[Guidelines Within And For Public Health Services: Results Of An Online Survey On Current Practical Needs].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1055/a-2406-4786
Laura Arnold, Maria Steinisch, Anna Kuehne, Anna Schwabe, Elke Jakubowski, Anjali Scholten, Jan M Stratil
{"title":"[Guidelines Within And For Public Health Services: Results Of An Online Survey On Current Practical Needs].","authors":"Laura Arnold, Maria Steinisch, Anna Kuehne, Anna Schwabe, Elke Jakubowski, Anjali Scholten, Jan M Stratil","doi":"10.1055/a-2406-4786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based guidelines are recognized and well-established in everyday medical practice. However, in the Public Health Service (PHS), evidence-based guidelines are not yet widely available. To promote the development of guidelines within and for the ÖGD, the Federal Joint Committee (GBA) issued a funding directive in June 2024. This study presents the results of an online survey on the prioritization of guideline topics in the ÖGD, conducted by the German Society for Public Health Services (DGÖG). The survey focused on 17 guideline topics proposed by the GBA, which were divided into six task areas. Out of over 900 participants, comprehensive responses from nearly 500 respondents were analyzed, 85% of whom work in local health departments. The results showed that all 17 guideline topics were assigned high or very high priority. Particularly frequently prioritized were the areas of infection hygiene monitoring, medical expert assessment, and psychosocial emergency care. Additionally, experts highlighted dental screening, health literacy on oral health, and monitoring of drinking and bathing water. The qualitative analysis further identified additional relevant topics, including health reporting and planning, health promotion and prevention, child welfare, as well as crisis management and communication. The survey provides insights into the priority topics for guidelines as perceived by practitioners and ÖGD researchers. The results underscore the significant need for evidence-based guidelines in and for the ÖGD and provide valuable insights for further development and prioritization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2406-4786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines are recognized and well-established in everyday medical practice. However, in the Public Health Service (PHS), evidence-based guidelines are not yet widely available. To promote the development of guidelines within and for the ÖGD, the Federal Joint Committee (GBA) issued a funding directive in June 2024. This study presents the results of an online survey on the prioritization of guideline topics in the ÖGD, conducted by the German Society for Public Health Services (DGÖG). The survey focused on 17 guideline topics proposed by the GBA, which were divided into six task areas. Out of over 900 participants, comprehensive responses from nearly 500 respondents were analyzed, 85% of whom work in local health departments. The results showed that all 17 guideline topics were assigned high or very high priority. Particularly frequently prioritized were the areas of infection hygiene monitoring, medical expert assessment, and psychosocial emergency care. Additionally, experts highlighted dental screening, health literacy on oral health, and monitoring of drinking and bathing water. The qualitative analysis further identified additional relevant topics, including health reporting and planning, health promotion and prevention, child welfare, as well as crisis management and communication. The survey provides insights into the priority topics for guidelines as perceived by practitioners and ÖGD researchers. The results underscore the significant need for evidence-based guidelines in and for the ÖGD and provide valuable insights for further development and prioritization.

[公共卫生服务指南:关于当前实际需求的在线调查结果]。
在日常医疗实践中,以证据为基础的指导原则已得到认可和确立。然而,在公共卫生局(PHS)中,循证指南尚未得到广泛应用。为了促进ÖGD内部及为ÖGD制定指南,联邦联合委员会(GBA)于2024年6月发布了一项资助指令。本研究介绍了由德国公共卫生服务协会(DGÖG)开展的关于ÖGD指南主题优先次序的在线调查结果。调查的重点是由 GBA 提出的 17 个指南主题,这些主题被划分为六个任务领域。在 900 多名参与者中,对近 500 名受访者的综合答复进行了分析,其中 85% 的受访者在地方卫生部门工作。结果显示,所有 17 个指南主题都被赋予了较高或非常高的优先级。尤其是感染卫生监测、医疗专家评估和社会心理紧急护理等领域被列为优先事项。此外,专家们还强调了牙科筛查、口腔健康知识普及以及饮用水和洗澡水监测。定性分析进一步确定了其他相关主题,包括健康报告和规划、健康促进和预防、儿童福利以及危机管理和沟通。调查深入了解了从业人员和 ÖGD 研究人员所认为的指南优先主题。调查结果表明,ÖGD 非常需要以证据为基础的指南,并为进一步发展和确定优先事项提供了宝贵的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信