Traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures management in adult patients: A single-center experience.

Çağlar Türk, Nail Ozdemir
{"title":"Traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures management in adult patients: A single-center experience.","authors":"Çağlar Türk, Nail Ozdemir","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.57658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to describe our clinical experience with surgical approaches and patient management for traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients with continuous and noncontinuous multiple-level thoracolumbar fractures who were operated on by the same surgical team from 2019 to 2021. These patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=12, continuous fractures) and Group 2 (n=14, noncontinuous fractures). We assessed the patients' age, gender, fracture levels, fracture type, classification according to the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) Spine Thoracolumbar Fracture Classification, status of posterior ligament damage, presence of additional traumatic pathology, status of decompression via laminectomy, levels of stabilization and fusion, preoperative and postoperative neurological status, presence of cervical trauma, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and lordosis and kyphosis angles in terms of fusion status and postoperative follow-up over two years. The study excluded patients over the age of 65, those with single-level fractures, and pathological fractures caused by osteoporosis, infection, or spinal tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gender, age, neurological status, application of laminectomy, surgical complications, status of cervical fracture, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, lordosis, and kyphosis angles were uniformly distributed between the groups. All patients underwent fusions, ranging from three to eight, with a median of two (range 2-4) fracture levels, and a median of five instrumented vertebrae, ranging from four to seven. Significant differences between the two groups were observed in terms of operation duration (p=0.001), blood loss (p=0.010), duration of hospitalization (p=0.003), number of fusions (p<0.001), and instrumented vertebral segments (p=0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, a surgical approach involving decompression, vertebral fusion screws, allografts, and bone substitutes can enhance surgical outcomes for patients with continuous and noncontinuous vertebral fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.57658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to describe our clinical experience with surgical approaches and patient management for traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with continuous and noncontinuous multiple-level thoracolumbar fractures who were operated on by the same surgical team from 2019 to 2021. These patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=12, continuous fractures) and Group 2 (n=14, noncontinuous fractures). We assessed the patients' age, gender, fracture levels, fracture type, classification according to the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) Spine Thoracolumbar Fracture Classification, status of posterior ligament damage, presence of additional traumatic pathology, status of decompression via laminectomy, levels of stabilization and fusion, preoperative and postoperative neurological status, presence of cervical trauma, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and lordosis and kyphosis angles in terms of fusion status and postoperative follow-up over two years. The study excluded patients over the age of 65, those with single-level fractures, and pathological fractures caused by osteoporosis, infection, or spinal tumors.

Results: Gender, age, neurological status, application of laminectomy, surgical complications, status of cervical fracture, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, lordosis, and kyphosis angles were uniformly distributed between the groups. All patients underwent fusions, ranging from three to eight, with a median of two (range 2-4) fracture levels, and a median of five instrumented vertebrae, ranging from four to seven. Significant differences between the two groups were observed in terms of operation duration (p=0.001), blood loss (p=0.010), duration of hospitalization (p=0.003), number of fusions (p<0.001), and instrumented vertebral segments (p=0.011).

Conclusion: Thus, a surgical approach involving decompression, vertebral fusion screws, allografts, and bone substitutes can enhance surgical outcomes for patients with continuous and noncontinuous vertebral fractures.

成年患者创伤性多发连续性和非连续性胸腰椎骨折的治疗:单中心经验。
背景:本研究旨在描述我们对创伤性多水平连续性和非连续性胸腰椎骨折的手术方法和患者管理的临床经验:本研究旨在描述我们在创伤性多水平连续性和非连续性胸腰椎骨折的手术方法和患者管理方面的临床经验:我们回顾性评估了2019年至2021年由同一手术团队进行手术的连续性和非连续性多水平胸腰椎骨折患者。这些患者被分为两组:第一组(12 人,连续骨折)和第二组(14 人,非连续骨折)。我们评估了患者的年龄、性别、骨折程度、骨折类型、AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)脊柱胸腰椎骨折分类、后韧带损伤情况、是否存在其他创伤性病变、椎板切除减压情况、稳定和融合程度、术前和术后神经状况、是否有颈椎创伤、手术时间、失血量、住院时间、融合状况下的前凸和后凸角度以及术后两年的随访情况。研究排除了 65 岁以上的患者、单发骨折患者以及由骨质疏松症、感染或脊柱肿瘤引起的病理性骨折患者:两组患者的性别、年龄、神经系统状况、椎板切除术的应用、手术并发症、颈椎骨折状况、手术时间、失血量、住院时间、脊柱前凸和后凸角度分布一致。所有患者都接受了融合术,融合范围从 3 到 8,骨折水平中位数为 2(范围 2-4),椎体器械中位数为 5(范围 4-7)。两组患者在手术时间(P=0.001)、失血量(P=0.010)、住院时间(P=0.003)、融合次数(P=0.003)方面存在显著差异:因此,采用减压、椎体融合螺钉、同种异体材料和骨替代物的手术方法可以提高连续性和非连续性椎体骨折患者的手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信