How parenting styles affect the development of language skills and reading comprehension in primary school students

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Liyan Yu, Jing Huang, Phil Duo Liu, Susanna Siu-Sze Yeung, Dan Lin, Him Cheung, Xiuhong Tong
{"title":"How parenting styles affect the development of language skills and reading comprehension in primary school students","authors":"Liyan Yu,&nbsp;Jing Huang,&nbsp;Phil Duo Liu,&nbsp;Susanna Siu-Sze Yeung,&nbsp;Dan Lin,&nbsp;Him Cheung,&nbsp;Xiuhong Tong","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined how parenting styles influence children's language skills and reading comprehension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Six hundred and eighty-five Chinese-speaking third graders (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 9.23 years, SD = .66; 341 girls) were randomly recruited from eight primary schools. We measured students' primary caregivers' parenting styles, parental education, family income, migration status, number of children's extracurricular books in the home and family cohesion at Wave 1 (i.e. grade 3). We also assessed students' reading motivation, language skills (i.e. vocabulary knowledge and syntactic awareness) and reading comprehension at Wave 2 (i.e. grade 4).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The structural equation model analysis revealed that parenting styles indirectly affect language and reading comprehension development, with authoritative and authoritarian parenting exerting different influences on the two outcomes. Specifically, authoritative parenting was positively related to the number of children's books, which in turn was directly, or indirectly through reading motivation, associated with children's language skills and reading comprehension. In contrast, authoritarian parenting was negatively related to family cohesion, which was associated with children's reading motivation, and consequently, their language skills and reading comprehension. The multigroup analysis showed that the indirect pathways varied slightly across parental migration statuses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings enhance the global understanding of the pathways linking parenting styles to children's language skills and reading comprehension, suggesting that educators and researchers should not overly emphasize the direct role of parenting styles in children's academic performance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":"94 4","pages":"1245-1270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjep.12718","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

This study examined how parenting styles influence children's language skills and reading comprehension.

Materials and Methods

Six hundred and eighty-five Chinese-speaking third graders (Mage = 9.23 years, SD = .66; 341 girls) were randomly recruited from eight primary schools. We measured students' primary caregivers' parenting styles, parental education, family income, migration status, number of children's extracurricular books in the home and family cohesion at Wave 1 (i.e. grade 3). We also assessed students' reading motivation, language skills (i.e. vocabulary knowledge and syntactic awareness) and reading comprehension at Wave 2 (i.e. grade 4).

Results

The structural equation model analysis revealed that parenting styles indirectly affect language and reading comprehension development, with authoritative and authoritarian parenting exerting different influences on the two outcomes. Specifically, authoritative parenting was positively related to the number of children's books, which in turn was directly, or indirectly through reading motivation, associated with children's language skills and reading comprehension. In contrast, authoritarian parenting was negatively related to family cohesion, which was associated with children's reading motivation, and consequently, their language skills and reading comprehension. The multigroup analysis showed that the indirect pathways varied slightly across parental migration statuses.

Discussion and Conclusion

These findings enhance the global understanding of the pathways linking parenting styles to children's language skills and reading comprehension, suggesting that educators and researchers should not overly emphasize the direct role of parenting styles in children's academic performance.

父母的教养方式如何影响小学生语言技能和阅读理解能力的发展。
背景和目的:本研究探讨了父母的教养方式如何影响儿童的语言技能和阅读理解能力:从八所小学随机招募了六百八十五名讲中文的三年级学生(年龄:9.23 岁,SD:0.66;女生 341 名)。我们在第一波次(即三年级)测量了学生的主要照顾者的教养方式、父母教育程度、家庭收入、移民状况、家中儿童课外书数量和家庭凝聚力。我们还在第二波(即四年级)评估了学生的阅读动机、语言技能(即词汇知识和句法意识)和阅读理解能力:结构方程模型分析表明,教养方式间接影响语言和阅读理解能力的发展,权威型和专制型教养方式对这两种结果的影响不同。具体来说,权威型教养方式与儿童读物的数量呈正相关,而儿童读物的数量又直接或通过阅读动机间接地与儿童的语言技能和阅读理解能力相关。与此相反,专制型养育方式与家庭凝聚力呈负相关,而家庭凝聚力与儿童的阅读动机相关,进而与儿童的语言技能和阅读理解能力相关。多组分析表明,父母移民身份不同,间接途径也略有不同:这些研究结果加深了人们对父母教养方式与儿童语言技能和阅读理解能力之间关系的全面了解,并建议教育工作者和研究人员不要过分强调父母教养方式在儿童学业成绩中的直接作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信