{"title":"A time-series analysis examining implementation strategies to increase use of an early-supported discharge hospital at home model","authors":"Padageshwar Sunkara MD, MMCi, Raghava Nagaraj MD, MPH, Hieu Nguyen MS, Stephanie Murphy DO, Kevin Goslen MD, Harsh Barot MD, Timothy Hetherington MS, Casey Stephens MPH, McKenzie Isreal MPH, Marc Kowalkowski PhD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Early-supported discharge (ESD) hospital-at-home (HaH) programs facilitate hospitalized patients to receive ongoing acute-level care at home, thereby promoting patient-centeredness while improving hospital throughput.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The current study aimed to test multiple implementation strategies to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted interrupted time series analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies on weekly HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization at five hospitals. Intervention 1 included provider-focused education and HaH nurse navigator support (July 2021 to May 2022). Intervention 2 added provider-level referral performance feedback and daily electronic health record-based eligibility reports (May 2022 to December 2022). During postintervention (January 2023 to June 2023), implementation strategies were no longer supported by the study team. Clinical outcomes were assessed over time and between patient subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 5951 HaH ESD patients overall. After Intervention 2, we observed immediate increases in weekly HaH ESD referrals (level change mean difference [MD, 95% confidence interval]: 14.8, 5.9–23.6) and capacity utilization (level change MD: 13.9%, 6.2%–21.5%) and additional week-to-week increases in capacity utilization (slope change MD: 0.6%, 0.2%–0.9%), compared to Intervention 1 trends. HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization were sustained postintervention. The proportion of provider-initiated referrals increased over time (Intervention 1: 79.4%, Intervention 2: 90.9%, postintervention: 95.2%). As HaH ESD utilization increased, we observed shorter inpatient length of stay and fewer HaH ESD encounters per visit (<i>p</i> < 0.01). There were small, statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and readmission for residents of rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Applying referral-focused provider feedback and daily eligibility reports were effective within a multicomponent approach to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 4","pages":"344-351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Early-supported discharge (ESD) hospital-at-home (HaH) programs facilitate hospitalized patients to receive ongoing acute-level care at home, thereby promoting patient-centeredness while improving hospital throughput.
Objectives
The current study aimed to test multiple implementation strategies to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.
Methods
We conducted interrupted time series analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies on weekly HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization at five hospitals. Intervention 1 included provider-focused education and HaH nurse navigator support (July 2021 to May 2022). Intervention 2 added provider-level referral performance feedback and daily electronic health record-based eligibility reports (May 2022 to December 2022). During postintervention (January 2023 to June 2023), implementation strategies were no longer supported by the study team. Clinical outcomes were assessed over time and between patient subgroups.
Results
There were 5951 HaH ESD patients overall. After Intervention 2, we observed immediate increases in weekly HaH ESD referrals (level change mean difference [MD, 95% confidence interval]: 14.8, 5.9–23.6) and capacity utilization (level change MD: 13.9%, 6.2%–21.5%) and additional week-to-week increases in capacity utilization (slope change MD: 0.6%, 0.2%–0.9%), compared to Intervention 1 trends. HaH ESD referrals and capacity utilization were sustained postintervention. The proportion of provider-initiated referrals increased over time (Intervention 1: 79.4%, Intervention 2: 90.9%, postintervention: 95.2%). As HaH ESD utilization increased, we observed shorter inpatient length of stay and fewer HaH ESD encounters per visit (p < 0.01). There were small, statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and readmission for residents of rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.
Conclusion
Applying referral-focused provider feedback and daily eligibility reports were effective within a multicomponent approach to increase and sustain HaH ESD utilization.
期刊介绍:
JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children.
Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.