Sensitivity analysis of planetary boundary layer parameterization on meteorological simulations in the Yangtze river delta region, China†

IF 2.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dihui Chen, Ansheng Zhu, Ling Huang, Elly Yaluk, Yangjun Wang, Maggie Chel Gee Ooi, Ying Gu, Andy Chan and Li Li
{"title":"Sensitivity analysis of planetary boundary layer parameterization on meteorological simulations in the Yangtze river delta region, China†","authors":"Dihui Chen, Ansheng Zhu, Ling Huang, Elly Yaluk, Yangjun Wang, Maggie Chel Gee Ooi, Ying Gu, Andy Chan and Li Li","doi":"10.1039/D4EA00038B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The planetary boundary layer (PBL) plays a crucial role in determining meteorological fields and the diffusion of atmospheric pollutants. Therefore, accurate PBL simulation is necessary for precise meteorological and air quality simulations, and the choice of PBL scheme significantly influences the accuracy of simulation results. In this study, we investigate the seasonal and diurnal variations of typical meteorological variables over the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region by using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using four different closure schemes. These closure schemes include two non-local closure schemes, <em>i.e.</em>, Yonsei University (YSU) and Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 (ACM2), as well as two local closure schemes named Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ) and Mellor–Yamada Nakanishi and Niino (MYNN). By comparing observations and model inter-comparisons, we discuss the similarities and differences in simulated results among different PBL schemes. The results indicate that local closure schemes, <em>i.e.</em>, MYJ and MYNN, generally produce more realistic simulations of meteorological parameters. MYNN performs best in summer with a mean bias (MB) of 0.41 °C for temperature and 0.44 m s<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for wind speed, while MYJ shows better results under stable conditions during winter with a MB of 0.64 °C for temperature and −5.76% for relative humidity. YSU is found to have less bias in PBL height during summer with the highest <em>R</em> up to 0.81, while MYJ outperforms the three other schemes with the least MB of 38 m (<em>R</em> = 0.65) in winter. Each PBL closure scheme, <em>i.e.</em>, the MYJ and MYNN local closure schemes, may not accurately capture all physical processes, leading to performance variations, especially during transitional seasons and under specific diurnal conditions. Thus, it is important to note that each scheme has its strengths and weaknesses, and the selection of the most appropriate scheme should depend on the specific variables and scenarios under consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":72942,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science: atmospheres","volume":" 10","pages":" 1129-1144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ea/d4ea00038b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science: atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ea/d4ea00038b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The planetary boundary layer (PBL) plays a crucial role in determining meteorological fields and the diffusion of atmospheric pollutants. Therefore, accurate PBL simulation is necessary for precise meteorological and air quality simulations, and the choice of PBL scheme significantly influences the accuracy of simulation results. In this study, we investigate the seasonal and diurnal variations of typical meteorological variables over the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region by using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using four different closure schemes. These closure schemes include two non-local closure schemes, i.e., Yonsei University (YSU) and Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 (ACM2), as well as two local closure schemes named Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ) and Mellor–Yamada Nakanishi and Niino (MYNN). By comparing observations and model inter-comparisons, we discuss the similarities and differences in simulated results among different PBL schemes. The results indicate that local closure schemes, i.e., MYJ and MYNN, generally produce more realistic simulations of meteorological parameters. MYNN performs best in summer with a mean bias (MB) of 0.41 °C for temperature and 0.44 m s−1 for wind speed, while MYJ shows better results under stable conditions during winter with a MB of 0.64 °C for temperature and −5.76% for relative humidity. YSU is found to have less bias in PBL height during summer with the highest R up to 0.81, while MYJ outperforms the three other schemes with the least MB of 38 m (R = 0.65) in winter. Each PBL closure scheme, i.e., the MYJ and MYNN local closure schemes, may not accurately capture all physical processes, leading to performance variations, especially during transitional seasons and under specific diurnal conditions. Thus, it is important to note that each scheme has its strengths and weaknesses, and the selection of the most appropriate scheme should depend on the specific variables and scenarios under consideration.

Abstract Image

行星边界层参数化对中国长江三角洲地区气象模拟的敏感性分析†。
行星边界层(PBL)在决定气象场和大气污染物扩散方面起着至关重要的作用。因此,精确的行星边界层模拟是精确气象和空气质量模拟的必要条件,而行星边界层方案的选择对模拟结果的准确性有很大影响。在本研究中,我们利用天气研究和预报(WRF)模式,采用四种不同的闭合方案,研究了长江三角洲(YRD)地区典型气象变量的季节和昼夜变化。这些闭合方案包括两个非本地闭合方案,即延世大学(YSU)和非对称对流模式第 2 版(ACM2),以及两个本地闭合方案,即 Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ) 和 Mellor-Yamada Nakanishi and Niino (MYNN)。通过比较观测数据和模型之间的相互比较,我们讨论了不同 PBL 方案模拟结果的异同。结果表明,局部闭合方案,即 MYJ 和 MYNN,通常能模拟出更真实的气象参数。MYNN 在夏季表现最佳,温度平均偏差(MB)为 0.41 ℃,风速平均偏差(MB)为 0.44 m s-1;而 MYJ 在冬季稳定条件下表现更好,温度平均偏差(MB)为 0.64 ℃,相对湿度平均偏差(MB)为-5.76%。在夏季,YSU 的 PBL 高度偏差较小,R 值最高,达 0.81;而在冬季,MYJ 的 MB 值最小,为 38 米(R = 0.65),优于其他三种方案。每个 PBL 闭合方案,即 MYJ 和 MYNN 局部闭合方案,可能无法准确捕捉所有物理过程,从而导致性能差异,特别是在过渡季节和特定昼夜条件下。因此,需要注意的是,每种方案都有其优缺点,选择最合适的方案应取决于所考虑的具体变量和情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信