>2</sub>O and the quantity procured by hospitals, referred to as the ‘N<sub>2</sub>O gap’. Secondary outcomes included anaesthetists' self-reported utilisation of N<sub>2</sub>O and their opinions on manifold decommissioning.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen of 53 hospitals were included. In total, 6 487 200 L of N<sub>2</sub>O were procured with a median (IQR) of 304 200 (183 600–473 400) L per site. During the 5-day data collection period, sites utilised a median (IQR) of 501 (42–1409) L of N<sub>2</sub>O. Extrapolating over a year resulted in a median (IQR) annual utilisation of 36 573 (3066–102 857) L per site and a total of 1 175 348 L. This represented an estimated 18% of the N<sub>2</sub>O procured, suggesting pre-utilisation losses of 5 311 852 L. Among surveyed anaesthetists, 70% (<em>n</em>=309) reported using N<sub>2</sub>O within the previous year, with one-third (<em>n</em>=97) using it once a week or more. There was widespread support for decommissioning manifolds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Consistent with other reports, the data demonstrate a substantial discrepancy between the quantities of N<sub>2</sub>O procured and utilised clinically, indicative of significant pre-utilisation losses. Our findings support the decommissioning of N<sub>2</sub>O manifolds for environmental and economic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"133 6","pages":"Pages 1427-1434"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224005075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes significantly to the healthcare sector's carbon footprint. Pre-utilisation losses of N2O are up to 95%. Decommissioning manifolds can reduce these losses.
Methods
Hospitals in our Greater London research network with at least one active N2O manifold were included in the Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas) study. N2O utilisation data were collected continuously over 5 days and extrapolated over a year, in addition to collecting procurement records from the preceding financial year. The primary outcome was the discrepancy between clinically utilised N2O and the quantity procured by hospitals, referred to as the ‘N2O gap’. Secondary outcomes included anaesthetists' self-reported utilisation of N2O and their opinions on manifold decommissioning.
Results
Eighteen of 53 hospitals were included. In total, 6 487 200 L of N2O were procured with a median (IQR) of 304 200 (183 600–473 400) L per site. During the 5-day data collection period, sites utilised a median (IQR) of 501 (42–1409) L of N2O. Extrapolating over a year resulted in a median (IQR) annual utilisation of 36 573 (3066–102 857) L per site and a total of 1 175 348 L. This represented an estimated 18% of the N2O procured, suggesting pre-utilisation losses of 5 311 852 L. Among surveyed anaesthetists, 70% (n=309) reported using N2O within the previous year, with one-third (n=97) using it once a week or more. There was widespread support for decommissioning manifolds.
Conclusions
Consistent with other reports, the data demonstrate a substantial discrepancy between the quantities of N2O procured and utilised clinically, indicative of significant pre-utilisation losses. Our findings support the decommissioning of N2O manifolds for environmental and economic benefits.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.