Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas): a multicentre observational study evaluating pre-utilisation loss of nitrous oxide

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Megan A.F. Thomas , Christopher J. Ward , Matthew E. Sinnott , Thomas W. Davies , Jan M. Wong , Joanna K.L. Wong , Gudrun Kunst , Sibtain Anwar
{"title":"Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas): a multicentre observational study evaluating pre-utilisation loss of nitrous oxide","authors":"Megan A.F. Thomas ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Ward ,&nbsp;Matthew E. Sinnott ,&nbsp;Thomas W. Davies ,&nbsp;Jan M. Wong ,&nbsp;Joanna K.L. Wong ,&nbsp;Gudrun Kunst ,&nbsp;Sibtain Anwar","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes significantly to the healthcare sector's carbon footprint. Pre-utilisation losses of N<sub>2</sub>O are up to 95%. Decommissioning manifolds can reduce these losses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hospitals in our Greater London research network with at least one active N<sub>2</sub>O manifold were included in the Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas) study. N<sub>2</sub>O utilisation data were collected continuously over 5 days and extrapolated over a year, in addition to collecting procurement records from the preceding financial year. The primary outcome was the discrepancy between clinically utilised N<sub>2</sub>O and the quantity procured by hospitals, referred to as the ‘N<sub>2</sub>O gap’. Secondary outcomes included anaesthetists' self-reported utilisation of N<sub>2</sub>O and their opinions on manifold decommissioning.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen of 53 hospitals were included. In total, 6 487 200 L of N<sub>2</sub>O were procured with a median (IQR) of 304 200 (183 600–473 400) L per site. During the 5-day data collection period, sites utilised a median (IQR) of 501 (42–1409) L of N<sub>2</sub>O. Extrapolating over a year resulted in a median (IQR) annual utilisation of 36 573 (3066–102 857) L per site and a total of 1 175 348 L. This represented an estimated 18% of the N<sub>2</sub>O procured, suggesting pre-utilisation losses of 5 311 852 L. Among surveyed anaesthetists, 70% (<em>n</em>=309) reported using N<sub>2</sub>O within the previous year, with one-third (<em>n</em>=97) using it once a week or more. There was widespread support for decommissioning manifolds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Consistent with other reports, the data demonstrate a substantial discrepancy between the quantities of N<sub>2</sub>O procured and utilised clinically, indicative of significant pre-utilisation losses. Our findings support the decommissioning of N<sub>2</sub>O manifolds for environmental and economic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"133 6","pages":"Pages 1427-1434"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224005075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes significantly to the healthcare sector's carbon footprint. Pre-utilisation losses of N2O are up to 95%. Decommissioning manifolds can reduce these losses.

Methods

Hospitals in our Greater London research network with at least one active N2O manifold were included in the Nitrous Oxide Manifold and Other Reduction of Emissions (NoMoreGas) study. N2O utilisation data were collected continuously over 5 days and extrapolated over a year, in addition to collecting procurement records from the preceding financial year. The primary outcome was the discrepancy between clinically utilised N2O and the quantity procured by hospitals, referred to as the ‘N2O gap’. Secondary outcomes included anaesthetists' self-reported utilisation of N2O and their opinions on manifold decommissioning.

Results

Eighteen of 53 hospitals were included. In total, 6 487 200 L of N2O were procured with a median (IQR) of 304 200 (183 600–473 400) L per site. During the 5-day data collection period, sites utilised a median (IQR) of 501 (42–1409) L of N2O. Extrapolating over a year resulted in a median (IQR) annual utilisation of 36 573 (3066–102 857) L per site and a total of 1 175 348 L. This represented an estimated 18% of the N2O procured, suggesting pre-utilisation losses of 5 311 852 L. Among surveyed anaesthetists, 70% (n=309) reported using N2O within the previous year, with one-third (n=97) using it once a week or more. There was widespread support for decommissioning manifolds.

Conclusions

Consistent with other reports, the data demonstrate a substantial discrepancy between the quantities of N2O procured and utilised clinically, indicative of significant pre-utilisation losses. Our findings support the decommissioning of N2O manifolds for environmental and economic benefits.
一氧化二氮歧管和其他减排(NoMoreGas):评估一氧化二氮使用前损失的多中心观察研究。
背景:一氧化二氮(N2O)是一种强效温室气体,对医疗保健行业的碳足迹有重大影响。一氧化二氮在使用前的损失高达 95%。方法:大伦敦研究网络中至少有一个使用中的一氧化二氮歧管的医院被纳入一氧化二氮歧管和其他减排(NoMoreGas)研究。除了收集上一财政年度的采购记录外,还连续收集了 5 天的一氧化二氮使用数据,并推算出一年的使用情况。主要结果是临床使用的一氧化二氮与医院采购量之间的差异,即 "一氧化二氮缺口"。次要结果包括麻醉师自我报告的一氧化二氮使用情况以及他们对多方面退役的意见:53 家医院中有 18 家被纳入研究范围。总共采购了 6 487 200 升一氧化二氮,每家医院的中位数(IQR)为 304 200 升(183 600-473 400)。在为期 5 天的数据收集期间,各医院使用的一氧化二氮中位数(IQR)为 501(42-1409)升。在接受调查的麻醉师中,70%(样本数=309)的麻醉师表示在过去一年中使用过一氧化二氮,其中三分之一(样本数=97)的麻醉师每周使用一氧化二氮一次或一次以上。大家普遍支持退役歧管:与其他报告一致,数据显示一氧化二氮的采购量和临床使用量之间存在巨大差异,表明使用前的损失巨大。我们的研究结果支持退役 N2O 歧管,以获得环境和经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信