Kana Matsukawa, Yasuko Kato, Aya Yoshida, Hisaka Onishi, Sachiko Nakano, Masanobu Itoh, Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu-Kouno
{"title":"Sharp decline in male fertility in F2 hybrids of the female-heterogametic silk moth Bombyx.","authors":"Kana Matsukawa, Yasuko Kato, Aya Yoshida, Hisaka Onishi, Sachiko Nakano, Masanobu Itoh, Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu-Kouno","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyae149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual selection drives rapid evolution of morphological, physiological, and behavioral traits, especially in males, and it may also drive the rapid evolution of hybrid male sterility. Indeed, the faster male theory of speciation was once viewed as a major cause of Haldane's rule in male-heterogametic XY taxa, but is increasingly being replaced by the genetic conflict hypothesis partly because it cannot explain the faster evolution of hybrid female sterility in female-heterogametic ZW taxa. The theory nonetheless predicts that there should be more genes for hybrid male sterility than for hybrid female sterility even in such taxa, but this remains untested. Thus, finding evidence for the faster male theory of reproductive isolation beyond the F1 generation in ZW systems still represents a challenge to studying the impact of sexual selection. In this study, we examined F2 hybrids between the domesticated silkworm Bombyx mori and the wild silk moth Bombyx mandarina, which have ZW sex determination. We found that although only females showed reduced fertility in the F1 generation, the F2 hybrid males had a significant reduction in fertility compared with the parental and F1 males. Importantly, 27% of the F2 males and 15% of the F2 females were completely sterile, suggesting the presence of recessive incompatibilities causing male sterility in female-heterogametic taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyae149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sexual selection drives rapid evolution of morphological, physiological, and behavioral traits, especially in males, and it may also drive the rapid evolution of hybrid male sterility. Indeed, the faster male theory of speciation was once viewed as a major cause of Haldane's rule in male-heterogametic XY taxa, but is increasingly being replaced by the genetic conflict hypothesis partly because it cannot explain the faster evolution of hybrid female sterility in female-heterogametic ZW taxa. The theory nonetheless predicts that there should be more genes for hybrid male sterility than for hybrid female sterility even in such taxa, but this remains untested. Thus, finding evidence for the faster male theory of reproductive isolation beyond the F1 generation in ZW systems still represents a challenge to studying the impact of sexual selection. In this study, we examined F2 hybrids between the domesticated silkworm Bombyx mori and the wild silk moth Bombyx mandarina, which have ZW sex determination. We found that although only females showed reduced fertility in the F1 generation, the F2 hybrid males had a significant reduction in fertility compared with the parental and F1 males. Importantly, 27% of the F2 males and 15% of the F2 females were completely sterile, suggesting the presence of recessive incompatibilities causing male sterility in female-heterogametic taxa.
期刊介绍:
GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work.
While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal.
The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists.
GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.