Trans-syndesmotic fixation in supination external rotation type 4 injuries: Are intraoperative tests reliable?

Gürkan Çalışkan, Yunus Elmas, Orhun Çelik
{"title":"Trans-syndesmotic fixation in supination external rotation type 4 injuries: Are intraoperative tests reliable?","authors":"Gürkan Çalışkan, Yunus Elmas, Orhun Çelik","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.37225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle fractures occur due to a rotational mechanism. According to the Lauge-Hansen classification, supination-external rotation (SER) injuries are the most common type. Following osseous fixation, the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries in these injuries are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological results of trans-syndesmotic fixation using intraoperative tests in SER type 4 ankle injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ankle syndesmosis was intraoperatively evaluated using cotton/hook and manual external rotation stress tests in 64 patients with SER type 4 fracture dislocation injuries. These patients were divided into two groups: those treated with and without trans-syndesmotic fixation in addition to open reduction and internal fixation of the fractures. Ankle range of motion (ROM), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, and Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), tibiofibular overlap, tibiofibular clear space, and joint arthritis based on the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median values of OMAS (Z=-3.92, p<0.001), AOFAS (Z=-4.31, p<0.001), and ROM (Z=-2.95, p=0.003) were higher in Group 1. There were no differences between the groups regarding tibiofibular overlap median values (Z=-0.59, p=0.0554), tibiofibular clear space (Z=-1.13, p=0.258), and Kellgren-Lawrence arthritis scale. Lack of posterior malleolus fixation was found to increase the risk of arthritis by 18.197 times, despite having trans-syndesmotic fixation, which was statistically significant (Confidence Interval, CI: 2.482-133.417, p=0.004) (Table 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Median values of OMAS, AOFAS, and ROM in patients without trans-syndesmotic fixation were lower. These results indicate that intraoperative tests may not provide entirely accurate results in SER type 4 injuries. Failure to detect a syndesmotic injury timely can result in instability. Therefore, we think that routine trans-syndesmotic fixation, as well as posterior malleolus fixation in SER type 4 ankle injuries, may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.37225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ankle fractures occur due to a rotational mechanism. According to the Lauge-Hansen classification, supination-external rotation (SER) injuries are the most common type. Following osseous fixation, the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries in these injuries are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological results of trans-syndesmotic fixation using intraoperative tests in SER type 4 ankle injuries.

Methods: Ankle syndesmosis was intraoperatively evaluated using cotton/hook and manual external rotation stress tests in 64 patients with SER type 4 fracture dislocation injuries. These patients were divided into two groups: those treated with and without trans-syndesmotic fixation in addition to open reduction and internal fixation of the fractures. Ankle range of motion (ROM), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, and Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), tibiofibular overlap, tibiofibular clear space, and joint arthritis based on the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale were evaluated.

Results: Median values of OMAS (Z=-3.92, p<0.001), AOFAS (Z=-4.31, p<0.001), and ROM (Z=-2.95, p=0.003) were higher in Group 1. There were no differences between the groups regarding tibiofibular overlap median values (Z=-0.59, p=0.0554), tibiofibular clear space (Z=-1.13, p=0.258), and Kellgren-Lawrence arthritis scale. Lack of posterior malleolus fixation was found to increase the risk of arthritis by 18.197 times, despite having trans-syndesmotic fixation, which was statistically significant (Confidence Interval, CI: 2.482-133.417, p=0.004) (Table 4).

Conclusion: Median values of OMAS, AOFAS, and ROM in patients without trans-syndesmotic fixation were lower. These results indicate that intraoperative tests may not provide entirely accurate results in SER type 4 injuries. Failure to detect a syndesmotic injury timely can result in instability. Therefore, we think that routine trans-syndesmotic fixation, as well as posterior malleolus fixation in SER type 4 ankle injuries, may improve outcomes.

经腱鞘固定治疗上翻外旋4型损伤:术中测试可靠吗?
背景:踝关节骨折是由于旋转机制造成的。根据劳格-汉森(Lauge-Hansen)的分类,上翻-外旋(SER)损伤是最常见的类型。在骨性固定后,这些损伤中联合肌损伤的评估和治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过术中测试评估经巩膜固定术治疗 SER 第 4 型踝关节损伤的临床、功能和放射学效果:方法: 对 64 名 SER 4 型骨折脱位患者进行踝关节巩膜术中评估,使用棉花/钩和手动外旋应力测试。这些患者被分为两组:在骨折切开复位和内固定的基础上进行经巩膜固定治疗和未进行经巩膜固定治疗的患者。根据凯尔格伦-劳伦斯(K-L)量表对踝关节活动范围(ROM)、美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分、奥勒德-莫兰德踝关节评分(OMAS)、胫腓骨重叠度、胫腓骨间隙和关节炎进行了评估:结果:OMAS 的中位值(Z=-3.92,p结论:未进行经腱鞘固定的患者的 OMAS、AOFAS 和 ROM 中位值较低。这些结果表明,术中测试可能无法为 SER 4 型损伤提供完全准确的结果。如果不能及时发现巩膜损伤,可能会导致不稳定。因此,我们认为对 SER 第 4 型踝关节损伤进行常规经巩膜固定和后踝骨固定可能会改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信