"We don't get that information right back to us unless it's a full-blown cancer": Challenges coordinating lung cancer screening across healthcare systems.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rendelle E Bolton, Eduardo R Núñez, Jacqueline Boudreau, Lauren M Kearney, Samantha K Ryan, Abigail Herbst, Christopher Slatore, Renda Soylemez Wiener
{"title":"\"We don't get that information right back to us unless it's a full-blown cancer\": Challenges coordinating lung cancer screening across healthcare systems.","authors":"Rendelle E Bolton, Eduardo R Núñez, Jacqueline Boudreau, Lauren M Kearney, Samantha K Ryan, Abigail Herbst, Christopher Slatore, Renda Soylemez Wiener","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how lung cancer screening (LCS) is coordinated across healthcare systems, specifically Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA settings.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>We conducted primary qualitative data collection in six VA medical centers with established LCS programs from November 2020 to November 2021.</p><p><strong>Study design and data collection methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 primary care providers, LCS program coordinators and directors, and pulmonologists. Thematic analysis examined spontaneously raised narratives related to initiating and coordinating LCS for Veterans screened in non-VA settings. We mapped coordination challenges to each step of the LCS care continuum.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>While non-VA options increased access to LCS for Veterans, VA medical centers lacked clear processes for initiating LCS referrals and tracking Veterans across the LCS continuum when screening occurred in non-VA settings. The responsibility of coordinating LCS with community providers often fell to VA primary care providers rather than LCS programs. Gaps in communication and data transfer contributed to delayed evaluation of potentially cancerous nodules post-screening, raising concerns about compromised care quality when LCS was shared with non-VA settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While policies expanding LCS for Veterans in non-VA settings increase access, lack of consistent processes to initiate referrals, obtain results, and promote timely downstream evaluation fragmented care and delayed evaluation of concerning nodules. These unintended consequences highlight a need to address cross-system coordination challenges. Strategies to better coordinate LCS between VA and non-VA settings are essential to achieve high quality LCS and prevent Veterans from falling through the cracks.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine how lung cancer screening (LCS) is coordinated across healthcare systems, specifically Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA settings.

Data sources and study setting: We conducted primary qualitative data collection in six VA medical centers with established LCS programs from November 2020 to November 2021.

Study design and data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 primary care providers, LCS program coordinators and directors, and pulmonologists. Thematic analysis examined spontaneously raised narratives related to initiating and coordinating LCS for Veterans screened in non-VA settings. We mapped coordination challenges to each step of the LCS care continuum.

Principal findings: While non-VA options increased access to LCS for Veterans, VA medical centers lacked clear processes for initiating LCS referrals and tracking Veterans across the LCS continuum when screening occurred in non-VA settings. The responsibility of coordinating LCS with community providers often fell to VA primary care providers rather than LCS programs. Gaps in communication and data transfer contributed to delayed evaluation of potentially cancerous nodules post-screening, raising concerns about compromised care quality when LCS was shared with non-VA settings.

Conclusions: While policies expanding LCS for Veterans in non-VA settings increase access, lack of consistent processes to initiate referrals, obtain results, and promote timely downstream evaluation fragmented care and delayed evaluation of concerning nodules. These unintended consequences highlight a need to address cross-system coordination challenges. Strategies to better coordinate LCS between VA and non-VA settings are essential to achieve high quality LCS and prevent Veterans from falling through the cracks.

"除非是全面爆发的癌症,否则我们无法立即得到相关信息":跨医疗系统协调肺癌筛查的挑战。
目的研究肺癌筛查(LCS)如何在医疗保健系统中协调,特别是在退伍军人事务部(VA)和非退伍军人事务部的环境中:从 2020 年 11 月到 2021 年 11 月,我们在六个已建立肺癌筛查项目的退伍军人事务部医疗中心进行了主要定性数据收集:我们对 48 名初级医疗服务提供者、LCS 项目协调员和主任以及肺病专家进行了半结构化访谈。主题分析检查了自发提出的与启动和协调在非退伍军人环境中筛查的退伍军人 LCS 相关的叙述。我们将协调挑战映射到 LCS 护理连续体的每一步:虽然非退伍军人的选择增加了退伍军人获得长期护理服务的机会,但退伍军人医疗中心缺乏明确的流程来启动长期护理服务转介,并在非退伍军人医疗中心进行筛查时跟踪整个长期护理服务过程中的退伍军人情况。与社区医疗服务提供者协调 LCS 的责任往往落在退伍军人事务部初级医疗服务提供者身上,而不是 LCS 项目上。沟通和数据传输方面的差距导致筛查后对潜在癌症结节的评估延迟,从而引发了人们对与非退伍军人机构共享 LCS 时护理质量受损的担忧:虽然扩大退伍军人在非退伍军人机构中的 LCS 的政策增加了可及性,但由于缺乏启动转诊、获取结果和促进及时下游评估的一致流程,导致护理工作支离破碎,并延误了对有关结节的评估。这些意外后果凸显了解决跨系统协调难题的必要性。在退伍军人机构和非退伍军人机构之间更好地协调 LCS 的策略对于实现高质量的 LCS 和防止退伍军人漏诊至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信